All Activity
- Past hour
-
I personally feel more secure with my renewals transformation. the plastic on the triangles isnt as brittle as the original.
-
Thank God I prefer the 17D. The 17 has a ton of anime magic. Just hard to get all three modes somewhat presentable on a toy. But if you all are warning it has the same flaws/design issues as the 171, it makes it a much easier pass. Don’t feel like dealing with preorder madness garbage either.
-
ah man.... this is kinda Unaccpetable.....
-
@Bolt @Test_Pilot_2 Thank you!
-
@MommarYes
-
Thank You from the bottom of my heart!
- Today
-
i wonder if the shoulder triangles will crumble
-
lol
-
"Holding up" doesn't do anything to fix the fundamental flaws in the engineering of this design. The legs are still one misguided transformation away from shattering, unless they've completely redesigned the mechanism, and I saw no change with that in the renewal.
-
I'll add the DX VF-17S to the collection. Maybe keep it in Fighter mode and use the Yamato 1/60 for Battroid mode. Hoping that a HMR VF-17S also gets released.
-
General 1/18 Scale Figure and Toy Thread
sh9000 replied to sh9000's topic in Anime or Science Fiction
GI Joe The Movie figures coming soon.
-
Your Most Recent General Toy Purchase - 2024 Edition
sh9000 replied to azrael's topic in Anime or Science Fiction
Transformers Generations Studio Series TFTM Ironhide.
-
This is one of those occasions where the Yamato version is just better, imo. I was fine with the way the 171 as it was designed that way from the start. But the 17 was a chonkier design and had its own charms and aesthetics that were its own. The head even seems disproportionate to the body on this Bandai version. I wonder if the FAST packs will work on this if they decide to do them.
-
But, to be fair, so far the revival VF-171EX is holding up OK, with no issues.
-
Yeah, so checking the pics more carefully, it looks like they are reusing a lot of VF-171 parts. As a result, there's a lot of things that are not lineart correct for the VF-17. It's missing the VF-17's dual micro-misille launchers on each shoulder. It's got incorrect VF-171 dual micro-missile ports on the inside of each lower leg. Lower legs are way too skinny. I'm sure there are other areas that are not lineart correct also.
-
I'm surprised how positive reception to this has been. The 171 is one of if not the worst DX Valkyrie (second only to the V1 VF-25) and is now repurposed with almost no changes for a design that has totally different proportions from the lineart. The YF-21 got a lot of crap but at least it was an earnest ground-up effort.
-
Bandai just deliberately skipped leg day assymetrically on this...
-
Skinny or not im going for it, unless Arcadia steps up.
-
Glad that it hasn't disappeared. I got a bit worried when it didn't show at WF 24 Winter.
-
Ok, Bandi, NO. You did not just duplicate the crappy knees on this. You need a slap upside the head with the Yamato version. Seriously, screw this, that is just the worst possible decision ever. None of the major issues from the 171 are even slightly different here, so there is no reason this is not going to explode catastrophically just like the 171.
-
from https://x.com/simsim5479/status/1971020441360937452 web-translated:
-
Great that Bandai is expanding on Macross 7. A skinny 17 in Battroid does look weird though, the feeling I get when first seeing this is akin to latest pics of Dwayne Johnson, as compared to say when he was in F&F. It has a lot of the DX 171 vibes all over.
-
Expanding the info from the link:
.jpg.598877cab128ba2e30da98607a4b0afa.jpg)
-
Great, another remake worse than its predecessor. 🫤 Did Bandai just take all the cues from the VF-171 and paint it black. Super pass on the first batch. Waiting for these to hit bargain bins.
-
Just when I thought I was out.
