Cyclone Posted January 2, 2005 Share Posted January 2, 2005 There is a reason why I frequently keep my hopes for comics/animation/video game to movie conversions low. Life is so much simplier... Cyc (who wonders why the lowest quality DVDs are the soonest to go out of print and reach 300% above RRP on ebay, ie Aeon Flux and MST3K Movie) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yang_Neumann Posted January 2, 2005 Share Posted January 2, 2005 They made her look like Yasmin Blech! I second that... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yang_Neumann Posted January 2, 2005 Share Posted January 2, 2005 ...(who wonders why the lowest quality DVDs are the soonest to go out of print and reach 300% above RRP on ebay, ie Aeon Flux and MST3K Movie) Gotta part company with ya on that one Cyclone. I don't see Ghost World flying off the shelves the Love it or hate it, Peter Chung's character design is unique enough to make up for the lack of story. But the bottom line is this is one of those titles that will not translate well when making the move to live action. Just look at his other works, (Riddick, Alexander, and Matriculated) and thank the Gods he actually had something to work with to back up his animation. I'm not hating on the guy. After all, he's come a long way since his days at Disney as an animation checker and background artist. I just think it's a big mistake to make this entertaining, yet confusing title into a movie. Then again, it could be worse; Fox can still threaten to produce a live action DBZ movie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sabretooth Posted January 3, 2005 Share Posted January 3, 2005 i thought they were.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sundown Posted January 3, 2005 Share Posted January 3, 2005 Kate Beckinsdale is hot, but not an action star at all she really sucks in action movies. Odd. I thought her action scenes in Underworld were fantastic. Oozed style, confidence, and moved like a girl that wasn't about to trip over herself. I've also heard that the scenes of her with steely gaze while shooting firearms is actually her with steely gaze while shooting firearms-- a rarity supposedly, since most actors flinch to some degree. Supposedly that's also part of the reason for the sunglasses in Matrix-- to hide flinching eyes. Her physicality is pretty admirable, especially for an actress that can actually act. Anyway, I'd take either Beckingsale or Theron over the andgrogynous abomination that starred in the original animation. Go figure. -Al Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EXO Posted January 3, 2005 Share Posted January 3, 2005 Anyway, I'd take either Beckingsale or Theron over the andgrogynous abomination that starred in the original animation. Go figure.-Al Yeah, they'd have to get that old chick from Just Shoot Me to get an accurate Aeon Flux looking gal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Valkyrie Posted January 3, 2005 Share Posted January 3, 2005 I rather see Kate Beckinsale as Catwoman, if they take her for new Batman Begins sequels Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warmaker Posted January 3, 2005 Share Posted January 3, 2005 Kate Beckinsdale is hot, but not an action star at all she really sucks in action movies. Odd. I thought her action scenes in Underworld were fantastic. Oozed style, confidence, and moved like a girl that wasn't about to trip over herself. I've also heard that the scenes of her with steely gaze while shooting firearms is actually her with steely gaze while shooting firearms-- a rarity supposedly, since most actors flinch to some degree. Supposedly that's also part of the reason for the sunglasses in Matrix-- to hide flinching eyes. Her physicality is pretty admirable, especially for an actress that can actually act. Kate Beckinsale can keep her steely gaze when I have her handcuffed to... Oops! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Jenius Posted January 3, 2005 Share Posted January 3, 2005 Kate Beckinsdale is hot, but not an action star at all she really sucks in action movies. Odd. I thought her action scenes in Underworld were fantastic. Oozed style, confidence, and moved like a girl that wasn't about to trip over herself. I've also heard that the scenes of her with steely gaze while shooting firearms is actually her with steely gaze while shooting firearms-- a rarity supposedly, since most actors flinch to some degree. Supposedly that's also part of the reason for the sunglasses in Matrix-- to hide flinching eyes. Her physicality is pretty admirable, especially for an actress that can actually act. Anyway, I'd take either Beckingsale or Theron over the andgrogynous abomination that starred in the original animation. Go figure. -Al I didn't mind her acting at all. I just found her action scenes in Underworld and to some extent Van Helsing(crappy anyway... or as I like to call it Underworld II: Because Underworld Didn't Suck Enough). Her steely gaze looks to me like she's confused as she trudges aimlessly through various shooting galleries. I was looking forward to Underworld, but I just found her disappointing in an already disappointing movie. I'd rewatch it to maybe see what it is you're talking about but I distinctly recall a noticeable lack of style on her part. Its cool that she doesn't' flinch, but there's no "wow" factor for me when she's killing em. I haven't seen Blade Trinity, but I'd rather watch I and II ten times over Underworld/Helsing anyday. I'd go back and check if I'm mistaken, but that would mean I'd have to get around the plot of the movie first. Frankly about halfway through the film I turned to my buddy and was like "Man, I know why I don't like this movie; I'm not some 14 year old, fat wannabe goth chick." Seriously... the coolest part of the movie IMHO was the dude doing the "brain liquefy punch" on that other vamp. She is a good actress, but I think the UW script was so piss poor, even she couldn't save it. I totally agree with you on Beckinsdal/Theron > Androgynous Abomination. Phantom 2040 = suck Aeon Flux = suck Reign = suck Did I miss anything? Aren't those all by the same dude or animation studio? I hate anorexic, androgynous, ugly things running around trying to pass themselves off as human. