Jump to content

Cat's Eye Questions


Coota0

Recommended Posts

1) Is tha Cat's Eye supposed to be a Recon Platform or Command and Control like an E-2/E-3 or both?

2) Are the two people in the cockpit the only crewmebers? Are there more in the fuselage? Anybody got an opinion on if there could be?

I only ask because we've seen that occasionly there are descepencies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So does that mean there's a larger crew of Controllers in the Fuselauge like an E-2 or what?

That's the impression I get. I think there must be a couple guys in the back.

As for what happens in the series, I can't comment on it, because I haven't seen enough of it. A large amount of what I know about the two is due to a thread I started asking about the same thing about a year ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm...then why did they send a Cat's Eye out on a recon mission?

AWACS is your eye in the sky

remember that the SDF-1's radar was damaged by the attack

it needed a forward radar recon to find out where the enemy was

it was never intended for the CatsEye to encounter a threat visually

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was always under the impression that both the Cat's Eye and the Elintseeker did the same thing: monitor enemy positions, communications and patterns. I was also under the impression that they were in effect the "head of the spear", meaning all the information they gather is routed back to the SDF-1 for specialists to decipher and analyze... sort of like a spy plane in effect. The episode Bye Bye Mars seems to support that thinking in that whatever the Cat's Eye scans gets filtered to the bridge in real time. But conversely in DYRL the rear seater of the Elintseeker seems to have unique viewing of the data they intercept and calls the position of the Zentradi ship out to the bridge more like a FAC (forward air controller) radioing in positions for the following ships to take out.

Seems that those two units act like several real world recon and survalence planes... I guess the VF-1 series is just so darn versitle that they can do that. :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nightbat, I'm not asking why a recon mission was needed, but why a Cat's Eye was selected for the mission if it isn't a recon craft. It may be that I'm misunderstanding the difference between AWACS and recon, or it could be that the roles themselves are somewhat modified or blurred in the UN Spacy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nightbat, I'm not asking why a recon mission was needed, but why a Cat's Eye was selected for the mission if it isn't a recon craft. It may be that I'm misunderstanding the difference between AWACS and recon, or it could be that the roles themselves are somewhat modified or blurred in the UN Spacy.

The Cat's Eye detection suite should be far more powerful than a Valk - that's why it was sent out. Remember, there is no Elint in the series, so there wasn't anything else that could handle the mission profile. They weren't attacking anybody, they were just out for a look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nightbat, I'm not asking why a recon mission was needed, but why a Cat's Eye was selected for the mission if it isn't a recon craft. It may be that I'm misunderstanding the difference between AWACS and recon, or it could be that the roles themselves are somewhat modified or blurred in the UN Spacy.

The Cat's Eye detection suite should be far more powerful than a Valk - that's why it was sent out. Remember, there is no Elint in the series, so there wasn't anything else that could handle the mission profile. They weren't attacking anybody, they were just out for a look.

The Macross lost their radar, they needed the powerful radar of the Catseye

AWACS is a form of reconnisance, only compared to a normal recon it has no strike capability

dumb thing they did was not give it an escort

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. I think you're right that there's nobody in the body. I don't have a particularly good reason, other than they never mention the other people or try to rescue them in Blind Game. (Maybe they weren't put on board for that mission?)

2. Thanks for the clarifications on AWACS.

3. Again, though, why not use a "Funny Chinese" on the mission? That's the real Elint predecessor, IMO.

vefr-1-battroid.jpgvefr-1-fighter.jpg

4. If the Cat's Eye is more like an AWACS, then maybe the reason it was sent out with Misa was to function not merely as a recon but as a way for Misa to take over some of the functions of the bridge flight operations. I don't think the dialog/action supports this, though.

5. The Cat's Eye did have escort: Vermilion Team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3. Again, though, why not use a "Funny Chinese" on the mission? That's the real Elint predecessor, IMO.

