Jump to content

kajnrig

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4920

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by kajnrig

  1. kajnrig
    My closet is perpetually half-closed for this very reason...
  2. kajnrig
    I'm half-certain that's the same kit as the conversion but with the necessary VF-25 parts included as resin recasts. I say that based solely on the parts pictures, so... Yeah. Take that with all the grains of salt.
  3. kajnrig
    The YF-29 conversion kit wasn't/isn't transformable, by the way. It's a fixed fighter mode kit. http://www.e2046.com/p/22799
  4. kajnrig
    Ah, thanks for the pics. Yeah, that's the Avalanche Dash, not the original Avalanche, but it's still odd that that weapon was never reproduced on any official model kit or figure. I guess it must have been dropped somewhere along the way. Anyway, it looks pretty frickin' neat. Now all it needs is to be able to split into two.
  5. kajnrig
    Looking at those forward shoulder parts again, are they supposed to be missile launchers like the ones that hang from the top chest/shoulders on the VF-25? On the DX Advance they're just depicted as armor pieces, but the line art (more so the Hasegawa one than the CG model profile) suggests a door with a hinge on the back... I doubt they would articulate, though. Maybe they'll provide options to build them closed or open... if they're even missile launchers at all.
  6. kajnrig
    Thanks. I've bookmarked it for future purchase when I start my next PW stockpile.
  7. kajnrig
    I don't remember the Avalanche Exia ever having that weapon, either. To my knowledge, the AE has the same weapons as the stock Exia (ie the Seven Swords), just moved to a storage rack on its back/shoulders.
  8. kajnrig
    Is that giant sword thing a "canon" item? Or was it made up for the TB?
  9. kajnrig
    Ooh, nice. What is that thing? I'd love to get my hands on it...
  10. kajnrig
    Quoting tc012009 from Gundam Eclipse: Actually, I think for the most part that IS separated by color. The biceps and elbows not so much, but most everything else looks to be that way. ...maybe not the lower chest...?
  11. kajnrig
    I keep mine up until the next delivery (so my records go back two orders), but certainly nothing over a year. I don't buy THAT many kits... Also, I just realized I test-fit the Hasegawa SV-262 for comparison pics (will still get you weights, Skypoet! just been busy :D). I suppose I could try and make that my entry... Beginner category at most, because I tend not to do too much modding to Hasegawa kits and scale aircraft kits in general.
  12. kajnrig
    Very much this.
  13. kajnrig
    I haven't watched the video or looked into the details yet, but here are some links. http://hlj.com/plamo-2017 EDIT for some breakdown of the competition: - Competition will last from Jan. 16 to Apr 30, 2017. - Any kit that was or is on sale on HLJ can be submitted for competition. - There will be 3 categories of competition: Beginner, Intermediate, and Advanced. - To enter, you must have a hobbylink.tv account and join one or more competition groups. (However, you may only submit one build. If you have one build in both the Intermediate and Beginner groups, you can only enter either the Beginner or Intermediate build for competition.) - Beginner = "Some panel-lines, decals, a touch of marker here or there and even hand painting is accepted." - Intermediate = "Give it a whole new paint scheme or a look all its own. Perhaps some parts swapping with other kits." - Advanced = "Airbrushed with highlights, a kit completely scratch-built, even a creation all your own that has never been seen before. Show some heavy duty damage or add those little touches that make it lifelike." - All prizes will be in-store credit. Earlier competitions awarded specific kits, causing many more problems for the HLJ staff. - Kits can not have been in progress as of the beginning of the competition (Jan. 16). Also, you cannot post any in-progress pictures or updates anywhere else but the above hobbylink.tv groups until AFTER the end date of the competition (Apr 30). (Thanks Darth Mingus) (Anything else you feel should be mentioned, let me know and I'll update the post.)
  14. kajnrig
    HLJ is hosting a plamo competition. I'll start a thread in the Model Kits section as well, but I figure I'd post the same links here while I'm at it. http://hlj.com/plamo-2017
  15. kajnrig
    If I remember correctly, the controllers either have wrist strap holes or have separate plastic housing accessories that come with wrist straps. It's a shame there's none on the device itself. Maybe it's possible to attach one via the controllers? I'm almost assuredly getting one, too, but not until after launch.
  16. kajnrig
    I dunno about weights of the models themselves, but judging by HLJ's product pages: The Bandai kit at 4400-5200 JPY ($40-$50), and the box weighs 630g The Hasegawa kit at 2800-3600 JPY ($25-$30), and the box weighs 380g The plastic-to-dollar ratio seems about the same for both, with Bandai offering a bit more value. (15.75:$1 vs 15.2:$1) I'll take some quick weight measurements off the runners and get back to you. Bandai's kit has more runners, but also more plastic in the pieces themselves due to thicker pieces and the various snap-fit/articulation features. As for the wing tabs, I agree that there's something just slightly out of place somewhere; one side is close to locking nicely, while on the other, the leg is extended too far back by about 2mm. I'm not about to mess with it anytime soon, as I'm afraid that I can only make things worse.
