I love people like you. Many times before it has been said that technology (specifically long range missiles in one case) would lead to the end of the fighter, but they're still here.
I think UAVs/UCAVs will support manned aircraft. Dale Brown's take is one of my fovorites, his EB-52s use UCAVs for recon and escort and are controlled from the bomber, he also talks about using F-15Es for the same job with the WSO doing the flying. In the realworld UAVs can already download real time imagery to our aircraft and one day will be contolled by the pilots of the aircraft they're scouting for.
You'll never see unmmaned aircraft in the utility, cargo missions, or civilian airline industry, nobody is going to turn their trust over to a computer completley. The aircraft may be largly computer controlled, but not fully...example the UH-60M and CH-47F can both be flown pretty much by computer, you load up a memory stick with a flight profile, plug it into the aircraft and the bird can take off, fly the waypoints, dodge trees and hills and wires, and then land at the designated point, but the pilots are still monitoring the aircraft the hole time. It's great for offloading pilot workload on long flights but you still need the pilots in case there is a problem with the system or somebody starts shooting at you.
The best networks can be hacked and the most secure signals can be jammed you'll always need a man in the air with any system you send up. Pilots working with UAVs/UCAVs as wingmen, direct recon, support, or supplement to their misison...absolutley, it will happen and already does, but you'll always need pilots. Hell, maybe I'm biased because I am one, but that's my two cents.