Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 hours ago, jvmacross said:

o0960041113921968311.jpg?caw=800


LOL! Perfect pic.

The fighter front end is such a turn off. They managed to take a nice sleek radome & make it look like a jet of the 40's / 50's that has nose intakes.   

Posted

Yeah, that looks pretty terrible. The nose, undersized canopy, and humpback. At least he didn’t skip leg day 

  • 3 weeks later...
  • bambooluv changed the title to Sentinel Co VF's and Armored VF spotted at ACGHK
Posted (edited)

In 2025, someone had to try to make it as least accurate and unattractive as possible. 

Edited by Raikkonen
Posted

The arms and fuselage are ok, but those legs.  The only explanation for that, that I can contemplate, is that it is some sort of test bed/interim design between the VF-1 and VF-4.

Posted
25 minutes ago, Knight26 said:

The arms and fuselage are ok, but those legs.  The only explanation for that, that I can contemplate, is that it is some sort of test bed/interim design between the VF-1 and VF-4.

Or too much alcohol/ mind-altering substances for the designers. 🫥

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Most transformable VF models aim for tight fighter-mode silhouettes.
Perfect panel lines. Zero gaps.
But the tradeoff? You can barely move the damn thing in Battroid mode.

This new manufacturer flipped the script.
I remember seeing the prototype two years ago at a local convention —
people were… lukewarm.

But now? The real thing hits different.
Transformation is solid
Battroid mode is actually poseable
Feels like a machine, not a fragile shelf queen

You’re not just transforming it.
You’re playing it.

Finally — a VF-1 that's not just for photos.
It stands. It poses. It fights.
And you don’t have to worry about breaking it every time you twist a joint.001.jpg.fcf6c64eef6fa676f89e65364e9158dd.jpg101.jpg.c90f839884f9cb944dd0b02655046251.jpg003.jpg.0c42ce0d4d8ef2699abb80f54d187d50.jpg102.jpg.84c3d2275927d4c812adcf85a9ea8636.jpg004.jpg.975f1ffccd4ec1c04e8a18d0e8873cb6.jpg103.jpg.5e1a4df1d10ea09357f5e979899a8558.jpg20.jpg.ff93f8fda85b91a3e4aeb78f15dc67b2.jpg201.jpg.22db8834651630ed132b0d1d520f6ea4.jpg202.jpg.ef9c8ebaee5748c2484d36a577b8f5d0.jpg203.jpg.c02164040e84fc78a41a0feb5a2abcf8.jpg204.jpg.1ea298694769da2761b49470b1802d24.jpg104.jpg.13f07ae71fd7825e36583a92349084ae.jpg

002.jpg

Posted
1 hour ago, m0n5t3r said:

Saw this pic from a preorder... WTH is up with those landing gears? this whole thing?

b52c541c-2fab-4999-afaa-379211659df9.jpeg

I fixed it for you. 

Posted

20 years later and they still pulled out a fighter mode that looks worse than Toynami MPCs.

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Black Valkyrie said:

 

@Gundam@EFSF  Thanks for the review, I really liked when saw it for the first time, I consider it the Chunky monkey of the 21st Century.  I am planning to get the 1S and 1A CF. 

 

More like the chunky cellulite monkey version 

Posted
4 hours ago, jvmacross said:

I know chunky monkeys....that isn't a chunky monkey in any century....:shok:

Closer to a DX Henkei, but that's disrespectful to Takatoku Henkeis.

Posted
58 minutes ago, Hiriyu said:

Closer to a DX Henkei, but that's disrespectful to Takatoku Henkeis.

Yeah...being a POS intentionally is just a bad, head-scratching move....

Posted
On 8/4/2025 at 8:24 AM, sh9000 said:

That's the Bandai DX VF-1 line.

Describes ThreeZero's Robo-Dou VF-1s, too! 👍

Posted
7 hours ago, rsvictor1976 said:

i kind of like how it looks in Gerwalk mode.

From the top it gets ugly the way the intakes stick out at the sides.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Big s said:

From the top it gets ugly the way the intakes stick out at the sides.

Agreed; I also don't like how the arms mount to the body there either. And the legs are just plain fugly...

Edited by pengbuzz
Posted
2 hours ago, pengbuzz said:

Agreed; I also don't like how the arms mount to the body there either. And the legs are just plain fugly...

I got so distracted by how the legs look like they’re falling off that I didn’t notice how the arms also look like they’re falling off

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I bought one of these because I was very curious and just got it in a few days ago: 

Pros:

-very solid, high-quality feel to the materials (mostly). 

-great poseability in Battroid mode

-some interesting design choices that make the figure feel dynamic

 

Cons: 

-Barely anything tabs together in Gerwalk or fighter mode, and what does uses very shallow, tiny tabs that will likely break after time

-Impossible to get it aligned in fighter mode, even after finagling and massaging it for nearly an hour

-Fake chest inserts for Battroid, and also a fake upper/shoulder insert.  I hate parts-forming, so this was annoying.  Head just floats, doesn't peg to anything without the insert

-Floating waist, die cast hips don't connect to the nose cone

-Broke off one of the antennae when trying to adjust the legs in fighter mode, the head doesn't really feel like it sits anywhere properly in any mode

-Standard fist that can fold into the arm doesn't have a hole for the rifle, so parts-swapping is necessary when not in fighter-mode

 

Honestly if this thing was $100 less, i'd be ok with it, but as it stands it isn't quite as solid and "toyetic" as I was hoping for.

Posted

Glad it feels solid at least, it certainly doesn't look like it should be.

It kind of looks like someone looked at the original VF-1, saw the VF-2SS, and went, "Hey, what if we take that older one and update it so it looks more like the same kind of sloppy collection of robot parts cosplaying as an aircraft as the newer one?"
"Brilliant!"

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...