All Activity
- Past hour
-
I don't know... Gorrila's picture looks like the panels were transformed properly. The edge of the toy looks pretty straight and the stripe matches the front portion of the plane. Looking at the box art, I think the stripe doesn't line up on purpose?
-
Gotcha, yeah, that's definitely a problem spot. The hips really just do not fit well, unfortunately. Interestingly, it's the same hip as the one that broke on my Fire Valk. Going to have to just chalk it up to Bandai borking the production on these somehow.
-
https://twitter.com/MTM_025_8_S04/status/1971750767272001794 web-translated:
-
That's not a tampo problem, that's a transformation problem. He didn't align the panels so the stripes actually match.
-
from Gorilla's HMR VF-19P (crooked line): from Motoki Hiroyuki's twitter-posting HMR VF-19P (correct/non-crooked)
-
+1 - They've made some incredible Macross toys
- Today
-
from https://twitter.com/cross_W42S/status/1971586122582282558 web-translated: (use web-translator for page below) https://valkyrie-hanger.sakura.ne.jp/blog/detail/277 sample: good luck!
-
I'll be watching
-
They do have different shoulders, but it's not really a significant enough difference for me to care, and it saves me from having to paint them to match if I make my own. I still might need to repaint the yellow part though. As for the others.. just because we think it makes sense for Bandai to make something doesn't mean they ever will. (Insert screaming about the Tomahawk here.) The Kai/P and F/S models have some significant changes. If Bandai doesn't think it's worth making, they won't do it. As much as I want to buy a ton, I'm keeping my expectations at the bare minimum. Funny enough though.. yeah, those stripes aren't supposed to line up at all. They didn't on the Yamato, or in the animation. The hip parts being an issue isn't new though. I had issues with my Fire Valk's hips, and one of the internal die-cast connectors for the hip actually broke. It still stays on, because it's held on by more than just that part, but making those hip segments out of metal may not have been the best idea.
.jpg.f37d110382dea53bf5b2d5eb1d3e5d80.jpg)
-
-
That's a very sad thing to hear, but very logical and likely scenario. 😕 Yea I thought I'd try to comb through the earlier pages of the thread last night for a pic of the grey prototype (because I was interested in Bandai's earlier approach), but got only as far as the 15th page before falling asleep. LOL... no worries.
-
😅Take your time! No rush at all!
-
Your Most Recent General Toy Purchase - 2024 Edition
Negotiator replied to azrael's topic in Anime or Science Fiction
Thank you McFarlane for selling out on your crappy version and forcing me to get this one...even tho I'm 3 years late. Got it unopened for a good deal.
- 799 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- toys
- just purchased
- (and 13 more)
-
Oh man, you're tempting me to push this up in my review cycle.
- Yesterday
-
Too bad the image provided by Bandai doesn't show the top portion of the incorrect shoulder. The erroneous proportion of the shoulder shown looks like the pre-renewal (1st edition) shoulder which does not have a cutout on the top outer edges (for the super/fast packs). I just really hope it's not a case of pre-renewal molded shoulders in circulation... 🙄 Thank you @jenius for pics, 🙏.
-
Show us your autograph photos. From tv to movies.
Swann replied to Swann's topic in Anime or Science Fiction
Its the one to hunt. -
What rumor? I want to see Tron.
-
Oh yeah, I thought some had two right shoulders but if it's just a part swap, super easy fix.
-
https://twitter.com/MTM_025_8_S04/status/1971357252264276332 web-translated:
-
You forgot the third option... You could also track down the old Bandai 1/65, because it's probably much cheaper. I don't know if I can call the DX a "realistic" approach though, the weird shrinking/resizing/rearranging of the components just makes the entire torso look like it has no substance to even connect the legs to. I think that's more impactful than the skinny legs, really, since I feel like they managed to make the legs look decent on the 171. Reducing down the nose to the older style stub really feels like it breaks the design of everything below the chest, and the legs are just dangling, attached to nothing at all, because the nose section isn't there to give them something to connect to. It's just weird trying to blend the two.
-
In a way, we're getting the best of both worlds from an aesthetic protective. If you want something more like the show, track down the Yamato. If you want a more "realistic" approach, get the DX. If you were let down by the Yamato and want something like it but better, tweet Arcadia... But I think it sold like a turd for Yamato so don't hold your breath.
-
The Transformers Thread (licensed) Next
26662 replied to mikeszekely's topic in Anime or Science Fiction
...but only if we get a Misfits Airachnid to pose alongside.
- 17693 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- transformers
- toys
- (and 5 more)
-
Well, it's not me up against the wall since I'm not the one trying to reconcile it. I've stated more than once that I don't agree with them doing things that way. I'm just pointing out their rationale, what they've done with it, and just the fact that they do have such a rationale on their cards to play.
-
Basically, you're up against a wall of trying to reconcile the fact that the two look nothing alike in their respective series. They can draft up any harebrained lore explanation they like, it doesn't change what we see on screen with our own eyes. Reality is just that the aesthetics of the two series are incompatible. Writing it into the story doesn't change that for the viewers. If Bandai really was intent on retconning the size of the original, they shouldn't have renamed it in the first place, because it drew a dividing line between the designs, marking them as distinct craft. Trying to backpedal on that retcon now is a losing battle, and one of the major issues is just that the blended aesthetic is so schizophrenic. Doing a selective resize of the components to try and pass the 171 off as an original VF-17 just gives us a misshapen caricature like the doodle in the previous page, because the separate components are now all out of proportion with each other, and it fails miserably at actually giving the same aesthetic as the original in M7.
-
I dunno if "cost-effective" is the term to use with this Bandai decision of badly cosplaying a DX-171 mould into a DX-17. I reckon the more cost-effective and more common-sense thing for Bandai to rather do is to re-paint DX DYRL-1A Kaki into DX DYRL-1A Hikaru or DX DYRL-1A Max. oh, well...
