azrael

Looks like someone didn't read the book or watch the original 1980-miniseries. 😁 They all end the same way.

5 hours ago, TangledThorns said:

We are not the target audience for this movie ☹️

I'm 100% certain we are not.

3 hours ago, mikeszekely said:

 But it's the kind of Transformers movie my daughter will want to watch in the theater with me.

Yeah. Definitely a take-the-kids-on-a-weekend-afternoon-theater-trip-movie. I'm not saying it's good or bad (I won't know and I'm not golng to see it anyways), but for people with kids, this seems like that ideal movie to bring them to see on a weekend afternoon.

Galvatron: This is bad comedy.

51 minutes ago, MKT said:

Agreed. I guess I was reading too much into that last bit of quoted paragraph, and in hindsight it doesn't really make sense to design a VF to take advantage of the HG shortcut transformation whilst ignoring perfect transformation toys. 

Economics. Perfect transformation kits cost more to make, lowering the production volume, increasing the price consumers pay. HG kits don’t need as much engineering if you can “cheat” the transformation, increasing the production volume, lowering the price consumer pays. Yes, a HG kit is lower quality but consider what the price people will pay when money is tight. A $40 HG kit vs a $300+ DX Chogokin kinda says it. 

11 hours ago, MKT said:

Should we be worried(?) when he says of the HG kits:

In the past, plastic models were also tackled as complete transformations, but I think the decision to abandon them and incorporate replacement transformations was wonderful. As long as it is a plastic model, the element of "wanting to assemble as many aircraft as you want" is an important factor. By doing so, it is possible to distinguish it from DX Chogokin. It was also an opportunity for me to think that if it is possible to increase mobility to this level, I should be able to do it so far for the next aircraft I will work on.

I don't think so. I think he's referring to the fact that transforming kits are inherently fragile. In the model making world, we've know this for a very long time. Every transformation increases the chance parts will break. Kits that are more "static" in their design haven't suffered nearly as many broken joints, part failures, etc. Likewise, transformations can also limit the posing options for kits cuz the transformation mechanism can interfere with the posing options. Removing those "transformations" and using static parts has fixed a lot of broken parts-issues. Hence why I've stayed away from MG Zeta Gundam kits and still have VF-25 kits MIB. Soon as transform it, plastic bits go flying. And I'm being gentle.

1 hour ago, Shawn said:

The side bar says 30 billion yen market? For Macross or all?

I'd wager all merchandising, given the context in the photo.

It would help with comparison to know Gundam merchandising numbers (and how much smaller Macross is compared to Gundam).
Gundam Franchise Earns Record Sales Topping 131 Billion Yen (May 2023) (for context, 131B Yen = ~$900 million in 2023)

Bandai Namco Quarterly Financial statements

@Seto Kaiba is correct. Even in the 1990s-2000s, whatever short-term gains Macross or any other popular anime of the time (Evangelion; for example), they would always be a tiny piece of the pie compared to Gundam. Always.

10 minutes ago, Big s said:

About a month or so ago there was a lot of talk about P+ giving the axe to its animated shows and I guess this was a part of all that. Not sure if they’ll still get episodes of shows from other networks or if it just includes their originals. Not even sure honestly what if any originals they have since I still have yet to meet anyone with P+

Streaming originals are gonna take a hit for the next couple of years until streaming revenue normalizes or goes into the black. I've said in another thread, streaming services are looking to license more shows over the next few years due to all the lost they've incurred over the past few years doing originals. Regarding Star Trek, I've heard Paramount wants to par it down to 1 Star Trek show at a time to bring down expenses. This show, Prodigy S2, Discovery S5, and SNW S3 were all being produced at the same time. Two shows are heavy VFX-users. And 5 seasons seems like a good number to end on anyways. 'Lest ye become stale. *cough* Rick & Morty */cough*

14 hours ago, cheemingwan1234 said:

So, how does  the VF-2SS and VF-2JA from Macross II compare to the canon VFs from Delta?

Keep in mind, we have no specs except for weapon loadouts (and bare minimum at that) and maybe, dimensions on the Macross II VFs. 0. Nada. Zilch. We can't really compare because there is literally nothing to compare to on paper.

4 hours ago, kajnrig said:

Huh. I guess this means Sandman season 2 has been confirmed? Maybe I just don't remember...

Still, a bit odd that the spinoff would premiere before those characters are introduced in the main show. Or maybe not, I can see how they'd make it work.

Season 2 is currently filming (was paused due to the strikes). We do have some episode titles so this should tell you which comics are being adapted

Old Thread:

This thread is for non-Macross "just purchased" toys.

Just Purchased Macross Toys thread here:

==========================================

New rules for this thread for the New Year of 2025.   

1). Maximum uploads of 3 pictures of a toy even if you bought two.   That means if you bought DC Batman you can post a combination of boxed and opened pics of up to three here.  Anymore than three will get the post deleted.   If you bought another copy of the same DC Batman toy that does not constitute as a different toy and does not earn you three new photos.  The moderation team considers that spamming and will be deleted.  Text link to an external photo gallery if you have more than three pictures to share.

2). Image size:  Height maximum per toy will now be set to 2400pixels for 3 pictures combined.   That means one high resolution picture at 2400pixels or three decent resolution picture of 800pixels each.

Choose your picture(s), less is more.

Old thread, retired.

This thread is for MACROSS-toys ONLY.

New rules for this thread for the New Year of 2025.   

1). Maximum uploads of 3 pictures of a toy even if you bought two.   That means if you bought DC Batman you can post a combination of boxed and opened pics of up to three here.  Anymore than three will get the post deleted.   If you bought another copy of the same DC Batman toy that does not constitute as a different toy and does not earn you three new photos.  The moderation team considers that spamming and will be deleted.  Text link to an external photo gallery if you have more than three pictures to share.

2). Image size:  Height maximum per toy will now be set to 2400pixels for 3 pictures combined.   That means one high resolution picture at 2400pixels or three decent resolution picture of 800pixels each.

Choose your picture(s), less is more.

2 hours ago, twich said:

God, I hope that cancellation does not occur! I’m really looking forward to all releases!

It should not affect physical releases. Disappearing from the streaming platform after a set amount of time...that's another story.

They Have Risen: ‘Godzilla x Kong’ Conquers Easter Box Office With $80M Opening; Legendary Monsterverse Franchise Crosses $2 Billion – Sunday AM Box Office (Deadline.com)

🤷‍♂️

9 hours ago, jenius said:

I don't understand what's not to like about the trailer. It's just a teaser, has a lot of action, has some good actors in it. That's why I would guess it's just review bombing.

It is a trailer. A cherry-picked glimpse of what's to come. Hence why I'm moving into the "wait-&-see" column.

7 minutes ago, Seto Kaiba said:

The Acolyte being 100 years ahead of The Phantom Menace seems to be their idea of a happy medium for now... far enough away that the events of the Skywalker Saga aren't yet relevant to the story, but close enough that they don't have to tweak the visual aesthetic any.

How about 200? 400? 500? Stop using such small numbers.

25 minutes ago, Dynaman said:

And vice versa.

So if it's neither and both, it will be, as the kids would say these days, mid.

3 hours ago, Seto Kaiba said:

They do... but, based on statements at the last few quarterly earnings calls, Disney's seniors execs and board of directors have cooled on the idea of acquiring outside companies for their IP and audiences.  They've spent a combined $88.705 billion on acquisitions since 2006 just between Pixar ($7.5B), LucasFilm ($5.905B), Marvel ($4B), and Fox ($71.3B).  That doesn't include the organizational debt they acquired in the process too, which puts the total cost over $100 billion.  They're still paying that down, and they'll be doing so for years to come... with even major brands like Star Wars or Marvel only starting to break even ~7 years after being acquired.

Like I said, expect more streaming licensing from studios to bolster their catalogs. All these mergers from the past few years have hurt the bottom line and they need to recoup the costs (also, corporate debt isn't the same as average consumer debt).

2 hours ago, Duymon said:

What in the world is going on lol 

Maybe review bombing? Maybe not. Who knows. Could be the court of public opinion. 🤷‍♂️ Could be, like me, many folks are not warming up to this show as it has been presented. 🤷‍♂️ More data is required.

1 hour ago, kajnrig said:

Who even is Doomcock and why is his opinion noteworthy?

A talking-head Youtuber. Noteworthy opinion? That depends on you. Like all talking heads, they've all got an opinion.

56 minutes ago, Roy Focker said:

As a streaming service, they need fresh content that doesn't cost much to acquire.

45 minutes ago, Seto Kaiba said:

  Their efforts to merge with Hulu and diversify their streaming portfolio are all about trying to steer a streaming service to profitability like what Netflix had before the bubble burst and the marget segmented.

This lines up with the rumblings I've hard since the end of last year. Streaming services are looking at licensing shows to fill their catalogs as in-house content has been such a money drain for the past couple of years that they want to scale back in-house produced content to licensing content, which is cheaper. Look at Doctor Who on D+. BBC is producing the show but the Mouse bought the streaming rights for the show. I've heard similar things from WB-D looking to boost their own anime catalog by obtaining streaming rights of some upcoming shows. They're still making their own shows, but until profitability comes up, those in-house productions will be fewer and farther apart while licensed shows will be on the uptick. Netflix has been upping the number of K-dramas on the service. What's the other genre which has yet to see wider audience? Anime.

Maybe it’s me, but as more time passes since the trailer’s debut, I’m drifting into “wait & see”-territory with this show. Maybe it’s Lucasfilm’s current track record. But as of now, I’m not sold on this show.

Given the tendency of disappearing media off streaming media network lately, perhaps the public will realize having physical media is not as bad as it seems? 😒

1 hour ago, seti88 said:

YOU GOT TO BE KIDDING...6HRS of gaming at that age??

Yup. Watch his BF2042 sniping clips. That grandpa really understand the bullet drop mechanics in that game.

25 minutes ago, Duke Togo said:

  Hide contents

You don't think it's too early for that? I was thinking season 3.

Possibly. Depends how they play out all the battles this season.

1 hour ago, Duke Togo said:

Yeah, I chose not to post the Green trailer. Up with the Blacks, down with the Greens.

House of the Dragon's channel combined the Green and Black trailers. HBO Max's channel split the trailer into "Green"and the "Black" trailers.

No one said this Dark Side-user was, specifically, a Sith.