vibayo Posted January 26, 2004 Share Posted January 26, 2004 Hello,i have began my Macross collection only months ago and so i'm exploring all the things,but i'm stucked with some things, the most important, The Yamato Valks. I'm trying to have all the models,i mean one VF-1A,one VF-1J,one VF-1S,one YF-19,one YF-21,etc...(with every paint scheme) But i have found out that they aren't in the same escale some are 1/60,some are 1/72 and for the moment,one in 1/48 (the VF-1A with low visibility scheme) Why not having all of them in 1/60??? what i mean is that every valk or destroid that they release,could be at 1/48,1/55,1/72,whatever they want, but making an 1/60 version at least (and re-editing the past ones of course ). I'm begging for this to make dioramas with real scale between all the things i have exposed (vaks,destroids,people,etc...) and to see the differences on size more accurately between them. Thanks for your kind attention,sorry for my bad english (i'm from Spain) and have a nice day! PS I CAN'T WAIT TO OWN THE 1/60 DESTROID MONSTER TOY!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GobotFool Posted January 26, 2004 Share Posted January 26, 2004 As much as I love 1/48th scale, for me the 1/60th scale is the ideal scale for a full valk line up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newca Posted January 26, 2004 Share Posted January 26, 2004 I prefer a whole 1/72 line, since most "real" planes have been made into this scale. but I'm happy with all kinds of scales any way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick_Randy Posted January 26, 2004 Share Posted January 26, 2004 If only they made 1/60 valks like they did the 1/48 (with the legs attached) I'd have no beef with it and would start collecting them again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewilen Posted January 26, 2004 Share Posted January 26, 2004 I'd prefer that a consistent scale across Macross items be available, and since so much stuff has already come out in 1/60, I think that would be the best. But I personally wouldn't complain if it was suddenly all redone in 1/72, since I currently only own one 1/60 Yammie, and as newca said, 1/72 is a standard scale for model planes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shin Densetsu Kai 7.0 Posted January 26, 2004 Share Posted January 26, 2004 me 2 randy...me 2. The 1/48 is awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imode Posted January 26, 2004 Share Posted January 26, 2004 1:60 as a scale is nice. Too bad the quality of Yamato's 1:60 line is whack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
do not disturb Posted January 26, 2004 Share Posted January 26, 2004 mad 1/60 haters out there huh? well me, i like the 1/60's and its the only scale i got every valk in...yes the QC could be better. and BTW, wheres that 1/60 low-viz yamato!!! and while the 1/48's are nice, its too expensive for me as well as others to collect them all. and with no diecast content, they're just plain cheap IMHO. you have to get the FP's(another $50-$60) to beef them up. also, a complete collection of 1/48's would cost well over $1000. i'm sure some of you got deep pockets, but thats too deep for me. everyones got a good point about 1/72 scale but how small would the valk be then? and will yamato be able to make it transformable in that scale? without QC issues? i doubt it. <_< i say they keep making the scales they're making, that way people can buy what they can afford. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewilen Posted January 26, 2004 Share Posted January 26, 2004 Dimensions of a 1/72 Valkyrie: Wing span 20.5 cm/8.1" Fighter length: 19.8 cm/7.8" Battroid height: 17.6 cm/6.9" The Bandai HCM's are 1/72 and manage a pretty good near-perfect transformation, albeit with swingbars. Here's the VF-1S Hikaru DYRL HCM. Posability is the same as a Chunky Monkey. I think with modern technology, a good 1/72 would be quite practical, at least using the 1/60-style leg transformation. Which I personally don't mind at all. Also, personal taste here, I much prefer strong plastics to metal, except in high-stress areas. Should keep the price down, improves the balance, and less subject to paint chipping. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vibayo Posted January 27, 2004 Author Share Posted January 27, 2004 Well,i think that some of you missunderstood me,what i mean is that Yamato should continue doing the Valks and destroids in the scale they want (is their company,so they can do what they want ) but making also an 1/60 scale model. I have also forgotten to say that it has to be perfect transformation and that i don't mind really much if it's 1/60 or 1/72,but for sure,if they do something,i think they would do in 1/60,because most of their toys are in 1/60 now,so why change it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
connor99 Posted January 27, 2004 Share Posted January 27, 2004 I've been wondering about the same thing, V! But to tell ya the truth I'm happy YAMATO made their toys in diff. scale, this way we, as collectors, would have a lot more option and/ or variety. Take for example my own collection. As of right now, 99% of my valks are in the 1/60 scale. I do have a 1/48 of the VF-1S HIKARU, but of course, I consider this particular valk my price possession and that my friend is the only reason why I bought it in that particular scale. And as for the perfect transformation, one of the reasons might be that there's a degree of difficulty involved in having to duplicate the perfect transformation onto a 1/60. It's either that or YAMATO just got lazy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hiriyu Posted January 27, 2004 Share Posted January 27, 2004 1:60 as a scale is nice. Too bad the quality of Yamato's 1:60 line is whack. 1:48 as a scale is also nice. Too bad the look and proportions of Yamato's 1:48 line is whack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts