Jump to content

Bowen

Members
  • Posts

    276
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Bowen

  1. The Super Hornet is a good example of what can be done to "stealthify" an existing airframe. Really, it's about the only serious attempt I know of.

    Speaking of 'stealthification', what's the status on the Silent Eagle project

    Also, any new info at all about those supposed LO Black Hawks used in the Bin Laden raid?

  2. A private MiG-23? Very interesting, hadn't heard of such a thing before.

    According to Wikipedia, there's 11 MiG-23's in private hands, with at least 3 that are "operational" (to quote the site). I wouldn't mind seeing one fly. I like the looks of Russian jets.

    I can't tell a MiG-17 from a -19 either.

    Anyways---I'd say this guy does overall the best LEGO jets out there---any photo in his Flickr account is worth looking at, here's a good starting point:

    http://www.flickr.co...ist/6271483893/

    http://www.flickr.co...ist/6487525793/

    And here's his BIG B-1B:

    http://www.flickr.co...cist/6271962846

    Yeah, MP is great

  3. We probably wouldn't do much better than the late-model WWII planes, I think. If you ban jet engines you could well be banning turboprops - which are, essentially, a jet engine with a propeller...! If you still allow CAD at the design stage, then there might be some interesting designs allowed and also if you allow composite materials and computerised flight controls which may have a significant effect on weight and handling. Electronics are in everything these days, so fuel effiency might be better due to electronic engine controls, but if you don't allow that - well, the late war fighters were pushing the limits of conventional prop design (arguably, the P-38 with its compressibility issues was doing that in 1940!), which is why everyone started moving to jets in the first place.

    We might get a nice discovery channel show about some hotrodders trying to tune fighter engines :p

    Or MTV's new show "Pimp my warbird"

  4. A production F-23A would have had a separate Sidewinder bay right in front of the AMRAAM bay---though it would have been 1 bay that held 2 missiles, rather than the F-22's "1 missile per bay" setup.

    I wonder how the trapeze-racks for the AMRAAMs would've worked out

    If something jams there you'd be down 2 usable missiles instead of just 1

  5. At least it looks better than the F-22. And the competition:

    You know, that middle picture reminds me of a UCAV featured in a certain movie which must not be named, while the bottom one (at least viewed from the top like that) kinda has a BSG Viper thing going on IMO...

×
×
  • Create New...