jenius Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 Ever heard of Mosler Auto? When I was into Corvettes I used to dream of this thing (or something like it): Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddsun1 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 (edited) Ever heard of Mosler Auto? When I was into Corvettes I used to dream of this thing (or something like it): Yes, I remember the MT900 fondly. A very capable car--certainly better looking than its predecessor, the Raptor--with good competition provenance; much more successful in Europe/abroad than in the US, I believe. Back in the early '00s, a real rivalry was beginning to take shape in Grand-Am between Mosler and Ferrari, with the MT900 and 360GT, respectively, as the Mosler was proving very capable of competing for class wins. Then, perhaps due to some political wrangling, or who knows what, all of a sudden the rules changed, and the Mosler was put into a different class. The Mosler teams suddenly found themselves having to run a different spec tire (much harder compounds, more suited for different type of car), lumped in with the tube-frame Trans-Am style silhouette racers; and they weren't too happy about it, IIRC. ed: went back and did some research, and I guess the simplest explanation is usually the best. I guess Mosler simply hadn't produced enough cars to meet homologation rules, hence the bump to another class. Edited October 15, 2010 by reddsun1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areaseven Posted October 19, 2010 Author Share Posted October 19, 2010 Anyone want to call BS on this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anime52k8 Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 Anyone want to call BS on this? No, not really. I've yet to hear a single convincing argument why the Porsche Cayenne isn't an excelent vehicle other than they typical bawing about how it's not a true Porsche and taints the brand because it's an SUV and not a rear engined sports car. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenius Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 I was given a Cayenne as a courtesy car while mine was in the shop and I didn't find it overly spectacular. I did some hill driving and I felt the automatic transmission was in a state of constant shifting. It had a bit of pep to it (obviously I wasn't in one of the baller versions) and an excellent turning radius but overall it didn't strike me as amazingly better than some of the other SUVs I've been in. Then again, my opinion is probably pretty tainted by my general dislike of SUVs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derex3592 Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 WHY am I now just finding this thread???? I'm a big car guy.....just picked up something incredible...will post pics when I get it home in a couple of weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areaseven Posted October 20, 2010 Author Share Posted October 20, 2010 No, not really. I've yet to hear a single convincing argument why the Porsche Cayenne isn't an excellent vehicle other than they typical bawling about how it's not a true Porsche and taints the brand because it's an SUV and not a rear engined sports car. I could care less about what the Porsche purists say. The Cayenne is just unattractive, even for an SUV. It looks like a giant refrigerator reshaped to somewhat resemble a Porsche. Yes, it's no worse than the Panamera, but it's still a bad design. If only Porsche used the time and money to develop a new 928... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ultimateone Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 Any Jeep Wrangler owners out there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areaseven Posted October 20, 2010 Author Share Posted October 20, 2010 LOL nice Regult/Glaug killboard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ultimateone Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 LOL nice Regult/Glaug killboard. Found that on e-Bay. Gotta be at least once a week my wife asks if I killed any aliens on the way home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areaseven Posted October 20, 2010 Author Share Posted October 20, 2010 What happens when you mashup two NASCAR movies? "Help me Tom Cruise! Tom Cruise, use your witchcraft on me to get the fire off me!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retracting Head Ter Ter Posted October 21, 2010 Share Posted October 21, 2010 (edited) Quick question. Given that they are only making 500 of the LFA's, are they all going to be LHD/RHD or both? Must be quite a bitch to make both versions for a 500 car run. BTW, 2011 model year GT-R has been announced. 530hp. Larger inlet,tweaked engine map, new honeycomb strut,slight mod to exhausts and new wheels. Edited October 21, 2010 by Retracting Head Ter Ter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent ONE Posted October 21, 2010 Share Posted October 21, 2010 LOL nice Regult/Glaug killboard. HAHA, dude that thing is awesome! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emajnthis Posted October 21, 2010 Share Posted October 21, 2010 Any Jeep Wrangler owners out there? I don't own one but my friend and i work on his YJ a lot, it's such a piece of crap but we love it, it has some strange charming quality to it. Plus you get the bonus of being a part of a community with the Wrangler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areaseven Posted October 22, 2010 Author Share Posted October 22, 2010 An Enzo Ferrari knockoff? Maybe, but the Simbol Design Lavazza GTX-R weighs in at 2,380 lbs. Under the hood is a V12 that generates 612 bhp. This results in an impressive ratio of 3.8 lbs. per bhp. Not impressive, though, is its 0-60 acceleration, which is 4.6 seconds. (Quote protected because Wanzerfan is a dumbass.) 