Actually the F-18 has a shorter range and can carry less armaments compared to the F-14 (see this interesting article here)
The hornet does have a shorter range, and while the takeoff weight is less, the Hornet has more hardpoints.
But my big question is what does any of that have to do with what skull-1 said?
The Tomcat does need more maintnance time per flight hour than a Hornet, and the Tomcat is bigger, and efficiany in the military is measured in turnaround time, and maintance time, I don't have aclue what you're basing your thoughts on.
And if you're basing your efficiancy idea on fuel consumption the hornet has more efficianet engines,but the Tomcat carries more fuel
Do I think we should get rid of the Tomcat? No, not without a proper replacemet. I think the same thing about the Intruder.
hehe, it seems that my eyes decided to skip the words "spends more time in the shop per flight hour" when I was reading Skull-1's post...
I didn't know that F-14's were very maintenance hungry compared to F-18's... so Cheney's decision to kill the F-14 program is sorta more feasible now (I still don't like it though )
sad to see those beautiful babies go...