Jump to content

myk

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6116

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by myk

  1. myk
    I want side-stories. They can take my idea for free about Dr. Jenner from season 1, about he and his wife and colleagues dealing with the outbreak and then up to the point where he meets Rick...
  2. myk
    I think Mike said it best: "GET OUT" LOL...
  3. myk
    Merle?
  4. myk
    Psh. ROTF was such a pile on so many levels I can't believe it exists. Anyway thanks for posting that awesome set of pictures Mike; figure collecting has truly evolved...
  5. myk
    This is what I feel to be the most disappointing of all. I relished the idea of the Governor, as a man on his own, experiencing an epiphany and then going through the process of changing his ways. Instead, we're just getting a reboot of the evil Jim Jones in Woodbury. I look at this return to his previous ways as a gravely missed opportunity. However with this at his disposal: I'm wondering how Rick and company are going to get out of it this time...
  6. myk
    Can't decide if that first girl looks hotter with her clothes on, or off...
  7. myk
    I've been lusting for their Lara Croft figure; I'll pick that up eventually...
  8. myk
    I was a teenager during the days that 21 JS was a t.v. series, and I always believed this show was important because it covered a lot of issues that teenagers had to face and that their parents refused to address; violence, death, rape, preganancy, narcotics, broken families, or D: ALL OF THE ABOVE. The fact that 21 JS was then converted into a completely unfunny movie with two leads who have the same amount of charisma and chemistry as two pet rocks just insults the great thing that 21 JS was back-in-the-day. I will say of this retro-resurrection the same thing that I decree for all others: if it came from the 80's, and possibly the 90's, it's better just to leave it there...
  9. myk
    With those numbers (for laptops and t.v.'s) it looks to me as if we've become accustomed to failure with electronic devices. It's not as if we have the capability to live "without" these devices, so we cry and complain but ultimately allow these products to shove their brand of pacifier in our mouths and move onward...
  10. myk
    Part of me misses those days, lack of intrawebz and all...
  11. myk
    There are all kinds of ways they could run with sidestories. Again I think it'd be a good way for the series to prevent becoming Walker-stale and even give us more of a Walking Dead universe to contemplate. Hell I would LOVE to see a sidestory based on Dr. Jenner from season 1...
  12. myk
    Good God you're right. I don't think the concept of the internet even qualified as a random thought with potential, back then..
  13. myk
    I hope he does. You know, maybe they can take another break from Rick and the prison gang and do a couple episodes covering Morgan and his experiences after he and Rick parted ways. That'd be a good way to keep the series from being as rotten as its walkers...
  14. myk
    Morgan? Yeah what a sad fate to befall someone. I don't know if I'd rather be dead or alive as the "last man alive" in a dead city...
  15. myk
    I picked up 'Rivals for my PS4 and..I don't think any other launch title has ever put me to sleep...
  16. myk
    I absolutely LOVE the break from 'ol Rick and the prison gang, and I LOVE the direction they're taking the Governor character into. "Bad guys" will always be more interesting than good guys, and a story that shows a relatively evil character going through his own motions is intriguing. I'm actually looking forward to watching the next episode again...
  17. myk
    Seriously? Well then they better not frak the ending up...
  18. myk
    Nothing news-worthy here, just typical launch-system blues. Curious, did the much simpler N64 have teething problems when it was launched back in the 90's?
  19. myk
    Looking forward to this; I can't wait to see what outfits that juicy Jennifer Lawrence is going to be squeezing herself into...
  20. myk
    If there's discussion about New York in the t.v. show you'll have to excuse me as I haven't seen it. Then again, it's just "talk," and talk is cheap. What about these "consequences" that everyone keeps harping about? I will grant you guys that Stark had to deal with PTSD in Ironman 3, but unless I'm misunderstanding everyone here there's still no instance of consequences in the form of public scrutiny brought directly upon the heads of the Avengers, Superman, etc. The PTSD is a "personal issue" as far as I'm concerned. Again, I really think the idea of "consequences" is a small point; VALID, for sure, but small IMO...
  21. myk
