Jump to content

Xigfrid

Members
  • Posts

    2601
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Xigfrid

  1. I was speaking only about the prototype, i don't know yet how that would scale as a finished product/kit. I hope not that high though.
  2. I have been working on this project non stop for 2 weeks to get the prototype 3D printed, I am now resting a bit from this project. To let you know, It is about 2 and 2.5 more expensive to print than the fighter drone. That means that making a more complex or bigger thing than this X-9 would be very difficult using this process (shapeways for validating prototype, printing in higher resolution resin, recasting, then painting) ! Anyway, the prototype is coming in the next weeks, so if everything is right from this step I will look into the next ones.
  3. exciting update, the model is finished and in its way to 3D printing!
  4. The handling is expensive on small models. So if you can put 2 or 4 nubs in one model that would shave a LOT of the price. But the model needs to be 1 only part, so you got to somehow link each nubs together (with 0,8mm diameter wires by example). I don't know if you can use one side of the nubs to get them linked. As this side, where we will cut the wire, would have to be un-perfectly sanded, it must not be a key form. Just tell me if you can do that so I can hold a little or not
  5. Last time I checked, the shapeways's link was down, Now, I will grab a few, do we need 2 to repair one battroid ? Thanks for the guide !
  6. I see a leg in the green+blue+grey parts, pretty much like a VF-117. Then the tip of the wing can either fold into the inner of the leg, or retract in the back of the battroid mode ala VF-25.
  7. almost finished the gears, what a relief!
  8. You should check http://www.shapeways.com/shops/unicornfairyshop
  9. I have no definitive plans for the 1:72 scale, but at 90% it won't have the landing gears, then bottom wing can be fixed, that means a larger bottom part. No way it would be cheap, but cheaper than the 1:60 yes
  10. The optional gears are a very complex part of the design, this is why I study it last. So far, everything is clear for the moment: the main body comes with cavities, the cavity is closed by the gear traps, everything is so far recast in resin. The traps however would need some nail vernish to stay in place or just power glue them in place to close the cavities. Then for those how want the optional landing gears, things go pretty wilde, for the front landing gear you will need: -a 3D printed part would be glued to the resin trap -this is going to be articulated with another plastic 3D printed part to make the trap movable. There goes the rod between the two parts. -the landing gear main body is 3D printed in stainless steel -cover it with the rubber tire -assemble the landing gear into a third plastic part that perfectly grip to the cavity sides, this part is in yellow. and voila you got a complicated mechanism, but keeping things pretty cheap.
  11. Sometime we think that we got plenty of space... the truth is often the opposite!
  12. This one is super clean! All the more considering that it comes from the smaller scale! Nice job
  13. Did you meant the sprues? The 3D parts are entirely designed, even the sprues
  14. Yes, still working on it, I still deciding on details for this one
  15. Thats great, I really like my proto copy but these will be nicer, I can't wait
  16. Thanks Lets resume all the features that have been implemented at this point: -materials, the model is planned to be casted in resin, a few moving parts would be directly printed in plastic for resistance. They will be hidden, so no painting. -metal! some use of metal rod for the landing gears trap movement (optional), and ...screws! -NO glue needed for assembly, everything is tightened by 4 screws. The screws are hidden (in the landing gears, missile compartiment and under the top/front circle cover) -retractable wings, they "clip" in deployed position -rotating eye so that it can look trough the 3 windows -But I don't know how to move if the clear canopy is installed- -the eye is large enough to receive a red tritium vial if desired (3mm diameter recommended) -clear canopy to cover the eye -retractable bottom wing so that the X-9 can realistically land. The bottom wing "clips" in deployed and retractable position -opening missile traps: they "clip" in closed and open position so more display options! Still working on: -optional retractable landing gears, should have rubber tires, but not rotating -a first in macross story if I succeed to make a directional front landing gear -missile scaffolding for mini-HMM + numerous HMMs -I will probably make another scaffolding for the standard HMMs from Arcadia YF-19
  17. I had time to finish a few parts today, now working on smaller details!
  18. I am pretty sure these would fit, wouldn't they? https://www.shapeways.com/product/J4UD2XE7N/yf-29-head-turret-1-pair?li=search-results-1&optionId=6800104&rc=SearchResults
  19. I measured it from tip to nose: 18,50 cm. As this measure is actually a diagonal, the drone is a little shorter.
  20. I think so or the original resin could also be used so it would end seamless. Anyway I am satisfied with what I see, looking back at how difficult this wing is to be casted. Ultimately, the lesson is now learnt, for the X-9 I am going with more parts, more complex designs in order to obtain a straight forward recasting process.
  21. They look nice! The wing is really nice and smooth but there are a few bits of resin missing on this wing though
  22. Incredible for a pen work, it really is like a airbrush work. How did you paint the head the color is perfectly matching!
×
×
  • Create New...