1/60 Yamato VF-4G Web-Exclusive Toy

[ErikElvis]

How many times does it have to be said that the VF-X VF-4 is not the FB2012 version?

[MichaelS]

5 times so far

[MichaelS]

You know what now the back ground info needs to change on the VF-4G per mech manual only differance between VF-4G and VF-4 is engine swap, but with SK approval of VFX model there is now an aerodynamics change as well.

[sketchley]

You know what now the back ground info needs to change on the VF-4G per mech manual only differance between VF-4G and VF-4 is engine swap, but with SK approval of VFX model there is now an aerodynamics change as well.

It's a bit more than that... :

• VF-4A: First production model.
  
• VF-4B: Two-seater attack enhanced model. Since the VF-4 isn't used for electronic warfare, even though the rear seat is for an electronic warfare officer, it is primarily used as a training plane.
  
• VF-4C: atmospheric flight specified model. It's primary ability is to be functionally both inside and outside of atmosphere.
  
• VF-4D: C model modified to navy (ship airplane) specification. Although space inside the main body was increased with the removal of equipment needed for space operation, due to it's inferior mobility, it is mainly used for purposes other than dog fighting; such as interception and warship attacking via missile.
  
• VF-4S: D model modified specification for atmospheric use only. S (SEA) is Marine. Measures to protect the engines against damage from salt water, etc., have been taken.
  
• VF-4SL "lightly equipped type": omits the arms and one part of the transformation mechanism of the S type; specializes as an anti-ship attacker and ambush craft. Cannot transform into battroid and can only transform into an arm-less GERWALK. Many of these craft were loved by the Unified Forces Emigrant Fleet Escort Units.
  
• VF-4G: latest type in the series with a strengthened space warfare capability; the original [intended] use of the VF-4. The engines, avionics, particle beam gun, etc., have been updated with the latest technology. Has an upgraded head unit with an anti-aircraft laser. In service in 2047 in the Special Service Force Ravens.
  

Edited July 24, 2012 by sketchley

[MichaelS]

But that does not make any mention of airframe aerodynamic changes which is now obvious in FB 2012 version and VF-4G. Also note that Yamato's VF-4G does not have the anti-aircraft head.

[Reïvaj]

Even though it was Kawamori himself who designed the anti-aircraft head I don't think that's official line art, otherwise Yamato should've had to use it.

[MichaelS]

But I could see where it would be a nice inclusion as spare kinda like pylon weapons and gunpod, I am starting to think that is also wishful thinking.

[MichaelS]

Hey Sketchley where did you get that info from? Also why dies the VF-4 not have internal micro missle launchers?

[Kyp Durron]

Hey Sketchley where did you get that info from? Also why dies the VF-4 not have internal micro missle launchers?

Apparently, because the design didn't allow room for them.

-Kyp

[MichaelS]

Doh I walked into that one!

[sketchley]

More on the VF-4: http://nomansland.site.nfoservers.com/MRG-Active-Archive//forums/index.php?topic=2503.msg37738#msg37738

http://nomansland.site.nfoservers.com/MRG-Active-Archive//forums/index.php?topic=2481.msg37165#msg37165

http://nomansland.site.nfoservers.com/MRG-Active-Archive/forums/index.php?topic=2250.msg33503#msg33503

[sketchley]

Even though it was Kawamori himself who designed the anti-aircraft head I don't think that's official line art, otherwise Yamato should've had to use it.

If memory serves, that head design was specifically created for the Studio Half-Eye garage kit. As Yamato only has the licence for VF-X, and this alternative command specification head didn't appear in it, this toy won't have it.

Alas, it doesn't clarify if the alternative head is part of the official setting or not.

[EXO]

[505thAirborne]

Thanks for the pics EXO, my wallet just screamed really loud!!!!!!!!

[xrentonx]

Lookin good!

[UN Spacy]

Okay. I'm gonna need a preorder link...STAT.

[raptormesh]

Fighter mode is a beaut, battroid looks...strange.

[EXO]

That's one purty burdy!

[raptormesh]

Thanks for the pics EXO, my wallet just screamed really loud!!!!!!!!

My wallet just filed for a restraining order...

[Reïvaj]

Fighter mode is a beaut, battroid looks...strange.

This is probably due to the fact that it’s still missing some bits and pieces + some posing issues.

[Reïvaj]

Have you noticed the Speaker Pod Gamma for VF-19Kai?

Edited July 25, 2012 by Reïvaj

[charger69]

Have you noticed the Speaker Pod Gamma for VF-19Kai?

I thought it was a PET bottle

[Ignacio Ocamica]

Awesome, and I'm starting to like this scheme better than Hikaru's!!!

[charger69]

Battroid mode has a SV-51 feel to me...

Edited July 25, 2012 by charger69

[sketchley]

image

Note the reference - Macross Chronicle FB2012 VF-4 page. Just double checked. No, repeat, no VF-X VF-4 on that page. Only FB2012 and M3.

[Mommar]

It's be nice to see a painted up version of the Battroid as well. It's definitely a subtle scheme. Very low viz like. This could wind up being a dream for people who like to paint their own schemes... except for the price/availability.

[ErikElvis]

Man fighter look awesome. I don't see how battroid will be able to stand by itself though.

[Mommar]

It still appears to be a prototype that is being propped up but note that the thigh is angled backward a little bit. You may be right about it's weight distribution. Though they may find ways to lighten it's load now that they've got these things assembled/standing. One would hope anyway.

[ErikElvis]

I wouldn't really be upset if it did need a stand. Ive always had some doubts about it.

[wm cheng]

Wow! That fighter looks fantastic. Thanks for sharing EXO. I guess you'd have to paint the entire thing white for the FB2012 custom (or is it just the moveable surfaces?) - or maybe keep the grey and do a low-viz version maybe where you'd only have to paint the tails.

I just hope we can get our hands on one of these beauties here in Canada without too much of a markup.

[Dobber]

Fantastic! This weekend can not come fast enough so we will finally know price and possibly be able to start pre-ordering.

Thanks for the pic EXO.

Chris

[raptormesh]

Indeed the fighter looks really really brilliant. Much better than I had hoped...as someone who doesn't like white valks but prefer low vis this is actually better than the FB2012 scheme.

[eyesonme78]

I need to look out for preorders already..

Anyways thks exo:)

[xrentonx]

I prefer low viz so this version being the actual released one is great!

[Dimis]

I wouldn't really be upset if it did need a stand. Ive always had some doubts about it.

Oh no, not obligatory stands. Ever since my experience with handling the Aquarion SOCs i've developed a phobia! Although with this i too prefer the fighter mode so don't mind very much!