Jump to content

tetsujin

Members
  • Posts

    343
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by tetsujin

  1. I love love love this kit line! Well, actually this kit line does have some problems... Basically I started collecting them in 2004 because they were being reissued, because they were in-scale with my Destroid Monster, and because I like small kits... These kits mostly seem like scaled-down counterparts of the 1:100 scale ARII and IMAI kits, as far as I can tell... Those kits had some problems to begin with, and the Nichimo versions add simplified detailing (hands, head) and screw-holes to the mix... I think the Destroids and Zentradi machines are the best out of the line... And the Super Battroids are pretty good, but the gerwalks aren't so hot IMO... But, yeah, I built two of these things and did extensive work on a third. (Haven't finished it yet) I only have photos of my Regult on-line... Regult Before and After... ...With artifact of Protoculture... I also built a Super Battroid VF-1J... With both models I had some decals printed so I wouldn't be using the crappy stickers that come with the re-issues... Back when the "Cyber Model Comp" was still on-line, there was a nice buildup of the Nichimo Armored Battroid - the modeler opened all the missile hatches and mounted missiles inside. Good stuff...
  2. Hey everybody, This month at Mecha Model Comp is our Macross Valkyries contest. Entries can be any VF from any Macross show, or any diorama with a VF as a central figure. Entries will be accepted until the end of the month, at which point judging will start. I'd like to encourage people to enter, or at least check it out. Thanks!
  3. I can understand how it'd happen, though. It is perilously tempting to think of one's own car, when locked, as being secure. It's not. I've had two car-breakins (though, thankfully, none since) in which I lost the CD players and a palm pilot (Handera 330 - flaky as hell but it was a fun model...) and two backpacks full of expensive Japanese textbooks. In the first they just smashed the window (comprehensive glass coverage: Yay! Difficulty in finding a non-smoked rear door window for a Jeep Cherokee: Boo....) and in the second they jammed something in my doorlock and twisted. Did I learn after the first time? Apparently not. But apart from that, one's car is very personal space, and 99.9% (in my neighborhood anyway) of the time it's perfectly safe to leave things in the car for a bit. So, like I said, it's tempting to think that stuff's safe. But windows break, locks break, and I don't think anybody takes alarms seriously, either. cyde01: I sympathize with your loss. It's not just the cost of the things or the fact that in this case it's hard to replace them even with money. They were yours and I know how it can feel when somebody violates that.
  4. If you're referring to my post, please think of it in purely mechanical terms. What I have to say, it's not good, it's not bad, it is what it is. I'm talking shop, it's something I enjoy about this hobby. If grayson or Cap don't want to deal with me on that level that's their business. If what I have to say is something that's abundantly obvious already - well, then maybe "duh" is the right response to it. But maybe you can leave the decision to be offended or not up to the people who have a real stake in this? John's not making a kit for me - not as far as I know, anyway. I think it's a terrific project and it's great that he's selling cast copies for people who can't or won't scratchbuild things themselves - I presently have to cut my spending and so won't be buying one. So to me, this is more like someone's model project, rather than a new kit release. I assumed there'd been plenty of positive feedback already and that I could proceed straight to the meat of what I had to say without a redundant (and somewhat dishonest, in the sense that it was a statement I'd be immediately contradicting by questioning his design decisions) "it looks terrific/thank you so much for making this/I want to buy one for sure, but..." Though, to be fair, I've been on the other side of this sort of thing before (somewhat) - been told in response after response after response that part of my design interpretation was wrong, or "If I were doing it, I'd make such-and-such decision"... when I'd already spent a lot of time coming to the conclusion that I did and verifying it to my own satisfaction... It's hard to not get a little irritated by things like that. Makes you want to say "Go build your own, then." I'd like to be able to make criticisms like that without offending modelers, and as a modeler I hope to be able to accept criticisms like that without taking them personally as I often do. v Cap, glad to hear the project's been personally rewarding. A while back I started to feel that I was spending too much time on projects that weren't quite at the core of what I wanted to do, and so had to swear off such things and re-focus on the bits of the hobby that were really compelling to me. So for me, too, it's very important to be personally satisfied with my projects.
