Jump to content

fulcy

Members
  • Posts

    700
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by fulcy

  1. Yamato may be releasing this similar to the 1/60 cannon fodder - releasing a special one (like the TRU 1/60 CF), and then releasing a regular production run of it, in a slightly different color...

  2. If everything is selling out Yamato would be crazy not to reissue more valks.

    Well, I think we can look at the 1/60's - Yamato flooded the market with them, and their value dropped like a rock (not to mention alot of the 1/60's went back on the market once the 1/48's came out). They probably learned from that experience, that it's better to undersaturate the market, then oversaturate it - it's always better to have a demand, then there be little to no demand. Then, if they decide to say, rerelease the 1/48 VF-1J Hikaru for the GBP armor release, they can justify it, because not only the people who want the valk for the GBP will be happy, but others who want to buy more valks (kensei, spiff) can purchase some more, and justify to Yamato the cost of either fixing the molds, or making new ones (really depends on how many parts they've made from each mold)...

  3. What I'm wondering is how the backpack for the VT-1 and VE-1 will fold up in battroid mode.  Don't forget, the tailfins don't fold away like the regular VF-1.  So how's the backpack supposed to support the weight of the fastpacks without the backpack folded all the way back?  Does anyone here know how the 1/60's managed this?

    Personally, if push came to shove, I'd have no problem if John fudged it and went the 1/55 route (just fold the wings away like a regular battroid).  :)

    Just reflecting back on this old post, I think that the tailfins have to be flat. Remember that the 1/48 has a little hinge to secure the backpack when the fighter mounts FAST Packs. How is it going to be secure when we do barrel rolls and stuff like that when the backpack is higher relative to the fighter?

    As I said in a previous post - it's up to the captain to make these design decisions, not us. Let the man work his magic, and we'll be surprised by the results ;)

  4. ...What's my decision? I'm lost :unsure:

    Hi Capt! We're just talking about the structure of the tailfins of the VT and VE and the alignment of the backpack. I was wondering if the current booster sections of the FAST packs could be compatible for the VT and VE custom. I was thinkin that I could still use the booster and put on the new anterior sections (like those round thingys for the VT) . Or do you plan on making a whole new FAST Packs design?

    Well, the booster on the VT is completely different than the normal booster, so there would need to be a new one sculpted. For the VE, it's only really a new tip put on the end. But, I was trying to say before that it's up to Capt whether the tailfin is folded up like in the normal super armor configuration, or if the tailfins are fixed open, like in the Hasegawa models.

  5. As far as I can tell, 'R's don't exist - looked around, and couldn't find even a listing for it, and did a google search for the kit itself, and couldn't find one hit for it - only listing I found for it was on HLJ... I'm half tempted to make my own, but god, that would take me what, 10 years to finish?!?!

  6. Rob. I see you are a servant of that lady... just like all of us married mans.

    Fulcy. Sorry, truth hurts sometimes.

    So... What IF you two switch proyects??? So Fulcy can have a supper cool looking proyect like the SPT that is gonna be finished and deleivered in the next 3 years... and Rob can take another 8 years to finish Fulcy's armored gearwalk???

    hu? Sounds cool he? hu?

    :lol:

    i don't care what you say, I love the ugly duckling of the Macross world! :p

×
×
  • Create New...