Jump to content

twich

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1401

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by twich

  1. twich
    So, I have a bit of a problem that I am hoping someone here in the community could help me with. I have the Bandai DX Chogokin VF-1J Armored Valkyrie set that came with the GBP-1S armor and VF-1J. For only the second time since getting this, I decided to change it to Battroid and put on the GBP armor. much to my surprise, I am missing the intake cover piece for the left leg. Does anyone know of someone or somewhere that I might get a replacement? I have scoured my house looking for the missing piece, to no avail. Any help would be greatly appreciated! here is an included picture to show what I am missing. Thanks! Twich -update! Found the piece 15 feet away and under a cabinet on the floor! The gremlins must be playing tricks on me!
  2. twich
    is this something you might do one of your Youtube Videos reviews on? Or is it considered taboo? Eagerly anticipating your next videos! Twich
  3. twich
    And their duplicate site Gundamit.com Twich
  4. twich
    So, it appears this version is $147.99 full price, which is cheaper than what we are seeing Valkyrie Factory sets for now, and no stand included! Twich
  5. twich
    I too would like to see that! Twich
  6. twich
    Really it is a KO of multiple Arcadia/Yamato products, since in the deluxe version we get a launch arm stand too. I too am curious if this is a name change for Valkyrie Factory or if someone else got a hold of the molds for a V.2 of a 1/60 VF-1. im curious how much tampo printing we will get, or if will include any stickers. Glow in the dark super parts are very cool, though. Twich
  7. twich
    Looking closer, it says Fugu Model, but it might be Valkyrie Factory using a different tag…..it sure looks like a 1/60 KO. Twich
  8. twich
    Does anyone know about the company that is making this? I think it is absolutely awesome that they are offering super parts plus the launch arm thingie in the deluxe offering! I have paid my $1 to ShowZstore, but a google search turned up nothing. Thanks, Twich
  9. twich
    Just amazing how tiny the VF-1 is compared to every Variable Fighter that followed it, save the VF-5000 and VF-9 Twich
  10. twich
    You are lucky sir! That is about my only problem with the reissue VF-31AX Hayate use. That and the folding knives won’t stay attached behind the arm shields! Twich
  11. twich
    I hope that this will be available post launch, as I didn’t get in on the pre-order. Might be nice to see at e-trailers like BBTS, .etc Twich
  12. twich
    Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn’t the SV-262 have an ISC that stores 30.8G? So, isn’t it a little better by 0.8G. I thought someone said that it was developed from the YF-29 ISC, but I maybe mistaken. Twich
  13. twich
    Looks like it might also have diecast feet….might be wrong though. Twich
  14. twich
    Anyone else notice the misprint and coverup? Could it be they printed a card for another Macross Zero VF-0 variant and were not prepared to announce it yet? A Shin use VF-0A perhaps? Inquiring/hopeful minds can hope/dream…. Twich
  15. twich
    This is just a general ask, and frankly, I’m kicking myself for not asking this before. Is there any publications or statistic listings for the variable fighters from Macross II? More specifically, how much better is the Metal Siren than the VF-2SS? What is the engine output and thrust? Also, why do we not have the same info about the VF-2JA? I know that MMM and Macross Compendium List the thrust output for the main engines of the VF-2SS, but nothing else…. Just wishing on a prayer, I guess….. Twich
  16. twich
    Yes, Reissue version. Sorry that I did not clarify that before. Twich
  17. twich
    I just received my copy of this from Mandarake. Comparing to my VF-31AX Mirage Custom, this toy is light years better. The tabs go right in, no trimming needed. The only “thing” is the mini-gun pods not tabbing in all the way and the inherent looseness at the wing roots. I think this is a design flaw and not something that can be fixed. I have just handles it a little, have not transformed it yet. Have to say that my initial impression is a good one. Twich
  18. twich
    I figured that it was probably misaligned, or jostled. I am looking forward to this, also really looking forward to your review of it Jenius! Twich
  19. twich
    The landing gear seems to be pretty well detailed as well. Looks like the gunpod will touch the ground though, unless that display is mistransformed. Twich
  20. twich
    Now I know from being on these boards for almost 2 decades and from discussions, humans, as of the late 2060's can synthesize fold carbon rather well, but still lack the ability to synthesize fold quartz. The fold carbon is present on the base line VF-31, and I may assume incorrectly, but is located next to the monitor turret on the spine of the fighter craft. I also recall you translating the fact that in the VF-31AX Variable Fighter Master File that one of the versions of the YF-29 had Fold Carbon in place of Fold Quartz to try to get the tap on the limitless energy from fold space to power the Energy Conversion Armor in all modes and power the weapons and boost the engine output to try to match the YF-29 that SMS let Alto use in the last battle with the Varja. Very interesting stuff. Twich
  21. twich
    Check out the gap in the forearms…..seems the lower arm might split apart to hide the hand, kind of reminds me of their Hi Metal R VF-2SS toy. Twich
  22. twich
    Not that I have read any Gundam books, but in my mind, Minofsky(sp?) particles where explained away in the same nebulous way that Robotech explained Protoculture fueling their Very-tech’s. All the gundam shows that I have seen use the particle field as a way to obscure sensors and to show where mobile suits have been and done battle. This explanation is rather interesting. Thank you for showing us this neat little nugget. Twich
  23. twich
    So I am curious about this “floating” VF-1…..Is it just a thin plastic shell with magnets in the bottom to create the repelling effect from the base? Seems an interesting desk ornament. Twich
  24. twich
    Sorry, was not trying to sound snarky with that response, but for me, the cost of shipping it from HK does come into effect, for the overall "inexpensiveness" of the toy. I meant to flush out my initial response by saying that if BBTS or similar e-tailer were to sell this new, cheaper packaged VF-1 for $90, then that is what I would consider to be a good deal. The $190 for the three toys is a "good deal". The cost of shipping though is a bit of a deal breaker. Twich
  25. twich
    well, when the cost of the shipping is equal to, or greater than the cost of the toy itself....... Twich
×
×
  • Create New...