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sabretooth Posted January 3, 2005 Share Posted January 3, 2005 i agree to an extent i liked aeon flux back at a halloween party i went to in hollywood in 99 there was a chick dressed up as aeon and she looked PERFECT same outfit , same hair, same body type total hotness Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone Posted January 3, 2005 Share Posted January 3, 2005 ...(who wonders why the lowest quality DVDs are the soonest to go out of print and reach 300% above RRP on ebay, ie Aeon Flux and MST3K Movie) Gotta part company with ya on that one Cyclone. I don't see Ghost World flying off the shelves the I meant lowest quality in regards to visual/authoring of disc, not content. It does occur to me that her hair like that makes her almost look like Ash from Avalon... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sundown Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 I didn't mind her acting at all. I just found her action scenes in Underworld and to some extent Van Helsing Come on, you gotta like when she jumped, landed, and strutted away eeriely without missing a beat (if I remember the scene right). Slick! Could be that the action scenes needed better choreography... but I do really like how she moves, and the way she struts and runs with efficency, confidence and purpose. She's not flailing, unbalanced, and akward like so many starlets pushed into action roles. I dunno, I kinda find the old Just Shoot Me chick vaguely attractive... They could always pick up Carrie Anne Moss for the Aeon Flux role. She had that androgynous thing going pretty good in the last few Matrix movies, and it'd be a lot more accurate visually. But then I wouldn't watch it. -Al Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent ONE Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 I'll give it a chance, Theron has never done a sh!tty movie that I know of. I think you fanboys are too critical... of just about everything. Underworld was lame, but you can NOT compare the acting tallents of Theron and Beckensale... Charlize is 20 times better an ACTRESS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areaseven Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 Theron has never done a sh!tty movie that I know of. Well, The Astronaut's Wife put me to sleep... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent ONE Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 Theron has never done a sh!tty movie that I know of. Well, The Astronaut's Wife put me to sleep... Oh yeah, that Jonny Depp movie. That was a long time ago, I can forgive that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bsu legato Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 I've only seen a couple of episodes of the old series, but these pictures do absolutely nothing for me. All I can see is that they've actually found a way to make Charlize unattractive (with the exception of Monster-esque makeup). Did I say "unattractive?" I meant "futuristic." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tetsujin Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 As for Theron being skinny... she's not really, it's just that she doesn't have a huge... rack. Even without a big *rack*, she looked really good in 2 Days in the Valley. I love the animation and I'd love for them to do this as theatrical animation... I love well-done animation, and I'd love to see more of it. But that's not happening. Too bad. As for the rack... If they're going live-action it's got to be a compromise. I'd rather have her look real than have her padded up like Angelina Jolie as Lara Croft. Boobs don't have to be huge to look good. But she's gotta have the trademark hair, IMO. On the other hand, it's an adaptation. Photos aren't going to tell me much about how well the good points of the original have been carried over. The hair, the oufit, those things aren't going to make or break the movie. What I love about the original is that it's fun, a little kinky, and always weird. I like how the old material is sometimes a bit cryptic (like the repetition in "Tide") and I like Aeon's knack for self-defeat. Some of the TV-safe fanservice on the original and the TV-series is almost embarassingly cheap, (Like all the "oh, my god, she's totally bisexual and doing it with that girl sometimes!" stuff.) but it's still fun. The problem is, "sexy girl with guns" has been done to death in the movies. It's cheap as hell, it's outright devalued. Some films get extra points for being clever, not taking themselves too seriously, or whatever. What's this movie going to do, or have, that'll set it apart and make it worthwhile? What's it going to have for people like me, who love the original and want to see some of that reflected in the movie? That's what counts. Some variation of the Aeon clone story from the TV show might be good for the basis of a movie... that was a very 'accessible' story with lots of dialogue, but it was still very much Aeon Flux IMO. You have weirdos like Scafandra and the border crossing scenario, and Aeon even dies at the end. If they did something like Sybil's spinal gap that would make for interesting (if inevitably cheesy) CGI as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warmaker Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 (edited) You can't have Theron with the Aeon style hair. It'll look stupid in film. Animation? Ok. With an actual actress? It won't look right. This is also the same reason that making film costumes exactly match comic book character outfits is usually a bad idea. You can't make it look right for most characters/outfits. Edited January 4, 2005 by Warmaker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
