No, it didn't. Neither decision said anything explicit about the derivatives at all. People here have interpreted the copyright split to come out either way on which company has what rights to make derivatives (and, more to the point, release them internationally).
You can read the two district court cases in only the last few pages pretty easily. The oldest one is above, and the newer one is only a few pages back (or look at Wrylac's sig since he links to them both).
I'd love to see what cwbrown has to say about what is implied in the Jan03 ruling.
Hey wrlac, no flamebaiting please. I really don't want to see this thread get as ugly as the other one did.