pfunk

that was the only ting I liked about Robocop,,, other then that, pretty cheesey

yup, its definatly a +

[indy] It's not the years, honey. It's the mileage. [/indy] I hear that,,, LOL

do you really need a Masters to work at a gas station, damn, they are getting strict,,, Oh, Im Pfunk everywhere

I always thought that you MW bashers were stupid but I never thought you were also ignorant and idiotic to the point of making statements that were above and beyond reason. How the FU@K do you say that my making $75,000 a year with a masters is low. It's actually high considering my entry level status, you idiots. $55,000 is average for a Masters degree. If youdon't believe me then look at this link and get educated because you neanderthals need it: Median salaries I always say that school is important and some of you really need it bad because you have just proven that G.E.D's and H.S. diplomas only make you look $tupid and allow idiotic statements on your behalfs. well, I make allmost double that with just an associates,, yeah, Im a stupid head. oh, I have 3 cars all paid for, and I bet my truck costs as much as all your cars,,,Im not getting into my other things,,,,that would be petty

Dude, this thread is totally sane. MGrexxx is probably enjoying this as much as everyone else. He enjoys being the lone fan. He is kind of like the Lone Ranger but instead on Tonto, he has Tommy Yune. or hes crying himself to sleep,,, agh, sorry DA I cant controll myself

I wanna stay out of this. I really do. But, something isn't quite right. You say you have an advanced degree, a house, a family, and a $75,000 a year career. BUT Judging by your posts, you have the maturity level of a 14 year old! I smell bull***t. I don't know that anyone could accomplish all that before they finish puberty. BTW, I've been around for a while. I used to lurk on the old boards but now I post from time to time. well, we CAN call him on that. MGREXX, what is your masters degree in and what college did you get it from? Give us the name attached to the degree and we can look it up. It's not at all difficult to do. that would suck, 75g's with a masters

Im 30 and still get a party every year,,, bring a bottle and a dish. its just a good ecxcuse to have freinds over

woohoo... CONGRATULATIONS one big pfunk... and a little one to enjoy... be sure to change those little funky diapers. thanks man yeah, should change my handle to B(baby) Funk,,,

wouldve been your daddy, but that damn german shepard beat me over the fence

Im,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, going to have a baby boy,,,,,just found out yesterday we want the funk gotta have the funk now,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

I was allways under the asumption bigger wasn't stronger, low rep high weight, moving up in weight after each set will get larger mass and obviuoslly steroid ussers use this technique. thier are certain individuals that in strength training they do 5 sets high reps moving down in weight. My 1st time heavy working out I ussed this technique. Second recentlt I started working out to gain muscle mass, in 3 sets low reps moving up a lot in weight between sets and it really showed fast larger and in quicker time then before. Now this is personally for me and others will be different. not including ideas of muscle memory and age (8 yrs apart) I felt a lot healther when I was working out with a high number of sets and it seemed to stick a lot longer (mentabolism, strenght and energy) although recently I was able to lift heavier and looked a lot bigger. before body fat was really low, now its a bit higher,,, age, Im not sure, not to mention after working out now, my joints hurt more then they did,,, (friggin skull crushers) I really think I want to get back into the higher reps/sets lower weight, instead of trying to look big and have denser mass instead of more mass my 3 cents

Glad you liked it! It is obvious when watching that movie that his success is no accident. Thanks arnold to make people believe that being big == having strength What do you mean? Being big DOES mean having strength. I mean with certain steriods you can have a greater cellular volumization due to water retention druing a cycle, but it is a well known fact that a bigger muscle is a stronger muscle. Here is a picture of my back, the only reason it looks like that is I do HEAVY deadlifts, partials actually with 1500 Lbs. Whats that white spot thier JK BTW, my stuffs all taken apart in the new house, I want to finish the basement and Ill have about 600 SQ' workout area and bathroom/shower