  5. Those orthos aren't going to be perfect, either (and, frankly, comparing to that front view it still looks like your model's head, and the hump on the back, are both too large) - you have to balance the priorities here: do you take one piece of reference as gospel or do you attempt to compose something based on your own observations of the shape described in the art? I think with anime art it's necessary to compromise between the two. Used alone, the former approach reproduces the flaws in the art while the latter strays too far from the source. I also think when you're faced with conflicting references it's best to choose the reference that looks best and turn it into a working 3-D design, rather than take a version that's already a working 3-D design without concern for whether it looks good... Also, why did you sculpt in the cannon stripes? I know they did this on various model kits, but from the lineart the stripes look painted on... (Or is that detail shown in relief in a "high detail" version of the lineart?)
  6. 2004. The re-issued a bunch of stuff from Macross, Macross II, and Mac 7, including the 1:100 Destroids and Zentradi machines (apart from the Regult, anyway).
  7. 1) I would love to - but I absolutely suck at meeting deadlines for such things, so probably not. 2) See #1. 3) Probably not - but if you did I think my suggestion for a theme would be the "Flying Circus" - models and dioramas exemplifying the dynamic action choreography of Macross. So missile swarms (and even better, the evasion of missile swarms) would be worth bonus points. 4) I don't understand the question. I think there should be designated judges responsible for judging, though. Popular vote is too easily swayed. 5) I'd be just as happy competing for bragging rights. 6) Mach 3, but slower in gerwalk mode.
  8. You should also check Yahoo! Japan auctions. Old Macross kits (and many other old anime kits) turn up there much more frequently than they do on E-Bay. You can order kits from Yahoo! Japan sellers using a proxy-bidding service like Celga. I got a couple Imai Monsters this way, probably paid around $100 for both after all (incl. proxy fees, shipping, etc.) was accounted.
  9. Interesting... I had no idea there was a new DVD release of Votoms coming. Soft subs and improved video? Sounds pretty good... (Of course, I already picked up the whole series a while back, the bargains available on the old DVDs were pretty good - though still not as good as $100 for the whole series...) It's really a great show. Chirico is the f'n man.
  10. Yeah, but you can't just "drop" them, you have to "de-orbit" them - apply enough force to them to make them fall out of orbit, and quickly. For the amount of energy needed to de-orbit something massive enough to survive atmospheric entry and do some significant damage after the ground-based defensive weapons have taken a crack at it, I feel like the amount of energy going into this attack (especially if the rocks aren't readily on-hand, if they need to be imported from an asteroid belt or something) could be better spent elsewhere, unless the particular circumstances of the battle are such that you really need a lot of cheap, disposable ballistic mass. Plus bombardment can only accomplish so much. At some point you need to get your hands dirty. Here's my take on the situation. IANAMC ("I am not a military commander" for those not familiar with this every-day shorthand... ) First I assume there's a compelling reason to take the planet and/or a large portion of its population alive rather than blasting them to space dust. I'm also going to assume the attackers don't have an overwhelming advantage in technology or numbers - because what fun is that? If my troops have godlike powers we'll just invade however we like. Troop drops (Starship Troopers/Gundam Seed style) have the advantage that the enemy isn't presented with large targets, but rather a multitude of small targets and comparable decoys. This is great for establishing an invasion on the ground or for harrassment attacks as depicted in ST. Once some territory is secured, I would want to reinforce the ground forces by sending down larger drop-ships carrying more troops and heavier units (large land/air/naval battleships, etc.), and establish a base of sorts. A drop-capable cap ship could serve in that capacity, though I expect there would be better ways of doing it. (Normally a space ship would be specialized for space, not generalized for all environments. An all-environment ship could get the job done, and be good when the base needs to be established quickly - but I expect a better option would be to send down materials to set up a field station - something that would be semi-permanent and likely abandoned if need be.) Space superiority is important, but like air superiority it alone can't get the job done. I would think an orbital bombardment happening concurrently with the land invasion would be best - if the bombardment happens first and goes on for too long then the defenders have time to rally their defense and harden their position, making the ground invasion tougher. Rather I'd want the initial bombardment to cause chaos, which the drop troops could take advantage of. So the bombardment happens just as the troops are being sent into the atmosphere, and the troops arrive to promptly mop-up the military forces not already blasted into atoms. The initial invasion would likely have to be concentrated on one defensible area - a small continent or two, perhaps. (I'm assuming my invasion force isn't large enough to immediately conquer the whole planet.) This has the disadvantage that the defending forces on the rest of the planet will have an opportunity to rally for their defense and counter-attack, but it makes it much easier for my forces to become established on the planet's surface. The space forces would likely hold mostly to a stationary orbit over that area, while ground and space forces establish defenses against long-range missile attacks which could threaten the fleet. The fleet's space superiority would be used as an offensive tool to expand the ground forces' territory, and the ground forces' territory would be used to establish defensive measures to protect themselves and the space fleet.
