Jump to content

MichaelS

Members
  • Posts

    410
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by MichaelS

  1. Is that VF-4 on the right another resin prototype or preproduction plastic? And one other thing I thought the VF-4G was a late mod like '40 era shouldn't it be flying a NUNS label instead of UN spacey?
  2. evry time I come back here I am always blown away, please keep it up.
  3. Yeah from the talk here a highly dynamic OVA M+, M zero style look would be a very nice break/change from thelong all most grind of MF, M7.
  4. Did anybody else wonder way the back half of the robots head was removeable, it is laying on the bubble rap in lower right side.
  5. Thank you for your responses, and would love to see more interviews by SK.
  6. How far are you planning on going with this? Any chace of a VF-4 next?
  7. From the talk on this forum I would love to see it. I liked M+ alot it was a good departure from main stream macross like a day in the life of non colonist macross.
  8. Has there been any real talk of this becoming a OVA like macross plus?
  9. More VF-4G porn pics please! What a wonderful fighter profile that is, cant wait to see a full transformation set of a production model.
  10. Hey Sketchley where did you get that info from? Also why dies the VF-4 not have internal micro missle launchers?
  11. But I could see where it would be a nice inclusion as spare kinda like pylon weapons and gunpod, I am starting to think that is also wishful thinking.
  12. But that does not make any mention of airframe aerodynamic changes which is now obvious in FB 2012 version and VF-4G. Also note that Yamato's VF-4G does not have the anti-aircraft head.
  13. You know what now the back ground info needs to change on the VF-4G per mech manual only differance between VF-4G and VF-4 is engine swap, but with SK approval of VFX model there is now an aerodynamics change as well.
  14. I wonder what changed SK mind about not coming back to macross but greatly expanding the universe.
  15. I would love to see the VF-4! Any more pics of the arm and hanger of the 1/144 scale?
  16. LOL now I was trying to compare differance in FB2012 and VFX VF-4's not bridge bunnies
  17. links that I have: http://www.macrossworld.com/2655/outlook-for-the-2012-version-of-the-vf-4-lightning-not-so-good/ ,
  18. I dont think anybody has or at least never heard anybody talk about it but Yamato had already owed a VFX license for awhile without spending anymore money.
  19. I will get at least two it has beed the VF that I have most wanted I dont care what color or stickers come with, if I can afford it I will buy more. I hope that with the success of this toy they will be encouraged to acquire more licenses for differant models.
  20. Please reread the posts about what they are building the VFX Vf-4 not the FB2012 VF-4 there is a youtube video that shows the VF-4G and it appears to be correct to that model that is the only license they have.
  21. At this point the origami VF-4 needs no more folds in my opinion but why not hope for the best.
  22. Ok so I found a YouTube video of the VF-4 in VFX and it appears that the fins on this toy are correct to the game model which they said many time is what they build not FB or line art but VFX. I will own this valk. They will have to change the fins and probly something else for FB2012 to be correct.
×
×
  • Create New...