frothymug Posted November 5, 2010 Posted November 5, 2010 Every clip I see of Skyline just makes me even more mad. However, a comment about the design of the alien creatures... Does anyone remember the Ur-Quan from the Star Control series?
Zor Primus Posted November 5, 2010 Posted November 5, 2010 I'll give it a chance. LOL the MW guinea pig...good luck!
Vepariga Posted November 6, 2010 Posted November 6, 2010 Im gonna need it if I survive I'll let you know.
505thAirborne Posted November 7, 2010 Posted November 7, 2010 Monsters was ON DEMAND the same day as theaters. I just saw that I have it on my cable carriers ON DEMAND. Hmmmm, $6.99 to rent it, is it worth it? I'll flip a coin.
Chewie Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 Don't go see Skyline. It's not terribly terrible like everyone keeps saying but it's definitely not worth $10.50.
Vepariga Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 saw it,yeahhh...I felt rather ripped off. mindless fun,but the ending was a cheap grab for a squeal that no-one will probably be interested enough to care about.
Kanedas Bike Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 Don't go see Skyline. It's more terribly terrible than everyone keeps saying and it's definitely not worth any amount of $. fixed -b.
taksraven Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 So in a year where we have had Kick-Ass, Inception and The Social Network, this film doesn't cut it? Sounds like the Strauss Brothers are going to be run out of town by a mob carrying flaming torches and pitchforks. Why didn't the same happen to Micheal Bay after TF:ROTF?? Taksraven
eugimon Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 wait... so skyline is an actual movie... shown in the theater? I could have sworn it was syfy's crap of the week.
HappyPenguins Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 wait... so skyline is an actual movie... shown in the theater? I could have sworn it was syfy's crap of the week. lol ditto
wolfx Posted November 14, 2010 Posted November 14, 2010 SKyline...crap story....emo ppl....even worse ending. Aliens were cool though.
Zor Primus Posted November 16, 2010 Posted November 16, 2010 I heard the ending was "surprising" but the rest was meh...I'll wait for it to be on instant netflix.
shiroth Posted November 16, 2010 Posted November 16, 2010 Glad i checked out this thread before i spent money going to see this film. Will watch it eventually, though for now that's £7 that's staying in my wallet.
Seanzilla Posted November 16, 2010 Posted November 16, 2010 ^ Me too. Seems universally hated here. Instead I'll wait for this: Battle:Los Angeles http://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi2069535001/
anime52k8 Posted November 17, 2010 Posted November 17, 2010 ^ Me too. Seems universally hated here. Instead I'll wait for this: Battle:Los Angeles http://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi2069535001/ could be fun. I wonder if they'll actually let Michelle Rodriguez live this time?
areaseven Posted November 18, 2010 Posted November 18, 2010 Looks like we've found the perfect team to do the RT LAM.
aerocombatpilot Posted April 3, 2011 Posted April 3, 2011 Just saw it on DVD and it wasn't that bad! Of course I did my usual fast forward past all the people parts and only watched the effects, which were decent. The aliens and ships were pretty cool looking except the giant aliens were bio-mechanical suits; much like the aliens in Independence Day. All in all I'm glad I saw it on DVD instead of the movie theaters because you have to stop and pause to really enjoy the alien scenes, and believe me that the only parts you will enjoy in this film!!!
jenius Posted July 15, 2011 Posted July 15, 2011 Just watched this (Skyline) and will concur it's not very good. One thought though, it has a little Southern Cross flavor to it. A mysterious alien faction shows up on earth, does some serious body snatching, and uses the snatched bodies to produce more warriors (that's a bit of a spoiler though since that doesn't get revealed until the end). The non-ending just seemed like a "oops, wrote ourselves into a corner... here's to hoping we can make a sequel." One of the aliens seemed very Matrix, another Alien looked like it was straight from the Lost Planet games.
electric indigo Posted June 2, 2014 Posted June 2, 2014 Looks like there's a "Monsters" sequel. I admit the trailer is quite cool.
Knight26 Posted June 2, 2014 Posted June 2, 2014 I loved Monsters, total sleeper, and underrated, but a great movie that really does get to you on a lot of levels. I hope that the sequel does it justice. It looks like they are taking a more action oriented turn this time, almost like how Aliens did after Alien, just a heck of a lot grittier.. What is that crappy as "song" in the trailer? As for Skyline, that was a demo reel gone wrong and is better left buried somewhere never to be seen or heard of again.
