Uhhh... sure. Don't allow for ridiculous amounts of ammo. "Real life" limiting how many weapons and how much ammunition a solider can carry at any one given time sure adds a lot of realism. Making damage that really counts is realistic. One or two hits and your a dead man. In such a game, you will quickly become the dumbass that runs around gunning to the dumbass that's dead.
Anyways, this is a console game. The only good FPS are PC one's anyhow. PC's allow for more diversity of functions that translate to more tactics one can employ. Also, consoles as far as I know have too much limitation on the maximum of number of players. When I hit the battlefield, I want a battle, not some pea shooter between a few people.
vinnie <---- uncurably hooked on "real war" FPS.
And that is fine that you think that way.
But it doesnt always have to be "realistic" to have a good FPS.
I never bash anything till I actually play it myself.