  11. Hey, can I ask you something? I'm curious about the kind of planning you did for the build. Did you lay out the whole thing in orthographic plans before building or did you start with another model kit and scale/tweak measurements to fit the scale and your taste, or what? If you made plans, would you be willing to share them? I'm working on a set of plans for my first scratchbuild now... It's tough going but it's interesting stuff.
  12. Have you tried Yahoo! Japan auctions? I can't find the items there right now but I'd say it's probably your best bet, unless you can find an import shop or something that has some kicking around. (I had given up hope of finding an EX Redtail until I found one at Gundam Store & More - likewise there was a point in time where I was trying to find the Gasaraki Raiden and a bunch of them turned up at Gundamshop. It's unusual, but there are times when the kit you want will just turn up, if you do the right digging...) As for reissues - I imagine Bandai will reissue all the 1:35 Patlabor stuff at some point, simply because they have the molds. But they'll make us wait years, I'm sure, since Patlabor, while popular, isn't so hot a property that they can just keep the stuff in constant circulation...
  13. Terminator's continuity isn't that solid to begin with. John Conner is born because of a predestination paradox. Kyle Reese goes back in time to stop the terminator from killing Sarah Conner, mother of John Conner. In the process, they have sex and he winds up being John conner's father. Meaning that the rebel leader Skynet attempted to prevent was only created BECAUSE the terminator was running around in the past. A predestination paradox requires a rigid and unchangable timeline, at least with regards to the events responsible for the paradox. There is also the perspective to time travel which says that if you change something, the timeline forks, but without destroying the alternate timeline. So we have: Timeline 1: Sarah gets pregnant from some other guy, John is born, apocalypse happens, John is the great leader and the terminator and Kyle are sent back in time. (But in this timeline, neither Kyle nor the Terminator appear in the past.) Timeline 2: Kyle and the terminator appear in 1980-something. "Terminator 1" happens. The future John of this timeline is different from the John who Kyle remembers - but based on things said in T2 this John's history must have been similar, at least including sending Kyle back. Timeline 3: "Terminator 2" - John (son of Kyle) sends back Schwarzenegger to fight Robert Patrick. The result is that the apocalypse doesn't happen. In each case, the people who come from the future change the past - but not their own past, rather they create a new past, sort of like an alternate reality in the "Sliders" vein. The world they came from could still exist, but its connection with the altered world is broken. From this perspective, sending anybody back at all seems a waste of time, in the sense that it won't change one's own world - but there's no way anybody involved would know that unless someone actually succeeded in returning to their own future. (I always liked how "Bill & Ted" and "Back to the Future" played with the notion of time travel paradoxes, though...)
  14. Yeah, they got rather imaginative when they came up with the romanized spellings for the Zentradi words.
  15. Hey, it's cool. As far as I'm concerned pictures of unpainted, OOB kits are fair game for reference purposes. I just saw it and it was like, "Hey, I recognize that!" It's just kind of funny, 'cause it's a photo I did a couple years ago now, but it still turns up every so often. BTW, you said that half the pod would be clear-cast: would it be possible to get a pod where both halves are cast normally? If I buy one, I'd rather paint the exterior than have the X-ray, and I'd rather not have to deal with two different types of material in the two pod halves.
  16. Hey, that's my Regult! Great to finally see built-up pics of your Regult... It looks great! (EDIT): Do you have a Hasegawa Battroid for comparison? I could maybe do a ruler-standup shot of my Regult for further reference...
