Jolly Rogers Posted March 30, 2004 Share Posted March 30, 2004 IMDb report Academy Award-winning producer-director Peter Jackson (The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King) has selected Jack Black (The School of Rock, Shallow Hal) to star opposite Naomi Watts in his remake of King Kong as the filmmaker-entrepreneur who captures the giant ape and brings him to New York as a freak-show attraction. The role was originally played by Robert Armstrong in the 1933 original and by Charles Grodin in the 1976 remake (although the character's name was changed and he became an oil executive). Proof that you don't need to be good looking or in shape to be a leading man next to the likes of Gwyneth Paltrow and Naomi Watts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Opus Posted March 30, 2004 Share Posted March 30, 2004 Does this movie really need to be made again? I'd rather see Jack Black as King Kong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anubis Posted March 30, 2004 Share Posted March 30, 2004 Meh, hurry up and finish so the Hobbit can be made. I was never a big King Kong fan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roy Focker Posted March 30, 2004 Share Posted March 30, 2004 I also thought Jackson and Black were related. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mechamaniac Posted March 30, 2004 Share Posted March 30, 2004 Surprised he's not making his acting/directorial debut by playing Kong as well. He's fat and hairy enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolly Rogers Posted March 30, 2004 Author Share Posted March 30, 2004 Meh, hurry up and finish so the Hobbit can be made. Don't hold your breath. Another studio has the rights to The Hobbit (I think it's Universal). Unless NewLine is able to work out a deal with them, Peter Jackson won't be able to make a movie based on The Hobbit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Shade Posted March 31, 2004 Share Posted March 31, 2004 I'd rather see Jack Black as King Kong. Now, that would make an interesting movie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent ONE Posted March 31, 2004 Share Posted March 31, 2004 Unless they totally change the story, it will be lame... King Kong is a slow lame story that is not to pace with modern entertainment. Just not enought of a story, even senseless violence added in would make it better so I hope thats the plan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eriku Posted March 31, 2004 Share Posted March 31, 2004 Hmm...I'm not that big of a fan of Jack Black or of King Kong, but putting them together sounds enticing for some reason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blaine23 Posted March 31, 2004 Share Posted March 31, 2004 I love Jack Black, but I can easily see why people don't. I get his humor and it makes me laugh. In others it just drives them nutty. How could anyone dislike the man who brought us such songs as Sasquatch with Tenacious D? Got me. I'm not sure if I'd call his role the male lead, either. He's really the heel of the piece - at least he is in the 76 version w/ Jessica Lange - maybe this version will have a heroic male lead, like Jeff Bridges was in the 76 version. Either way, Kong is really the male lead of the movie. And at least Jackson's remake looks like it'll be fun. I only hope this version doesn't have a giant door built into the wall around the village. Why build a wall to keep Kong out but build a giant door in it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graham Posted March 31, 2004 Share Posted March 31, 2004 Yeah...Jack Black as King Kong! Tenacious-Kong....LOL Graham Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.