    So are you telling me that the Avengers answered for the destruction that they caused? Did Tony Stark "answer for it" in Iron Man 3? Did Thor "answer for it" in Thor 2? Those movies and others like them of course being nothing but filler between Avenger movies? Let's not forget there was also mass-destruction in those two movies as well but neither Stark or Thor faced any consequences for the destruction that they helped to cause YET AGAIN. Did YOU watch the clip? It doesn't MATTER what the politician or what anyone else says because NONE of the Avengers or any of the members of SHIELD were brought under scrutiny or trial for what happened! There was NO justice brought upon by anyone for the destruction of the city. I'm guessing that the point that you keep trying to make is that you wanted someone in MOS to at least "comment" on the destruction that happened in the movie? Because there certainly weren't any repercussions or punishment on the heroes in either the Avengers, Thor or Ironman. I'll agree there were some "comments" though. Clearly you and I see these movies VERY differently and we're just going to butt heads at this point...
  22. myk
    All the stuff you listed is inferred from what "probably" happened; there's no proof or canon that shows any of the things that you listed outside of what we saw in the movie. Again, untold destruction in both movies and no one seemed to really give a frak-certainly not me...
  23. myk
    That touching montage at the end doesn't count; that news clip shows the "people" recovering; it doesn't show the Avengers being held accountable or holding themselves accountable for the destruction they've caused, or contemplating the meaning of the insane battle that just happened. The Avengers, like Kal, just wiped their hands clean and flew off into the credits. I'm not denying that MOS doesn't have faults, or didn't miss the things that you mentioned; I will agree with you on that point, I just don't see the idea of consequences in the movie as being all that....consequential...
  24. myk
    That's ONE instance brother, and it was set up just to show how noble Steve Rogers is, because quite frankly he's worthless otherwise. I can think of two instances off of the top of my head in MOS where Superman actively saved humans that may have been affected by his "super" battle. Ultimately, a scorecard tallying human "saves" is irrelevant; I see NO difference between the Avenger's battle and Kal's. BOTH fought to stop a threat that would have killed that much more if it had gone unabated, and both the Avengers and Kal flew off into the sunset without nary a thought to the carnage that they both caused. Were there casualties? Yes. Could they have been avoided? No! How do you stop a battle between super-beings from taking bystander-casualties? When you consider that Kal and Zod are capable of flying at the speed of sound does anyone actually believe that it's possible to "take the fight away" from innocent bystanders? Question: would all of you have been satisfied if Kal sat down on the highest mountain in the world at the end of the movie and cried about all of the stuff he broke and the people that might have gotten hurt during his battle?
  25. myk
    Maybe I missed it, but how did the Avengers "address" the deaths of civilians in New York or anywhere else in the movie? You mean the part where Bruce Banner comically rides up on a motor cycle and says, "....so, this all looks.......HORRIBLE?" with a slight smile on his face? The Avengers rode off into the sunset, all smiles and sexy outfits, cool cars and digesting shwarma at the end of the movie. Someone even asked where the Avengers were after the battle in New York, but there was no soul-searching, consequences or coming to terms with the destruction that they were a part of making. Furthermore, I'm sorry if you see Kal's "moping" to be all about nothing in the movie; his internal conflict was very clear, and it is something that I'm sure most of us have had to wrestle with for much of our lives. If you don't care to acknowledge it and just write it off as moping about nothing then that's your choice. I appreciate what you outlined above as a preferred way to carry out the movie, but Superman and the Avengers aren't the only franchises to completely ignore the casualties they've caused, leaving that question unanswered. Personally, I can't readily think of one single movie or story that takes significant time to process the damage and casualties that have been caused, whether it was between Isamu and Guld's city battle back in the 90's or Man of Steel today. Quite frankly, the idea of civilian casualties is a non-issue IMO; they're not really essential to most stories, and certainly not the ones we're discussing now. Man of Steel really bothers you, doesn't it?
×
×
  • Create New...