Tking22 Posted June 2, 2014 Posted June 2, 2014 I thought Monsters was okay, way too slow and the love story just didn't do it for me, Skyline on the other hand, was so bad is was offensive. Monsters 2 looks cool, I take it Gareth Edwards isn't back to direct? He totally rocked Godzilla, so I'm looking forward to what he works on next.
electric indigo Posted June 3, 2014 Posted June 3, 2014 He totally rocked Godzilla, so I'm looking forward to what he works on next. Aside from a Godzilla sequel, he's attached to a still unnamed Star Wars side feature, which fan rumor has it will deal with Boba Fett (so it will not happen...)
electric indigo Posted September 5, 2014 Posted September 5, 2014 New Trailer - looking good. It's something like Jarhead vs. the Cloverfield Gang.
Kanedas Bike Posted September 6, 2014 Posted September 6, 2014 Absolutely looks like Jarhead meets Monsters. I'd be down to watch on Netflix. -b.
TangledThorns Posted August 17, 2017 Posted August 17, 2017 Thread resurrection time! I actually paid to watch Skyline at a theater when it was released. It was a slow weekend. Anyways, it had decent FX but was awful overall. I'm surprised a sequel is being made but it actually looks better than the first film. But that's a low bar. A very very low bar.
anime52k8 Posted August 17, 2017 Posted August 17, 2017 (edited) trailer looks kind of cool, but then I remember that the trailer for the first one looked kind of cool too. Edited August 17, 2017 by anime52k8
BeyondTheGrave Posted August 20, 2017 Posted August 20, 2017 The first one was a worldwide blockbuster?!
mikeszekely Posted August 20, 2017 Posted August 20, 2017 I really shouldn't care enough to ask, seeing as I hated Skyline and probably wouldn't watch a sequel without being blackout drunk, but it's going to bug me if I don't... Why are Monsters and Skyline sharing a thread? What's the connection, aside from both making significantly more at the box office than they cost to make?
anime52k8 Posted August 20, 2017 Posted August 20, 2017 They were both low budget sci-fi films about space monsters that came out at the same time.
TangledThorns Posted April 28, 2018 Posted April 28, 2018 (edited) Just watched Beyond Skyline on Netflix. It's a B movie that doesn't hide that its a B movie and is way better than the original with good SFX and action, reminds me of the classic B films from the 1980s. Namely The Eliminators, Spacehunter and anything starring Tim Thomerson. Its fun to watch if you like B movie sci-fi and is better than some of the other sci-fi 'originals' crap I've seen on Netflix too. Edited April 28, 2018 by TangledThorns
anime52k8 Posted April 28, 2018 Posted April 28, 2018 just watching some clips on youtube, I'm surprised how much worse the effects look in the finished film than they do in the trailer.
TangledThorns Posted March 20, 2021 Posted March 20, 2021 Yay, Skyline is now a trilogy... at least so far. lol. Just started watching the third Skyline film on Netflix last night. It's B grade sci-fi so I know what I'm getting into and it doesn't insult my intelligence like some recent A grade films have in recent years.
electric indigo Posted February 6, 2022 Posted February 6, 2022 I happened to see Monsters: Dark Continent, and I was pleasantly surprised! It is difficult to categorize and surely will disappoint the standard SF crowd expecting a soldiers vs creatures bullet fest. As a war drama, it would possibly function entirely without the SF elements, which are sparse to begin with, but actually the Monsters do work in the concept by adding a metaphysical perspective on the absurdity of the human struggle (much like the wildlife shots in Thin Red Line). While the first Monsters was a small scale indie movie, this one has a budget for high level production values an VFX, and most of all, the people involved in the making were knowing what they were doing. You see the influences of Jarhead or Full Metal Jacket, but the movie manages to craft its own experience via the magnificent direction and cinematography. Rather than giving lengthy expositions and moving a plot forward, the sequence of visuals let’s you feel the transformation of the characters, and this is a good example of the power of film – and SF film in particular, which opens the door to another level of artistic freedom. The crux of these movies is that once they’re marketed as SF, the viewer expectations are narrowed down to the well worn genre conventions. The impressive „Encounters“, a family drama with killer performances by Riz Ahmed and the child actors, fell into the same trap recently.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now