Jump to content

Raikkonen

Members
  • Posts

    704
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Raikkonen

  1. 3 hours ago, MKT said:

    Scheduled to be released on May 2024. @Raikkonen you got your wish. :good:

    Glorious!!! 

    Quite surprised there's still no hint of a SV-51.

    And I was expecting the VF-22 with this 7 batch.

    Also... they've stopped showing prototypes that are in limbo for a while... wonder if it's sign of permanently abandoning them?

     

  2. 3 minutes ago, Big s said:

    There’s a bit more like the shoulder detail as well as lower legs. I’m gonna have to take a look at the artwork to see what else, but I believe the internal parts and joints are the same, but may just need the outer armor changed up here and there.

    Still curious if they'll add Basara with and without guitar. 

    And happy this is coming soon eventhough I don't care about it, but as it will sell well, it will help getting going my only interest of Macross 7, which are Max's and fodder VF-22. 

  3. 25 minutes ago, Lolicon said:

    +1 to that! How many years has it been since people were singing Bandai's praises because the HMR line was "the most complete line" "the most complete prototype line" of Macross toys? 

     

  4. 5 hours ago, ScrambledValkyrie said:

    I would say the main disappointment with the HMR Tomahawk is its non-existence.

    I was talking in general about the Destroids they've released so far, all with pretty tiny pilotless cockpits. 

    MKT caught what I meant😉

    (But the HMR Tomahawk prototype does exist.)

  5. After looking at the images again of all 3 modes... I think more than the nose being short, it's actually the back being over sized to compensate for the legs in plane mode. 

    Definitely looks like Bandai prioritize transformation, then battroid, while the rest is what it is once it transforms. 

  6. 11 hours ago, Mog said:

    The point still stands though:  the nose and cockpit in fighter mode looks short and stubby on the Bandai.

    And then because of the design choices by Bandai, it still conversely looks too long in battroid mode.

    A quick and dirty shot to try to mimic the angle of the Bandai pic:

    IMG_6594.jpeg.158371387da26295cf93019c8ea29be1.jpeg

    I get what you saying.

    Bandai's picture is taken so that everything around the central point is brought out as much as possible out of perspective, making the nose look smaller than what it is. 

    Eventhough the nose looks shorter vs Yamato's, I don't believe that magazine image is a true indication of any proportions. 

  7. 21 hours ago, Mog said:

    For comparison purposes, Yamato’s 1/60 fighter from a similar angle:

    large.gallery_3595_72_97904.jpg.12d294b8a5333045cb45aba3173a891b.jpg

    Not exactly a perfect match to the Bandai’s angle.  But with the nose closer to the camera, you would expect it to exaggerate the length of the nose a bit.

    IMG_6590.jpeg.b309004a181415eb2500b9da78ccd227.jpeg

    Not seeing that with the Bandai fighter pic is concerning.

    Lol. No.

    Angle's not similar (tip of red fin touches tail in first pic while in second no where near), and... focal point completely different.

  8. 11 hours ago, JB0 said:

    Some people want a minty clean Pontiac Fiero, while acknowledging it is objectively a trash car.

    I don't know how that relates to the topic at hand, but now you know my "suddenly rich" plan.

    Well relates to it as personal preferences are being mentioned. 🤷‍♂️

    Which I started when saying Delta isn't memorable while liking Zero, something like that, to others feeling the opposite. 

  9. 2 hours ago, Master Dex said:

    If you mean subtitled in English, no because this will be, even if it has to be imported.

    But if you mean dubbed... Honestly, I don't think anyone should expect this of any Macross series (except existing non-RT SDFM dubs).

    I genuinely think dubs of any series outside maybe new stuff in this WWM era are unlikely. 

    I meant dubbed.

    I like to most times to just sit back and immerse myself into a different world without reading. 

  10. 3 hours ago, Chronocidal said:

    I wouldn't say those other pictures actually look good, this one just looks even worse.  The nose has always looked far too short to me, but I would like to see an actual flat scan of that photo, as well as the facing page that looks like it details the transformation.

    This doesn't look good?

    IMG_1214.png

  11. 6 minutes ago, Chronocidal said:

    I really hope that's just the magazine photo artificially foreshortening the fighter mode, because that looks REALLY squished up front, like bizarrely out of proportion.

    It really is that. Check the profile pics in plane mode on previous pages here. 

×
×
  • Create New...