  17. I will be there again this year, and I'll be running the Mecha Modeling Workshop there again, too! I look forward to seeing the Macross panel...
  18. In principle most any mod chip should work. There are also easier-to-install options like flip tops and such. Personally I wanted day-to-day convenience so I put down the money and effort for a mod-chip. In my case, the DMS4. Before you buy a mod chip you should find out which version of the PS2 you have. (If it's the old-style PS2, that is. The slim PS2's are version 12) You can get some of that information from its model number, counting screws on the case, etc. If you have a v12, I'm not sure what the state of modchips with that version is... Last I heard, there were issues.
  19. There were three Robotech panels and not one Macross panel. That's just sad. (But not nearly as sad as my Macross panel last year...) Not Macross-related, but I ran the Mecha Modeling Workshop on Saturday and it was a great success! Thirty-two people, the biggest turnout ever for the event. It was very hectic, especially since AB staff dropped the ball and didn't have my projector there, meaning there were no visual aids for the instructions.
  20. Thanks. Yeah, I use the legos for mold boxes. And I went through a lot of RTV on this project... The Doro Doro in the background, though, that stuff is the real star of this show.
  21. Wing Zero, I'm almost at the point where I can finally prime it and maybe start painting. I scratchbuilt the feathers and the V-fin.
  22. Hey, I'm going again this year, and as with last year I'll be running the Mecha Modeling Workshop, so if anybody wants to learn a bit about building and painting models, come to the workshop and build something! It's scheduled on Saturday from 4-9. Usually it's done with Gundam kits, but I'm thinking of bringing some Nichimo Macross kits this time to mix it up a bit. It's $15 to participate in the workshop, that pays for your model kit, and various tools and supplies you can take home with you (brushes, paints, etc.) You can see more information on past workshops here: Mecha Modeling Workshop page (Incidentally, for those who were there last year, I ran the Macross panel... it was a real disgrace. I should have called it off as soon as it was clear I couldn't spend the time on it that it deserved. Most of my preparation time last year went into the workshop. All the other panels and such that I did were just disastrous. I won't make that mistake again!)
  23. You must not have seen many movies. I honestly don't see how the OT got put on a pedestal like it has been because it really is the same old crap. But everyone knows how I feel about that. The original trilogy is definitely overrated (considering the near-godlike status it has achieved in terms of movie fandom), but at the end of the day they're enjoyable movies. The prequels are just so stilted, and so full of pointless appearances by characters from the old movies that I really can't say the same. What does the young Obi-Wan Kenobi have to do with the old one? Who cares where Boba Fett came from, or the exact details of how the emperor came to power? Star Wars geeks might, for the sake of trivia. The prequels are all about filling in blanks from the original trilogy - blanks which, often as not, just aren't worth filling. At best it makes for good fodder for the trilogy addicts, at worst it's providing a backstory context which has no value. But, yeah, there are worse movies out there than the prequels. The prequels have very little going for them apart from the action - poor performances, lame dialogue, annoying characters, etc... but the action is reasonably good. There have been plenty of movies with all of the above, only not as good.
  24. Well, they sorta acknowledge this at the end where Misa admits that it was simply a "pop song" about love. Nobody ever claimed that they had discovered a masterpiece by the Protoculture's Mozart. Also, if you had never heard any music before. . . and had no concept of any culture, I would think that any music would be shocking. Possibly even Ashly Simpson. Actually I think this ties in nicely with my perspective on the whole "Minmay effect". (And I'm not claiming this is especially insightful, I mean it's right there...) Basically, the reason she's so effective against the Zentradi is specifically because she's a pop star, a sexy young girl (in this case, playing to a crowd of violent adult male virgins) who performs accessible material according to a tried and proven formula. It's not so much about the power of culture over those without it as it is about the power of a very potent form of culture, engineered by years of experimentation - a popular product that's been very well advertised and tailor-fitted to what's been proven to be popular. I don't think that's really a theme in the anime but it's a way of describing what happened in the anime that makes a lot of sense to me. So someone like Britney Spears would be a good analogy IMO, except Spears is less of the Japanese cute/lolicon appeal.
  25. Yeah, so if I spend 200 hours building a Regult, do you suppose I'll have it done before Yamato makes one?
×
×
  • Create New...