I'm big time american car guy, but I like the Z,,, over a M3, I wouldnt take it though. Those M3's are pretty darn quick for what they are, havent driven a Z yet oh and that ol Chevy truck is Very Nice,,, cant wait to get into building Hot Rods again,,,,just need to build a place to do it

sounds like my buddie with his 396 and a 6/71 charger on it,,,,,PUT SOME DAMN TIRES ON THAT THING,,, instead of replacing the 14" wheels (1970 Chevelle) he decided to put a roll cage in it to keep the factory wheels,,, nothing is more dangerous then factory suspension and wheel tire combo with high HP numbers,, ,exactlly like my other freinds 69 rs/ss 600+hp smal block 4 speed, went for a ride one day,, hitting second gear, the car jumped across 2 lanes,, been trying to talk him into traction bars, ,,,,but they look ugly hanging down,,, better then recking a 35,000mile car Or that "one" incedent,, was at a car show ya know guys doing burnouts and such leaving,,, well some crackhead in a tubbed (not done right(leafs)) late 70's z lost control and hit a 1970 LS6 car,,, the car was recentlly frame off right down to the wide ovals I just hate when people put 500+hp engine in and dont update the rest of the car I swear thiers a junkyard around here that has 10 twisted Fox body mustangs Just make it safe man, traction bars are ugly, but twisting the axle soo much that your switching lanes is uglier

I hate body work, I wish I wasnt good at it, That T/A is gonna cook. you breaking it in on a dyno?, with that much engine mods, it'd be nice to know the flywheel, definatly not your SBC formula's Lotta Pontiac guys around here,, mostlly "A" body goat guys and a few T/A's Fellas should head up to the Woodward Cruise one year,,,, thiers an empty lot next door for camping

yeah, what he said.

Fixed it for you. Sorry, but while its terrible to see such nice cars destroyed I can only read so many stories about "17 year old takes daddy's car for a joyride" before I stop caring. Heck, there was a clown here in town a few years ago who decided to play bumper cars with a phone pole (the telephone pole won) in his daddy's Viper. He managed to kill himself and his friend. I like to call it "bad key placement" and let it be known, if you dont kill yourself in it, I'll do ya the favor. That was taught to me at a very young age and I had a lot of respect for HP going from 180hp s-10 and graduating to driving cars with 500+ (one job, got to drive a Viper racecar, definatly not for the timid in driving skills, that thing could turn around on you at damn near any speed. I have never driven a stock one though. the one I drove was supposidlly 650+hp GTS,,, didnt feel like it though, guess Im ussed to violent HP and not as smooth as that was)

LOL, thats french

what about the 428 S.O. smoke a Hemi too bad they discontinued the 427 engines from the Thunderbolts and Cyclones,,, prolly wouldve bent a mustang in 2 the 440's a better engine for a few reasons: 1) affordability 2) tuneability (It came from the factory running better than the Hemi) 3) TORQUE!!! 4) even though it was a little short on the HP compared to the Hemi, a 440 Roadrunner could beat a Hemi Roadrunner out of the factory 5) 440's lighter than the Hemi. so as much of a moparite as I am, the 427 Side Oiler could keep up with or possibly pass the Hemi, but if both cars were tuned (not modified, tuned) the Hemi would beat it. both cars "tuned", no way, thats proven time again at the track. Hemi is overrated IMHO ( even though I do like em) Fastest street car back in the day was the ZL1 Vette. they didnt consider them cause only 2 were sold to the public. with headers and slicks, the white one ran 10:90's consistantly and the only reason the zl1 Camaro didnt make it down the track well was suspension and not being able to put a good size slick under it only running 12's (tunned) But the one guy running full stock musclecar class and winning against all is a 1971 Buick GS 455 Stage 1 Automatic running consistant high 11's,,, they allow slicks, open exhaust and a traction devise (leaf spring cars only)

all right, here we go Horse walks into a bar,,, bartender asks,, Hey? Why the long face?

I think I accused him of having his head up your ass. But there's a difference between 'kissing' and a 'rimjob,' or at least that's what Duke's mom tells me. ouch, kinda harsh

Confirmed LOL, I am kidding

Oh...make me go through all my boxes of books, why don't you? I do remember that it wasn't the side oiler.

like this one http://www.thunderbolt.cc/ I knew a guy that had the cyclone (detuned) and a guy at the woodward cruise who owned a Cyclone supercar (The Original Cyclone) ran 10.50 on biasply slicks,, not too shabby for a 60's car