Jump to content

Seto Kaiba

Members
  • Posts

    13279
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Seto Kaiba

  1. So... current season stuff. Tonikaku Kawaii, localized as Tonikawa: Over the Moon for You, is apparently having its anime adaptation produced by Crunchyroll itself and marketed as a "Crunchyroll Original". I got all of about twenty seconds into the episode when my monitor lizard decided she wanted to take a dump the size of a birthday cake and had to be dissuaded from doing so on the kitchen floor. All told, fun and a little unconventional... it's odd to see a Japanese romcom where the male lead is so forward about things, a little too much so in Nasa's case. I look forward to seeing more, and really want an explanation for this bizarre premise.
  2. Finished Mob Psycho 100 tonight... not bad, but really not great IMO. It doesn't leave as strong an impression as One Punch Man did. The anarchic comedy is there, but Mob is hard to relate to because he's so deadpan almost all the time and, well, literally goes from 0-100 with little to no middle ground. Reigen's a lot of fun, mostly because he's a decent person but behaves like a wildly irresponsible jackass to the disappointment and frustration of everyone around him. Crunchyroll has dropped the first episodes of I'm Standing on a Million Lives, Iwakakeru - Sport Climbing Girls, and Tonikawa: Over the Moon for You, so those are next up for me.
  3. Yeah, Mission 3 feels the most like classic Dirty Pair... though I have to admit Mission 1's opening song is just an incredible earworm.
  4. All told, the ancient Protoculture's story was about a rather different kind of hubris. The Protoculture were absolutely the masters of what they created. It feels more like a Cold War allegory, since the two rival Protoculture factions/governments were so invested in the differences in their ideologies that they achieved mutually-assured destruction rather than accept that they were more alike than different and resolve their differences through mutual understanding and communication. To an engineer, though, the Protoculture's story reads a lot more like "we, as a civilization, never invented the FMEA".
  5. A fair point, I was just saying it's a missed opportunity to earn some nerd cred for their show from the Star Trek fans they're trying to attract back to the franchise after the net losses of the last two seasons.
  6. The "air" date for Discovery's 3rd season feels like a bit of a missed opportunity in hindsight... if it dropped on Sunday the 11th they would be debuting it on Federation Day, but it's dropping on the 15th. (Federation Day being the anniversary of the Federation's founding, October 11th being the date as per materials created for Star Trek: Generations.)
  7. More like a fundamental necessity of having been designed to be non-autonomous. One can only assume the ancient Protoculture were smarting a bit after their previous two brilliant ideas for fully autonomous living weapons ended up running out of control and left what little remained of their civilization fleeing for its collective life. Of course, it was only that one specific thing they seem to have learned from and they kept building stupidly dangerous sh*t and having to build increasingly complex containment structures to safeguard the brainchildren of their reckless idiocy from anyone who'd stumble on their handiwork after they were gone. Even with the Birdhuman requiring a flesh and blood pilot whom its onboard AI could interrogate about the current state of affairs on Earth, it still nearly destroyed the planet due to a premature activation that was only halted by it decapitating itself at some point in ancient history and again when Sara Nome woke it up in 2008.
  8. Nope... that's a bio-technological construct the ancient Protoculture left behind on Earth to monitor humanity's development in their absence, and destroy them in the event that they developed into a warlike race and acquired the technology for space travel. It's been said that the Protoculture based its design on the Vajra Queen's form. It had an onboard AI, but was dependent on the engineered fold song abilities of the Mayan islander priestesses for maintenance and needed a pilot in order to operate. That and the Fold Evil in Macross 30: Voices Across the Galaxy seem to be further developments of the same organic technology that went into the Evil-series bioweapons that became the Protodeviln. (One of the lessons learned seems to have been "make sure that thing requires a pilot to operate".)
