Mechleader Posted February 10, 2005 Author Share Posted February 10, 2005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feyd-Rautha Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 she is pretty yummmmy, ehh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Majestic Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 She looks 12 in that picture. But since that's basically the demographic.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knight26 Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 She actually looks somewhat approaching attractive in that picture, someone must be feeding her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the white drew carey Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 She actually looks somewhat approaching attractive in that picture, someone must be feeding her. Sign outside of the EPIII set: "Don't feed the Natalie Portmans!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feyd-Rautha Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 i must say ...grevious and his henchmen look totally BaaaDa$s$$$$$$$$$$ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mechleader Posted February 11, 2005 Author Share Posted February 11, 2005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HWR MKII Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Is it me or is Ewan starting to look more like Alec Guiness? Weird considering that he is related to Dennis "Wedge Antillies" Lawson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radd Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Start with a vaguely passing resemblance, and add a lot of makeup. At times he does a fairly well done Sir Alec Guiness voice, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Valkyrie Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 SPOILER ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Valkyrie Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 SPOILER ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Valkyrie Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 A real Gundam ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Valkyrie Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Valkyrie Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hikuro Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Hehe....work...sllooooow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duke Togo Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Tha Vader/Palp pic is a fake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feyd-Rautha Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Tha Vader/Palp pic is a fake. good...cause vader looks stunted in that pic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knight26 Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 This one is so fake its not even funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Valkyrie Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 OK here`s the real thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent ONE Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Why do people bother to make fake SW pics? Seems like a waste of time to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr March Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Damn, did Rick M. ever put on the beef between Phantom Menace and Revenge of the Sith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cobywan Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Grievous is a fake too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chewie Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Grievous is a fake too. Why do you say that? And if it is, it's done pretty damn well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Effect Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 I don't think the Grievous image is fake to be honest. If it is, someone did a damn good job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cobywan Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 The detail is all wrong compared to the official photos that are out there. It is very amateurish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cobywan Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Look at the shoulders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cobywan Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 And here. That picture is really bad guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chewie Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 You're right. And now looking at it again I bet it's either from the Episode III game or Republic Commando. Whatchoo think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cobywan Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 And here. That picture is really bad guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guppy Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 SPOILER ! I wonder if all the toy marketing people for ep 3 were scratching their heads on how to market this for a young audience. It's like all those Aliens action figures that came out and flopped. The kids didn't like em cos the movie was too violent and they never saw it. The adults who liked the movie didn't like the toys cos they were for little kids and super-crappy. My favourite Aliens toy is this micro machines playset from Alien. There's even a little diorama for the kitchen scene with a chestburster popping out of John Hurt's chest. Just realised I got way sidetracked! hehe. Anyway my point is that it's funny to see dark/violent/scary movies with toy lines aimed at the kiddies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sundown Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 And here. That picture is really bad guys. Funny... the fake, if it is fake, looks better and more convincing to me, so far as feeling "real", than the official CG shots. -Al Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Jenius Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 And here. That picture is really bad guys. Funny... the fake, if it is fake, looks better and more convincing to me, so far as feeling "real", than the official CG shots. -Al You're kidding, right? Anyway my point is that it's funny to see dark/violent/scary movies with toy lines aimed at the kiddies. Yeah, but its SW, it will always be for kids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cobywan Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 Yeah, but its SW, it will always be for kids. And some kids will never grow up. (In case you hadn't guessed, I'm talking about me!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sundown Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 (edited) Funny... the fake, if it is fake, looks better and more convincing to me, so far as feeling "real", than the official CG shots.-Al You're kidding, right? *Shrug* I guess I'm a big sucker for gritty photorealism over glaringly CG. And I've never been a fan of ILM's renderer. Hard to tell what the body shot of the "fake" looks like, though... and I admit it looks a little light and flimsy, and lacks the heft of the CG shot. -Al Edited February 12, 2005 by Sundown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Jenius Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 Funny... the fake, if it is fake, looks better and more convincing to me, so far as feeling "real", than the official CG shots.-Al You're kidding, right? *Shrug* I guess I'm a big sucker for gritty photorealism over glaringly CG. And I've never been a fan of ILM's renderer. Hard to tell what the body shot of the "fake" looks like, though... and I admit it looks a little light and flimsy, and lacks the heft of the CG shot. -Al Ok. Well this is 2005 and photorealism doesn't always mean gritty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts