Graham

No more bitchin' and moaning from me from now on about this product. What we are seeing is what we are getting. I've accepted that and I'm slowly growing to like it (but not love it yet). Looking forward to getting it and doing a review. Graham

As well as the specs you have translated above, do any of the other paragraphs provide any new insight? Graham

Was considering getting the big AT TE, but I've been reading online about how the legs fall off too easily. Anyboday have it and have this problem. Graham

Never heard anything about the first release of the game coming with any extras. Graham

Don't think they are hinges, just separate pressed in parts. Perhaps they cover screws? Graham

Don't think they are hinges, just separate pressed in parts. Graham

I fit all 10 issues in one binder, including the ad pages no problem. Graham

Maybe it's your monitor? Looks, super dazzling minty white to me. Graham

Yeah, I also don't buy that the DX was based in anyway on that non-final concept design sketch. Wasn't it already stated by the design team that they toy was designed this way to appeal to traditional 1/55 Chunky and chogokin fans and also so it would be more rugged and durable. Graham

Looking good in the latest pics. I like how they got the grey correct inside the mouth of the VF-25F. Graham

Yeah, the head lasers are pretty loose. Not 'fall off by themself' lose, but ceratinly 'fall off at a slight touch' loose. Graham

There's a nice close up of the pilots, but yeah basically, nothing really new is shown. Graham

Despite the various inaccuracies, I find myself looking forward more and more to the release of these toys. Graham

Finished my VF-25S Ozma at the weekend. I didn't bother with panel lining this time, just did a quick build and stickered it up. Where as the Alto VF-25F definitely needs panel lining to look good, IMO the grey plastic of the VF-25S actually looks fine without any panel lining. Bandai have obviously made some improvements to the tooling as the wing-roop/hip guns fit much better on this kit. Unfortunately, while building it, I broke the hook connector on the neck bar that connects to the collar. I couldn't fix it again. Beacuse of this I decided after completing the kit to glue it permanently into fighter mode. Luckily I found the peices that my wife had lost, so I can now build my second kit, which I will leave transformable (assuming I don't break anything). As others have already mentioned, the tips of the horns on the big skull sticker, actually sit on top of the wing hinges, which is likely going to damage the sticker during transformation. Graham

I have an unused water slide decal sheet for both VF-25F and VF-25S. Graham

Sigh......VF-1. Aghhhhhhh! Graham

Again..........why? The original was perfect, i'll stick with that thank you very much. No live action pretenders for me. Graham

Many years ago, I saw a Bandai 1/55 VT-1 out of the box in a shop in HK. The owner had it displayed on a shelf quite near to some florescent lights. All the white parts had turned brown! Actually, I've had bad luck with Bandai white plastics. I had three of the perfect transformation V Gundam toys that were released a few years ago, mint in unopened boxes. I stored them under my bed away from any UV light, but when I checked them earlier this year, the white plastic parts had seriously discolored. Graham

The ver.1 1/60 VF-1 do seem quite prone to yellowing. None of my 1/48 including first issue VF-1A Hikaru have started to yellow. Graham

If it's Mikimoto Minmay porn, I'm in. Graham

I would think that Plus/7 era G-Suits are likely somewhat superior in performance to modern day G-suits, especially, the YF-21/VF-22 G-suit, which seems specific to the YF-21/VF-22. However, it's extremely doubtful IMO that they come close to the performance of Ex-Gear combined with ICS. Just my two cents. Graham

Agreed, the VF-25 may not be superior in every aspect to the VF-19 or VF-22, but it is likely superior in enough areas to make it overall a better VF than the older mecha. Graham

Heh, I was orginally going to mention the F-35 Joint Strife Fighter as one of the possible exceptions to the rule that newer is not always better, but decided against it. But, as David has opened that can of worms. Heh, I'll take a Typhoon/Raphael or Gripen against your F-35 in A2A anyday, or an A-10 for the CAS role rather than the F-35. Graham

With fighter jets it's usually the case that newer does in fact mean better, especially when there is a significant time gap between the new and the old. In the case of the YF-19 and YF-21, development began in 2034 and the first test flight for both took place in 2039. The VF-25 had it's first test flight in 2057, 18 years after the first flight of the YF-19 & YF-21. It's unlikely IMO that that a VF with the advantage of 18 years improvements in technology would actually be worse than the older VFs. Graham

Why even bother with developing new systems such as Ex-Gear and ISC if G-suits already exist that can handle extremely high G limits such as +60/-45 of the VF-22. It just doesn't make sense to me and as others have said doesn't seem consistant with in-universe technological development. I'm wondering if the stated maximam G limits are in fact more to do with the max speed at which a VF can safely transform without ripping itself apart? Graham