2011 Simbol Design Lavazza GTX-R Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddsun1 Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 An Enzo Ferrari knockoff? Maybe, but the Simbol Design Lavazza GTX-R weighs in at 2,380 lbs. Under the hood is a V12 that generates 612 bhp. This results in an impressive ratio of 3.8 lbs. per bhp. Not impressive, though, is its 0-60 acceleration, which is 4.6 seconds. (Quote protected because Wanzerfan is a dumbass.) Hmm, interesting UCA design in the rear. But if the quality of those welds isn't up to snuff, well... LOL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anime52k8 Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 LOL! Ok, now that's funny! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent ONE Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 0-60 in 4.6 with a 600HP V12!?! Less than 2500 LBS!???!?!?!?!?! the 0-60 should be like sub 3!!! That thing SUUUUUUUKS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom64ss Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 This thread makes me want to watch Top Gear Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ultimateone Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 I don't own one but my friend and i work on his YJ a lot, it's such a piece of crap but we love it, it has some strange charming quality to it. Plus you get the bonus of being a part of a community with the Wrangler. My first was a YJ and that's the reason I know how to work on cars; I replaced and repaired all kinds of things on it. Well, that and maybe the fact that I was 16 with a jeep and drove it like I stole it had a little to do with it as well. My first baby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areaseven Posted October 24, 2010 Author Share Posted October 24, 2010 0-60 in 4.6 with a 600HP V12!?! Less than 2500 LBS!???!?!?!?!?! the 0-60 should be like sub 3!!! That thing SUUUUUUUKS. I went to the company's official website and it looks like there's a cut & paste error on their part. Some of the info was copied from the lower-end GTX model. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddsun1 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areaseven Posted October 27, 2010 Author Share Posted October 27, 2010 It weighs 3 tons and corners like an ocean liner, but just look at its acceleration and braking numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddsun1 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 It weighs 3 tons and corners like an ocean liner, but just look at its acceleration and braking numbers. Indeed. The numbers are downright shocking, for such a large car. It looks positively--uncomposed for lack of a better word--performing such maneuvers. LOL, that's a helluva lot of dough to fork over for what looks like a theme-park ride! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areaseven Posted October 29, 2010 Author Share Posted October 29, 2010 You gotta love Top Gear, especially with how Jeremy Clarkson tests the Renault Twingo 133 in this video. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddsun1 Posted October 29, 2010 Share Posted October 29, 2010 You gotta love Top Gear, especially with how Jeremy Clarkson tests the Renault Twingo 133 in this video. 2:10 Top Gear FTW! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddsun1 Posted October 29, 2010 Share Posted October 29, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areaseven Posted October 30, 2010 Author Share Posted October 30, 2010 What a waste of good paper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent ONE Posted October 30, 2010 Share Posted October 30, 2010 Dumbest ad ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areaseven Posted November 1, 2010 Author Share Posted November 1, 2010 Trans-Am fans have much to rejoice, sort of. Lingenfelter has unveiled their TA Concept based on the new Camaro. Its new front end, fenders, rear end and wheels evoke shades of the second-generation Pontiac Firebird. No word on the power specs of the Lingenfelter-tuned V8 under the hood. And just for Phyrox, here it is in white. 2010 Lingenfelter TA Concept Based on Chevrolet Camaro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anime52k8 Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 I think I just threw up a bit in my mouth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenius Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 I wish GM were doing something like that instead of Lingenfelter... I also think they could have done a bit better with that front fascia although I'm sure their design choices had performance more in mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miles316 Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 Does this mean we might get a new Smoke and the Bandit Movie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent ONE Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 This is a monument to the fact that american automakers have not had a new idea in 35 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddsun1 Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 (edited) Trans-Am fans have much to rejoice, sort of. Lingenfelter has unveiled their TA Concept based on the new Camaro. Its new front end, fenders, rear end and wheels evoke shades of the second-generation Pontiac Firebird. No word on the power specs of the Lingenfelter-tuned V8 under the hood. And just for Phyrox, here it is in white. Methinks the "LPE 455" badge will be a play on claimed HP figures(?), as I think that kind of displacement from a small block is highly unlikely, no matter how much you increase cyl bore and stroke. (but hey, GM got 427c.i. out of the basic block for the Vette, so who knows?). As to aesthetics, it will indeed be a love-it-or-hate-it kind of car. They're definitely catering to a niche market. Just remember, the Porsche 911 has remained basically unchanged (in layout) for over 40 years. ed: is it supercharged? don't see any drive belts, but--forgive my ignorance--kinda hard to tell, with all that plastic crap all over the engine bay. I hate that sh*t... ed-ed: meh, never mind--2nd look at the pic shows it's obviously not a huffer. *doh* Edited November 2, 2010 by reddsun1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts