Jump to content

David Hingtgen

Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    17126

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by David Hingtgen

  1. David Hingtgen
    It's out enough that there's unboxing vids on youtube, commenting on the engines... Apparently 9 months wasn't enough time to change it from the sample they showed back in 2018.
  2. David Hingtgen
    I think I've come to the same conclusion as before----despite the zillion 3P Dinobots, there's still none I really like in dino mode (the most important mode). They all have some stupid deal-killing design decision (or two or three).
  3. David Hingtgen
    Are there any side-by-side comparison pics for Graviter vs Stomp in dino mode? (Gigapower's vs FT's Sludge). I rank dino-mode as the most important thing for a dinobot, but I seem to be in the minority. I'd also be very interested in the same thing for their Snarls.
  4. David Hingtgen
    And so, the final retail release of the Armada Executor, seems to have doubled-down on the blue engines error. Now, instead of "ISD light blue" they're almost a deep royal blue. WTF. I mean, were they watching the VERY special edition or what?
  5. David Hingtgen
    Relevant, and still one of the oldest and funniest pics I know of from the 'net:
  6. David Hingtgen
    I don't recall any other colors in the aztec pattern either, hmmmn. Also---are the markings on the front half of the pylons engraved? They're either WAY too deep or painted with contrasting accent lines or something. There's no grooves on the pylons, the whole hull is pretty smooth on the D, any raised or depressed detail is subtle.
  7. David Hingtgen
    So, you have an LED color-changing tutorial for me?
  8. David Hingtgen
    How hard is it to change LED colors? Would like a magenta/purple one for Mirage. (and Revan!) What exact shape/size is used? And super-detailed soldering, or just "basic" skills?
  9. David Hingtgen
    Give me a resonably-sized/priced Unicron, with his iconic beard, and I'm interested. I'm not interested in a 30-in (deeper than any shelf or chest I own) $$$$$$$ square-chinned version.
  10. David Hingtgen
    Saw my first F-35C today. The beefy nosegear looks better, I think.
  11. David Hingtgen
    A. Intentional for the laughs. B. Considered it, but doesn't have the right tone.
  12. David Hingtgen
  13. David Hingtgen
    I noticed those were some big-ass GBU's under the wings when Maverick rolled inverted----not sure a Hornet (or any plane) can do that with that kind of load.
  14. David Hingtgen
    Thread needs more pics: Anyone got a screen cap of Ian McKellan? That one's gold.
  15. David Hingtgen
    I hadn't thought of it that way, but you're probably right. Makeup and costumes for the dozens of characters shown would add up quickly. They CG *everything* now, even for something as basic as "stock footage of a helicopter flying over a desert", because it's cheaper to CG it from scratch, than to license the actual stock footage... Is Taylor Swift the only one wearing shoes? That looked odd, when all the others were "naked"...
  16. David Hingtgen
    The "every Hornet in the formation gets a vapor cone" shot looked pretty fake to me.
  17. David Hingtgen
  18. David Hingtgen
    Yeah, new pics show my fear was unfounded---it's a full sphere.
  19. David Hingtgen
    Yeah, a LOT of people miss that the Refit Constitution has kind of a 2-stage deflector "light-up-sequence"---it glows dim yellow for a second, then "brightens up into a blue".
  20. David Hingtgen
    I don't buy that adding some very small phaser strips right at their edge, required completely new pylons. Maybe if they were changing the pylons anyways, they could have taken the opportunity to add phasers to the design. But not vice-versa.
  21. David Hingtgen
    I have a sneaking suspicion the back of the planet isn't all there, that it's flat/sliced off, kind of like the bottom of the old toy. Would love to be proved wrong, but a few angles seem like "I should be able to see 'further around the bend' but I can't".
  22. David Hingtgen
    Eh, they intentionally altered the E, it wasn't "just because of the impossibility of making a perfectly correct CG from a real model". The nacelles were moved up and forward. In-universe, the only explanation would be that it got new pylons for some reason, that are slightly different, after the Borg battle. And considering how "built-in" the pylons are on the Sovereign, that seems like a heck of a lot of drydock-work for little/no reason. (that we know of---MAYBE it alters the warp field characteristics of the Sovereign class a worthwhile amount?) (The addition of the little saucer-fillets makes NO sense however--that almost seems like it was done to kill the saucer-separation feature, even though it'd been designed in from the start---it's like they decided "well, we haven't done it yet, so let's make it impossible by fusing the area together and retcon that it never could") Adding a few little extra phaser strips and torp launchers, are minor, practical, and expected mods done during wartime. But completely replacing the pylons with nigh-identical ones?
  23. David Hingtgen
    Good, because it looked terrible. I think the ERTL 4in diecast one all those years ago had a better shape. Regardless of the actual lighting and DETAILS, just the raw shape of the ship was off, which is inexcusable. "Don't post direct side-by-side studio-model and screen-shots for comparison in your ads, when it's not very favorable to your product"
  24. David Hingtgen
    Don't they know every TNG fan, the first thing they look for, is Ten-Forward? After the bridge, it was where most dialogue occurred... Anways---they do get big points for the proper copper-bronze colors, when powered-down. (Not that you ever saw it much, but that is correct)
  25. David Hingtgen
    Win10.
×
×
  • Create New...