  9. Eh... that'd be up to the writers of future Macross works. Defining "extinct" kind of changes the answer a bit when it comes to the Protoculture. Super Dimension Fortress Macross presented the Protoculture only in vague terms, as the Zentradi's long-vanished creators who had probably also created humanity. Macross: Do You Remember Love? put a different spin on things by revealing that the Zentradi (and Meltrandi) were Protoculture clones who had been genetically modified for use as a giant clone army. That would technically mean the Protoculture are arguably the most populous species in the galaxy in purely genetic terms, though their culture and society's long-since extinct since that stuff was all forbidden to the Zentradi. (Macross Chronicle's Protoculture worldguide sheet broadly supports the Zentradi's genetic template as being derived from the Protoculture's.) Macross 7 kind of drew a line under the idea that the Protoculture were largely wiped out in their civil war, and slowly went extinct hundreds of thousands of years before humanity emerged on the interstellar stage. Macross Frontier and Macross Delta have both generally supported that line, with the Brisingr globular cluster supposedly being the Protoculture's last enclave before they died out in the distant past. The Supervision Army is also still around, though it is not clear if that force still contains brainwashed Protoculture or is now made up exclusively of brainwashed Zentradi. Macross II: Lovers Again was the only story that toyed with the idea they might still be around in some fashion. The Mardook were strongly implied, but never explicitly stated, to be the descendants of a group of Protoculture who fled the collapse of their civilization like the ones who'd settled on Earth in the Macross: Do You Remember Love? movie. Unlike the Protoculture in the main Macross timeline who seem to have generally regretted their actions in destroying galactic civilization and turning loose two unstoppable clone armies and being content to hide out in increasingly remote places to avoid the wrath of their creations, the Mardook decided to be a bit more proactive about protecting their culture by destroying anything that would threaten it... including other cultures that might contaminate it (hence their war on Earth).
  10. Ah, I hadn't heard they were going back to finish up adapting the manga. I guess ending on "Welcome to our Xcution" was kind of a weird story arc to finish on... though I'm not sure adapting the "Thousand Year Blood War" arc is necessarily a kindness since that was Tite Kubo trying to kill off the manga in a way that prevented sequels so he could move on from it. He became a big fan of the audience punch in that part. I'm about halfway into Mob Psycho 100's second season. It's still not great, IMO, but it's pretty good. Feels a bit scattered, changing gears twice already from their usual exorcisms to hunting urban legends to dealing with problematic psychics again.
  11. Well, I finished the first season of Mob Psycho 100 a moment ago... kind of a weird genre shift it goes through, from a sort of slice of life about painfully introverted Mob to fighting a frankly ridiculous organization of evil psychics who never grew out of their 2nd year middle school syndrome. Not a bad show, overall, but IMO not as good or as compelling as One Punch Man. A solid 7/10 at the very least.
  12. I recall reading something to that effect, yeah. That kind of thing is fairly typical in cases like this, though. Like how FASA ignored YEARS of cease and desist notices before things finally boiled over in a lawsuit that nearly cost them their entire BattleTech franchise.
  13. Too late, they already did... the Robotech Masters chucked the Southern Cross designs completely for something that looks like the Great Value version of Mardook or DYRL Zentradi gear. The thirst is real. You can't deny, that was a weapons-grade outfit... the Mardook probably had a high incidence of neck-strain injuries from heads turning all the time.
  14. Very probably, yeah... given that CBS did at one point admit to access and copying in some of their filings. They argued that it was de minimis access and copying, though (i.e. too trivial an amount to merit consideration). I gave the game in question a whirl, and in my estimation they're not as similar as some of the articles make it out to be. There are a number of superficial/aesthetic similarities in terms of character art and the bare fact of a giant blue tardigrade that travels instantly through time and space, but it's mostly just at that superficial level. So, in all fairness, I can kind of see the case for arguing de minimis access and copying. They didn't have anything about an extradimensional plane of fungal life in Tardigrades the way they do in Star Trek: Discovery... the tardigrade in Discovery's more like a Navigator from Dune than the tardigrade in Tardigrades in terms of how it's used. Since there is at least some evidence to suggest Tardigrades may have inspired Discovery's first season, it would've been polite to throw him a bone and maybe a modest royalty check... but corporations seldom concern themselves with that kind of thing when IP rights are involved.