do not disturb Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 I'll give it a chance, Theron has never done a sh!tty movie that I know of. I think you fanboys are too critical... of just about everything.Underworld was lame, but you can NOT compare the acting tallents of Theron and Beckensale... Charlize is 20 times better an ACTRESS. devils advocate, yeah that was a winner wasn't it? outside of the hot redhead getting full frontal, that movie/acting sucked sweaty rhino testies. regardless, shes a friggin hottie! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tetsujin Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 You can't have Theron with the Aeon style hair. It'll look stupid in film. Animation? Ok. With an actual actress? It won't look right. I know an adaptation has to be a compromise. I said so. And in X-Men, for instance, I think discarding the costumes was a good idea for exactly the reasons you cited. It's just that as it is she looks so generic. It's way too soon to know how this thing is going to turn out, of course, but with nothing else to go on, I just find myself wishing there were some kind of stronger tie to the old material. Why? Because until the movie somehow makes itself distinguished, the tie with the original Aeon Flux material is all that separates it from the sea of crap that follows a similar formula. That said, I do believe it would be possible for someone to have Aeon Flux hair, or Aeon Flux-esque hair, and not look stupid. I know that doesn't necessarily mean it's the right decision for the film. See paragraph one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areaseven Posted December 4, 2005 Share Posted December 4, 2005 So, did anyone here watch this movie? How bad was it? Rotten Tomatoes Rating (as of 12/3): 13% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myk Posted December 4, 2005 Share Posted December 4, 2005 Did you see it? I'll watch it if you will, although I'm not too enthusiastic about a movie that has a spot in the Rotten Tomatoes site... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghadrack Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 Two of my buddies from work went to see it this weekend, they both told me not to waste my time, even if it was on television and I was home sick with nothing else to watch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent ONE Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 I want to see it still. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hikuro Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 I didn't like the animated series on MTV.......I didn't care for animation style, or story, I was too young to understand it, and because of that I'm choosing not to even see the movie....the trailers turn me off completely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macross73 Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 i haven't seen and wont bother too. its not the same as the animated compromises or not. i'll buy the DvD once i get the chance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UN Spacy Posted December 6, 2005 Author Share Posted December 6, 2005 What is it with Oscar winning actresses doing shitty movies after they've won? Halle Berry had Catwoman and now this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent ONE Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 What is it with Oscar winning actresses doing shitty movies after they've won?... 349857[/snapback] $$$ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EXO Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 It's not like they were pure gold before they got an Oscar. It just means they had that one really good role that got enough attention. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myk Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 Well, that answers my question as to why Charlize would be a guest hostess for Spike TV's "video game awards show." I see her, or at least hope to see her, signing a contract with Vivid pictures in the near future... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EXO Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 Well, that answers my question as to why Charlize would be a guest hostess for Spike TV's "video game awards show."Â I see her, or at least hope to see her, signing a contract with Vivid pictures in the near future... 349918[/snapback] Wouldnt that be to pimp her movie and video game to the target audience? I don't understand what the big mystery is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myk Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 (edited) There was no mystery, I was being disrespectful to Charlize... -Oh, and it will take far more than parading around on Spike's VGA show, a 2 hour commercial blitz for the video game industry, to gain any favor for that....."movie" she just released... Edited December 6, 2005 by myk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myk Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 What is it with Oscar winning actresses doing shitty movies after they've won? Hollywood is pretty cruel to women. Men have it easier with age. Sean Connery just becomes a bigger and bigger pimp as time goes on. The women however just get booted to the curb. 349995[/snapback] And who says that art doesn't faithfully imitate life? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.