Are you twins or what ?
Seriously though ;
I understand scales pretty well , and I know the size of a toy (in scale) is proportionate to the real size of the original object , and you´re right m I just decided to be economic with my words last time around , but you´re statement is right.
I´m also bothered that some of people in favour of 1/48 M+ toys don´t understand that , for example , the size of a 1/48 toy is relative to the size of the original object , and they just make fools of themselves by screaming for 1/48 M+ toys for the sake of having something 1/48 which is total nonsense as well.
I´m not sure if something as big and expensive as a 1/48 M+ toy would make such a good display piece. For that price (which I pressume will be pretty high) then you´re better off getting some model kits as display pieces ; what´s the point of having a transformable display piece if it´s too cumbersome to be transformed , let alone the fact that the level of detail is not at all in proportion to the size of an object , i.e. Bigger is not always better.
I would much rather prefer Yamato to release humanly affordable (they would be about as expensive as the 1/48 VF-1s) 1/60 M+ and M0 toys than uber impractical 1/48 M+/M0 toys.
And for the record , I have the space and financial resources to get various 1/48 M+ toys , but even so , I feel it´ll be a comeplete waiste of time for Yamato and us if they decide to go the 1/48 way in regards to M0 and M+ toys. I want to make clear that I´m not against the idea of having M+ and M0 toys of equal size and detail as the 1/48 VF-1 toys , that´s why I´m in favour of the 1/60 scale M+ toys.