Who can say the capabilities of the funny chinese compared to the Cats Eye? From a guy who knows nothing about it, I would say that looking at just the dome size indicates that the Cats Eye has greater range. I think that the Chinese is used locally in hot spots, while the Cats Eye is used to control regions.

And, we needed a way for Misa to get on the cruiser so Hikaru could kiss her ;) the Chinese might have been harder to script into getting captured.

Besides , how often did you see the chinese in the show anyway?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the dish is so close to the VF's body that I wonder if it's actually working at all...

The aim of the dish is to recieve echos. If the body is between echos and the dish, it won't work.

The real awacs have a dish that is not glued on the body of the plane. Also, awacs are flying high and they detect planes and enemies below. So, in space, what's "below" and "above" when you fly every where.

It should use a sphere radar instead to look in all directions. i am not specialist I might be wrong but if you look at the planes noce radars, they have a 3D angle, and, it correspond to the front of the plane, not their back angle...

Can some one confirm?

Edited by Göönk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't believe there is any crew member inside the plan's body. If so, Misa would have been inside the cat's eye instead of being in the cockpit. My opinion.

I thoaught perhaps as a senior officer she chose the the front seat.

I would speculate that it's because the rear positions were all devoted to specific roles, and all were manned by their specific officers, leaving only the co-pilot's seat for Misa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

considering the size of the model there would be a lot of space in the rear...this could be filled with computers or other things...but comparing it to current day AWACs and similar role craft it would seem to make sense that there would be 1-3 crew members to monitor all the scans and direct them. Remember...the pilot is flying, so unless it is all automated someone needs to decided how to focus the scans, and what type of scans are being done. Additionally, someone might be there as a communications officer.

For comparison the current E-3 AWACS has a crew:

"Flight crew of four plus mission crew of 13-19 specialists (mission crew size varies according to mission) "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

considering the size of the model there would be a lot of space in the rear...this could be filled with computers or other things...but comparing it to current day AWACs and similar role craft it would seem to make sense that there would be 1-3 crew members to monitor all the scans and direct them. Remember...the pilot is flying, so unless it is all automated someone needs to decided how to focus the scans, and what type of scans are being done. Additionally, someone might be there as a communications officer.

For comparison the current E-3 AWACS has a crew:

"Flight crew of four plus mission crew of 13-19 specialists (mission crew size varies according to mission) "

AN E-2,which does the same thing has a crew 3-4 in the back of the plane, that doesn't count the flight crew

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Catseye may have more automation than current generation AWACS aircraft hence the smaller crew. Also it can just relay the information gathered to the controllers in Macross so no need to risk more personnel.

But, what if you lose your data link to the ship, or your communictions from the ship to the fighters is being jammed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it is entirely possible that the creators of the show simpley created the aircraft to fufill the need of the plot with out putting much serious thought into the military advantage of the vehicle itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But, what if you lose your data link to the ship, or your communictions from the ship to the fighters is being jammed?

Maybe they have several frequencies to transmit with. If communication with ships to fighters can be jammed than while have the Catseye in the first place if as the comms between the AWACS and fighters can be jammed too. Of course nothing is ever easy in a war.

The RL carriers normally switch off their own radar and deploy E-2C aircraft so the carrier's position stays hidden but something the size of macross can be a bit harder to hide.

Then again Macross has always been less about the military.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it is entirely possible that the creators of the show simpley created the aircraft to fufill the need of the plot with out putting much serious thought into the military advantage of the vehicle itself.

No! Say it's not true! Say it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...but something the size of macross can be a bit harder to hide.

compaired to space, nothing is very big.

Thats an excellent quote!!!

:)

I was looking at the model Tanmen did, and it looks like there are doors and spaces in the back...I think the earlier E2 comparison is perfect...at least a few crew members would make sense to insure backup systems and proper direction takes place....after all, if it was all automated why even send pilots, why not just send a drone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...