  17. kajnrig
    Come, now. Let's be subtle here. People might get the idea that you don't like a certain western media company and its western animated IP. Thanks for the clarification.
  18. kajnrig
    Yeah, I'm not sure if the name is supposed to be "you can build either the VF-19A or the VF-19EF" (which could be true for the former as its differences are internal, but not for the latter as it has very obvious external differences from the YF-19/VF-19A airframe) or "you can build the VF-19EF/A, which is the new name of the VF-19ADVANCE, and either has nothing to do with the VF-19EF at all or was heavily modified from a VF-19EF." I suppose that second possibility makes more sense, and the second possibility within that makes most sense given the production history of the VF-19EF. Isamu takes an existing VF-19EF from SMS, modifies it to look like the YF-19/VF-19A and incorporate VF-25 Super Packs, and the resulting custom gets re-designated the VF-19EF/A (for Advance). In that regard it's like a VF-19ACTIVE? Both are singular, ace custom modified VF-19EFs, but whereas the ACTIVE simply gets called the VF-19ACTIVE, the Advance keeps the VF-19EF name, just appending /A to it.
  19. kajnrig
    asdf Yeah, apparently both of these games just don't play well with AMD hardware. I just experienced framerate drops into the single digits even after optimization tweaks got it to go at 50-60 otherwise. Restarting took care of the issue, but only until next time... It's not entirely the engine. RAGE and The Evil Within, both developed on the same Id Tech 5 engine, share texture pop-in issues with these two games (which is a problem on both AMD and Nvidia hardware), but they otherwise don't have a problem with either brand (or at least they have the same problems on both brands). It's only these two games that selectively target AMD cards. Whatever driver issues might have existed have been ironed out; it's the game's fault at this point. If I could trade these two for Doom, I would. As it is right now, I feel too slighted to give Id any more of my money. Give it a month or two, once the memory of these games is gone from my mind, I'll probably gladly shell out twenty bucks or so for it.
  20. kajnrig
    Okay, okay. Okay. Look. Don't do this, Hasegawa. Don't do this to me. I only have so much money. (No but seriously thanks so much for the head's-up. Mayhaps I can hope for a RA VF-0 reissue, too?)
  21. kajnrig
    I figured Shawn and co. were fine with third-party threads for other IPs because they're strictly not Macross. I could be wrong. But that aside, I think the sheer complexity of Macross designs means a lack of toy attempts. Fixed-mode kits, sure, but I definitely haven't seen any transforming kit attempts, much less full-on toys with their higher QC demands.
  22. kajnrig
    Meh... *rumble rumble get ready for the sourpuss again* It's fine, I guess. This one doesn't hold together nearly as well as the VF-31, because the transformation demands much more precision. That complicated area around the intakes is particularly cumbersome, with I think four swiveling joints within the same cubic cm all needing to align in just the right way for transformations to work out nicely. The aforementioned intakes don't come together nicely for the battroid mode; there's always a major gap splitting the chest right down the middle, and even though I expected as much beforehand, it was still disappointing. Fighter mode suffers the most: the arms/shoulders/tailfin make for a gap-filled fuselage; it's impossible to get the wing root pegs to clamp into the legs; and no matter what I tried, I could never get the feet/engine exhaust nozzles to lock together, even before things became naturally misaligned from the transformation. Gerwalk mode is definitely where this kit shines. None of the above issues exist in Gerwalk mode (unless you for whatever reason want to display it with its arms stowed away), and it's easily the most aesthetically-pleasing of the three modes anyway. Oh, and the hands are still terrible. Y'know, because I need to. Now I just have to finish test-fitting the Hasegawa version for comparison.
  23. kajnrig
    Also, isn't it forum policy to not discuss/advertise/endorse unofficial products?
  24. kajnrig
    Hm. I went back to the Sayonara no Tsubasa scene and it actually looks like the in-movie model is more in line with the Hasegawa kit lineart than the DX. The shoulder bits are hard to tell, but they do wrap over the shoulder pivot points. The booster packs are also slimmer than they appear on the DX. (Look at the distance from booster to SMS logo on the wing.) Thanks for the pic, wmkjr. I totally forgot about that scan. It seems the shape of the Hasegawa kit's implementation is completely wrong, too. Shame about that, but I suppose it doesn't matter much regardless of which version you're hoping to build (VF-19EF/A because it had such limited screen-time, or YF-19 because those parts don't exist on it).
  25. kajnrig
    Yeah, I've never gotten the feeling that Zelda WASN'T an open-world game, whether it was listed as one or not. I don't know about the more recent and/or mobile ones, but during casual gameplay I've never felt that LttP/OoT/etc. was lacking in exploration options. I suppose this one can be considered more "open" in the sense that challenges aren't necessarily designed to be tackled in any particular way, but... Well, either way, I'll definitely be getting this game anyhow, so it's splitting hairs I suppose.
×
×
  • Create New...