  15. Six episodes into Mob Psycho 100 and I'm still undecided about the series. Mob really feels like basically the same character as Saitama, except he's afraid of his overwhelming power instead of annoyed by the lack of challenge it confers. I definitely don't like Reigen. He's kind of an objectively awful person.
  16. To say nothing of hanging onto an average viewership of over 10 million the whole time... Discovery's third season is supposed to hit CBS All Access two weeks from Thursday. I've got no intention of reactivating my CBS All Access subscription for it, but it'll be interesting to see if there's any meat on the bones of the widely circulated theory that Discovery's third season developed its core premise from the unproduced Star Trek: Final Frontier animated series that was pitched back in 2006. That series pitch by David Rossi, Doug Mirabello, and José Muñoz featured a future Federation that was well into its decline after someone destroyed most of subspace with omega particle detonations. The promo materials for DSC's third season talk about an event called "the Burn" that apparently left most of the Federation's worlds cut off from each other and the USS Discovery's indicated to be a ship that isn't hindered by "the Burn" (due to its spore drive?) and can act more freely than what's left of Starfleet.
  17. As noted here and elsewhere, it was CBS themselves who promoted Discovery's introduction to their broadcast schedule as a series premiere and had it listed as a new episode in the TV listings. That would, at least in terms of how they chose to classify it, make it an apples-to-apples comparison with the first-run broadcast ratings for previous Star Trek titles. That it is technically a rerun is a fair point, albeit I would argue that its rerun status is largely negated by four key factors: Star Trek has, historically, seen consistently strong ratings performance in reruns due to the strength of its fanbase and broad appeal. Star Trek: Discovery has never actually had a run on network television... it was exclusive to a streaming service. Star Trek: Discovery was previously locked behind the CBS All Access paywall in its primary market (North America), with no "Free" option, leaving a lot of potential viewers who were interested in the series but were unwilling to shell out for another streaming service for just one show with no way to follow it. This was, for a nontrivial percentage of the show's target audience, a genuine premiere in the sense that it was their first actual opportunity to watch it. CBS has an almost literal captive audience due to various states of lovkdown or quarantine in the US. Folks are staying in and watching more TV, which should have been extremely favorable conditions to launch a broadcast run of a "new" series. It was, in all honesty, the kind of "I told you so" that nobody is happy to deliver. It was obviously a bad idea, but they did it anyway. I'm far from happy about it. Rolling out the most expensive Star Trek series ever produced for a broadcast debut only to have it outperformed by gameshow and crime drama reruns is BAD for the long-term health of the franchise. Investor confidence in Star Trek is already suffering due to Netflix and Amazon's disappointment with their respective Star Trek licenses and the lack of merchandising support for either new series. The more they double down on their mistakes, the harder it'll be to get new Star Trek approved and funded. We've seen some of the damage already, like CBS being unable to secure funding for the Section 31 series, Star Trek: Picard getting a much smaller budget than CBS hoped for from Amazon, and the still-in-limbo Strange New Worlds. I want there to still be a Star Trek franchise after Kurtzman and Chabon's contracts expire in a few years.
  18. I have to wonder, because it kind of fell by the wayside once Seifreit was captured and "rehabilitated" by the Southern Cross Army. IIRC he was just some guy from one of the space stations the Zor attacked. Nobody special.
  19. Whatever, man. I've got not stake in your discontent. The reason I felt the article from Variety might be of interest here was because there's been a fair amount of curiosity in the Star Trek fandom on Facebook and elsewhere about how the show is doing in purely objective terms, given CBS is oddly reluctant to discuss it even with their own shareholders. Nothing gets people talking like an unanswered question, y'know? When there is something to be positive about, you will no doubt see positivity. Until then... well... best of luck? (Incidentally, the word of the week from my calendar is "phlogiston"... not one I'll get a chance to use in conversation unless I talk to someone researching alchemy.)
