Jump to content

Shadow

Members
  • Posts

    949
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Shadow

  1. I'm not sure about boomer subs but the Seawolf attack sub is a good comparison. I think the F-22s cost might not be so high if we had actually opened it up for export to key allies. I think the IAF or ROKAF would do alot to get just a few of these in their inventories. The F-22 was designed for a role that has shrunk a great deal in last 20 years. I don't think that means the aircraft doesn't have a future nor does it mean that potential adversaries will always be small, dispersed and low-tech. The Raptor may have to adapt to a role it wasn't originally intended for and we've already seen in tests. There is a certain added punch when you can drop a bomb at over Mach 1.

    That said, given countries like China developing their own 5th gen aircraft, I think the Raptor will still have an important role to play as an air superiority fighter in the future that contemporary aircraft like the F-15C just will not be able to fulfill.

  2. So that's, what, four Raptors lost with no operational kills? Seems like it is worth the cost.

    Staying as unpolitical as possible. We don't know what caused it to go down, however, I think if more money were allocated to actually resolving the problem, we probably wouldn't be seeing this. I recall the F-111 was plagued with issues early in its career. Same with the F-14.

  3. It's great to see Chris Roberts back at it again and trying to breath new life into the PC space flight sim. I liked the tribute that was paid at the beginning of the trailer. Really great of them to do that for Paul Steed and Wing Commander fans. Personally, I would love to see WC 1 and 2 redone with this engine. I'd be interested to see Mark Hamill or Malcolm McDowell reprise their character roles, even if it's just voices in a possible remake. Alot of great things have been done with the Freespace 2 engine but it's time to see something new imho. It's basically my gripe with the LOMAC/DCS flight sims.

    The project is a long ways away from reality though. :(

    This video seems to answer alot of questions. Just skip to 5:11.

  4. The F-15 cockpit looks great. One of big complaints with LOMAC is the stock aircraft models which really haven't changed since 2003. The Su-25T being the exception. Looking forward to IRIS finishing the F-15E model.

    Sometime I'll try BMS. My only Falcon experience was with Falcon 3.0 looong ago.

  5. Your video reminded me again of how much I should get a Track IR. I'm a LOMAC player and have never had the chance to try out BMS. It's a shame that the combat flight sim has been on the endangered species list for quite sometime. Hoping what DCS is doing in allowing Third-party companies to develop aircraft for its games gives the franchise some life.

  6. Last I heard the explanation was that it was psychological. Example: "A few pilots experienced this problem so I am experiencing these problems too." Yeah it's just another BS explanation.

    How much time and money would have to be spent to replace the system in the Raptor fleet with those used on older aircraft (F-15) that are more reliable? I imagine the DoD has weighed this option at some point or another.

  7. So who was burn-face guy and why was his entire combat force made up of helicopter pilots? And how did big boss manage to steal Sam fishers headgear all the way back in 1974?

    I'm still far more excited about murdering everything with a sword and having chainsaw equipped crying wolf as a pet.

    Well it looks like it's set well after 1974. Given Big Bosses age progression and seeing Blackhawks in the footage, I'd bank on early 1980s.

  8. I tip my hat off to one of the greatest pioneers of our time and give my sincerest condolences to his family. While I was born quite some time after the last human set foot on the lunar surface, I hope I get the chance to see humans once again set foot on the celestial body someday. It's why I will always strongly support the space program and space exploration in general.

    Rest in Peace sir.

  9. My point is not even about the invasion of the US itself (in the original). It was that a bunch of kids could take on Russian Spetznaz (at one point) is laughable at best, jingoistic nonsense at worst.

    The original did have one thing going for it, the Hinds they mocked up looked great, and the RPGs actually had a missile trail (OK, two things)

    Out of curiousity, what actual helo's did they use to construct those Hind's? They were modeled after the Hind-A I know that much. Read also that the T-72 they designed looked so authentic that during filming, they had the FBI following them while transporting it.

  10. But there was still enough belief that the USSR had a military that equaled the US, or that the general public never really knew how weak or strong they were. It never made it that much more viable but there was enough to stretch believability. I mean by now we all know that the best way to invade the US is to buy the land cheap. lol. Oh well, can't really discuss it further without getting too political. Let's face it though, North Korea is probably the last country left that Hollywood doesn't mind offending, given their Box Office draw is a big fat zip compared to China, which has a giant movie going population. It's like how they switched China to Australia in Total Recall.

    The other thing to consider in the original RD is that ALOT of domino's had fallen in the stories geopolitical landscape that led to the Soviet invasion.(NATO crumbling) Some of the events that led up to the invasion weren't far out of the realm of possibility either in the real world.

    Sorry for getting political.

    The whole North Korea invading like its Modern Warfare 2 blew my mind alittle at just how corny it was.

×
×
  • Create New...