Okay, perhaps I need to elaborate.
I understand that a certain degree of grain on older, non-digital celluloid film based movies is expected when remastering/upscaling/etc. What I don't understand is why the level of grain is so all over the place, in terms of consistency, on the 2007 DYRL remaster DVD.
Some scenes I don't even notice the grain at all. Some scenes, the grain is a pleasant accent. But in some scenes the grain is this obnoxious, overpowering, fuzzy static haze that is absolutely deleterious to the image quality and viewing experience. (This is especially prominent in scenes with a lot of pitch black darks.)
It's to the point where even though the HD Remaster is an official licensed product, I find myself pining for literal bootlegs that I used to own. I'm just curious how or why they dropped the ball this bad? Did they at least get things right on the Blu-ray releases?