  20. TBH, if I were going to compare Macross 7 to any Gundam title it'd have to be Mobile Fighter G Gundam. Macross 7 started airing pretty much right as G Gundam was hitting the middle of its story (between Ep26 and 27) and G Gundam ended when Macross 7 was about half done (between Ep23 and 24). Despite G Gundam being more of a super robot series, they had a very similar aesthetic and were very hotblooded and full of boisterous enthusiasm. Lots of grown men shouting about their burning emotions and such. For the record, I've seen most of what Gundam has produced animation-wise except for Gundam AGE, Build Fighters and its spinoffs, and the SD Gundam shows. I've not seen Narrative yet, but it's on my to-do list. Macross 7 has a pretty damned big following in Japan, and tie-ins to it are ALL OVER THE PLACE in Macross. The most blatant perhaps being Macross FB7, an entire OVA devoted to Frontier characters revisiting Macross 7. However, we've had Macross 7 characters feature prominently in SRW games, in Macross's own games (esp. Macross 30), the Macross Frontier prequel Macross the Ride is almost as much a Macross 7 spinoff as Macross Frontier prequel with all of the main characters having some tie to Macross 7, Macross Delta's gaiden manga Macross E ties into Macross Dynamite 7 fairly blatantly, and then of course there's all the different times they've acknowledged Fire Bomber was almost as culturally impactful in-universe as Minmay like in Macross Frontier and Macross Delta. It had its fair share of toys when it was new, to the point that I'm actually pretty surprised we haven't seen Bandai or Arcadia releasing the Fire Valkyrie, Super Thunderbolt, Nightmare, etc. It's actually really weird now that I think about it, given how beloved Macross 7 is in Japan. Macross Plus wasn't nearly as well-received as 7 when they were both coming out, and we've seen a lot more stuff from Plus for some reason. (WRT Gundam toys, I think a lot of those are just plain easier to make because they don't transform or like the Zeta and Double Zeta Gundams they're minimal transformations, so they get made in greater profusion.)
  21. Started Mob Psycho 100 over from the beginning so I could watch it through uninterrupted. The plot's hasn't really hooked me yet, but one scene really has gotten my attention. When they first introduce Mob's love interest, all the other girls have vegetables for heads. That's a visually striking way to make it clear Mob's got eyes for nobody else, and it's animated really REALLY well. Reigen's kind of a manipulative creep. Kinda hoping he becomes less of a creep as the series goes on, or this'll be hard to stomach given how trusting Mob seems to be. It definitely has a very different feel overall from One Punch Man.
  22. Nice. I'll be interested to hear your thoughts on Dirty Pair Flash. That one, IMO, has an undeservedly bad rap. Gundam SEED's one I'd advise against marathoning. It's not bad, but it's kinda got that Macross 7 problem going for it where it can feel a bit samey after a bit of you're watching it all back-to-back. (It is, admittedly, hilarious that SEED Destiny as a series gets gundamjacked halfway through.)
  23. This is slightly disingenuous, isn't it? What I'd posted when you started complaining wasn't bashing the series, it was a recent news piece from a highly credible source and a fact-based analysis that framed the data that news piece provided in a usable context for comparison. It's not really my fault if the objective and entirely impersonal data paints an unflattering picture. To be frank, I don't think I was being unfair or especially unkind when I pointed out that this was the expected result either. People didn't get (back) onto the tack of Discovery being a bad show until after you poked your oar in to complain about "negativity" in response to a factual analysis. Even then, all I said in response to you WRT the series itself was that it was badly written and its negativity about the future was its stumbling block in being accepted by its target audience. It was someone else who went a bit Klingon on you about it being a detriment to Star Trek as a whole. (Though I wouldn't be able to honestly say the poster who said it didn't have a pretty good point under all that anger.) Isn't this a tad hypocritical, given that you keep coming back to these threads to complain about the "negativity" that so offends you... even when you apparently admit it's actually well-founded? Perhaps take your own advice? All that happened here was I posted a very recent news piece relevant to the series and an analysis of its contents. You got triggered and started a fuss fit that got people back to arguing its merits or lack thereof. That, my friend, is on YOU.
  24. Yeah, this has been kind of a disappointing season for me... but I have a good feeling about the next one. Gave Mob Psycho 100 a whirl over dinner... its first episode did not thrill me. I'm going to give it a few more episodes but this definitely isn't drawing me in the way One Punch Man did.
×
×
  • Create New...