Jump to content

My MiG-45 Valhalla Project


Vostok 7

Recommended Posts

Back on the old forums shortly before the switch I posted my MiG-45 Valhalla project. Well, it's long gone along with the old forum, but I found the images I made the other day and thought I'd post them.

It all started with this sketch:

MiG-33-head.jpg

The MiG-33, NATO Reporting Name: Victor was supposed to be the Soviet "version" of the VF-1A, made cheaper and more simply (and therefore more rugged and easier to maintain) in the true Russian fashion. The first ground for the MiG-33 actually broke long before Macross Zero, and I've had to adjust some things since then, but despite having dropped the project for around 6 years, I plan to resurrect it with a good bit of well educated fanon ;)

The MiG-33 evolved into the MiG-45, NATO Reporting Name: Valhalla:

MiG-45%20Head%202.jpg

Shown here as a teaser lineart in SVFA-307 297th Black Wolf Squadron colors:

MiG-45%20BW%20Teaser.jpg

And the full lineart:

MiG-45%20Head%20Lineart%201.jpg

As you can see, it's essentially a -1A head with a fixed ballistic cannon (can't remember the bore at the moment, I believe it was based on a standard Russian aircraft cannon) instead of an elevation-adjustable laser cannon. The ammo feed is in the back, the ammo would have been stored in the chest section of the battroid (or the fuselage of the fighter). I never got around to designing the fighter, something I plan to do now, and I might adjust the head (I want to make it more VF-0A-ish).

Here's the squadron logo:

wolflogo.jpg

And here's the Black Wolf Squadron's VF-1A's color scheme:

BWVF-1.jpg

Hopefully I'll get to work on this a little more and finally flesh it out a little bit ;)

Stay tuned for some back history on the MiG-45 in general!

Vostok 7

Edited by Vostok 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm... Well, It looks like it's Russian; copy of an American plane... Though, it really wouldn't be fair to call the Valkyrie American... I'd like to know more, Vostok. Sounds cool.

It wasn't so much intended to be a copy of the Valkyrie, more their "take" on it based on limited information before the actual VF-1 came out. But that was all before Macross Zero came out, and long before we knew anything about the SV-51 (though we still don't know much).

The profile views at the bottom are of the later VF-1 in the color scheme of the squadron I came up with for this whole project. The actual MiG will look much more... MiG like... :lol:

Vostok 7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In Soviet Russia, Chunky Monkey is in scale with you! :D

:lol: What I love about the MiG-25 and -31 is that they just positively DRIP with '60s and '70s Soviet design philosophy. The MiG-29 and later Sukhois are just too "pretty". In the space-race (and in some ways, air-race) times of the '60s and '70s, the Soviet philosophy was make it as simple as possible, strap some huge arse engines on it, and see if it will go fast :lol: America was much more about finesse and figuring everything out in the design studio and windtunnels first. Not that there isn't a lot of advanced (for the time) technology behind the MiG-25 and -31 (at the time they set the standards for materials and construction techniques for Mach 2+ interceptors), but there was also a lot of simplistic things (avionics, control systems, etc.) for ease of maintenance.

On a similar vein, the F-104 Starfighter is still one of my most favorite American jet fighter designs, mostly because it's basically an intercontinental missile with a pilot :lol:

Vostok 7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't get me wrong, I like Russian fighters. I just happen to like the "finesse" (Not really) of American planes more. I mean, look at the F-14D. That thing was curvy in all the right places, but it had huge engines... Bigger still, than the Su-33D or the MiG-29. That thing was big. Heaviest carrier aircraft in US history and the Largest Carrier Fighter in US history. Up with the Russians. However, what I like most about American planes is, though they're damned advanced and not simplistic, they're easy to fix and they don't break as often.

Add to that, our bombers are pressurized... :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...