areaseven Posted March 4, 2005 Posted March 4, 2005 I swear, what's with this string of bad movies we're getting this year? This is Sony's weak attempt at copying Charlie's Angels and So Close. D.E.B.S. [This message will self-destruct in about 20 replies...]
That NOS Guy Posted March 4, 2005 Posted March 4, 2005 What's that Lassie? Cute girls with no plot? Jimmie's going to see it regardless? Corporate hacks make movies? That's a good girl, go get the C4.
Hikuro Posted March 4, 2005 Posted March 4, 2005 oooooooooooooohhhhhhh that lassie wait....I see something......lassie....wait your a?! .....*insert diabolical music here*
Dangard Ace Posted March 4, 2005 Posted March 4, 2005 Ooooo....mmmm.....short skirts.....mmm......jailbait........mmm.....prison term.....WHAT?!
Pat Payne Posted March 4, 2005 Posted March 4, 2005 I swear, what's with this string of bad movies we're getting this year? This is Sony's weak attempt at copying Charlie's Angels and So Close.D.E.B.S. [This message will self-destruct in about 20 replies...] OK, everyboody...now THIS has to be worse than "The Phantom Menace..." right?
Dat Pinche Haro! Posted March 4, 2005 Posted March 4, 2005 Is this a sequel to B.A.P.S.? wouldn't doubt it altho...those girls would be the only reason why i'd even watch the movie...
Ghadrack Posted March 4, 2005 Posted March 4, 2005 They should have called it Fox Force Four and then they could have cashed in on a quasi-Tarentino dialog rip off and the girl crime fighter team cliche. Damn I need to be involved in the marketting department of a sleazy movie studio...
Godzilla Posted March 4, 2005 Posted March 4, 2005 The only reason to see it is to see the chicks. Another movies using hot chick and possibly some sexual themes with T&A to cover up the crappiness of the script. No I wont go see it. Not worth the $7.
Duke Togo Posted March 4, 2005 Posted March 4, 2005 This would be good if Schwarzenegger were in it. Oh, who am I kidding, nothing with Schwarzenegger in it is good.
areaseven Posted March 5, 2005 Author Posted March 5, 2005 I forgot to mention that two of the chicks were from The Fast and the Furious movies. Jordana Brewster (who's actually pretty hot) was in the first film while Devon Aoki (the fugly daughter of Benihana owner Rocky Aoki) was in 2 Fast 2 Furious.
Fatalist Posted March 5, 2005 Posted March 5, 2005 I swear, what's with this string of bad movies we're getting this year? This is Sony's weak attempt at copying Charlie's Angels and So Close.D.E.B.S. [This message will self-destruct in about 20 replies...] Sony's weak attempt at copying Charlies Angels? Sony MADE Charlies Angels 1 and 2.
Sebastian Posted March 5, 2005 Posted March 5, 2005 HAHAHAHA Anyways, Charlies Angels sucked soooo bad. The second movie was just too much. Relly pathetic. Whow can this be worst than that I wonder?
Noriko Takaya Posted March 5, 2005 Posted March 5, 2005 I forgot to mention that two of the chicks were from The Fast and the Furious movies. Jordana Brewster (who's actually pretty hot) was in the first film while Devon Aoki (the fugly daughter of Benihana owner Rocky Aoki) was in 2 Fast 2 Furious. Yes, Devon Aoki is pretty fugly. And this movie will suck the big one.
Feyd-Rautha Posted March 5, 2005 Posted March 5, 2005 i thought sombody said there were cute chicks.. all i see is four frumpy freaks lookin rufff.....
gerwalk25 Posted March 5, 2005 Posted March 5, 2005 TEEN GIRL SQUAD!! Cheerleader, So and So, What's Her Face, The Ugly One!
areaseven Posted March 5, 2005 Author Posted March 5, 2005 Sony's weak attempt at copying Charlies Angels? Sony MADE Charlies Angels 1 and 2. Yeah, and Sony released So Close in the U.S.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now