JET7 Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 (edited) just a quick animated thought question,.. on which particular weapon armament setup will inflict or carry out the most potent damage to any moving or stationary enemy? me and my macross friend just having a friendly debate about this SETUP A SETUP B SETUP C thanks for your answers Edited March 24, 2011 by JET7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treatment Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 (edited) those look like the crappiest valks i'd ever seen... just joshing with yah, dude. anyway, setup-a should inflict the most damage since those are damn nukes on the wings. unless they're duds... Edited March 24, 2011 by treatment Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aurascope Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 8 nukes on the wings and double strike cannons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JET7 Posted March 24, 2011 Author Share Posted March 24, 2011 (edited) @treatment, its 1/144 scale by chara-works.. seriously are you expecting a yamato perfection on this scale? give me a break. anyway, thanks for your answer. : Edited March 24, 2011 by JET7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xx-SKULL-ONE-xX Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 8 nukes on the wings and double strike cannons. Oooh double strike....Good answer. Depends on the purpose would be my answer. For Large hard targets like Warships and Carriers Reaction warheads and double strike would be the way to go. If I was strictly fighting fighters I would want 4X micro missile pods underwing and 2X micro missile pylons on the boosters. IMO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JET7 Posted March 24, 2011 Author Share Posted March 24, 2011 Oooh double strike....Good answer. Depends on the purpose would be my answer. For Large hard targets like Warships and Carriers Reaction warheads and double strike would be the way to go. If I was strictly fighting fighters I would want 4X micro missile pods underwing and 2X micro missile pylons on the boosters. IMO so, by ranking you would choose C, B, and A being the less potent weapon on the situation. right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frogze Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 Max's TV VF-1A, with a gunpod Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neova Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 I know you wanted to choose between a,b or c but if this was in space, there is only one choice with the VF-1x platform: Stampede Valkyrie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jasonc Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 Stampede would probably be most deadly. As pointed out, it depends on your target. If the target was ships, or fortresses, I'd say the RMS payload (A) would be the best payload, and the standard strike canon setup for secondary targets. This, of course, depends on the number of ships. If you have one or two primary ship or base targets, and have a decent opposing secondary target, I'd take option B, with the standard strike setup. Now, if there's nothing but Regults, fighter pods, and the sort, you'd probably want a spread of many missiles that will keep the enemy off concentrating on hitting you. You'd probably also want a weapon system that can track and destroy multiple targets, a few times over. For that, you'd probably want a full Micro missile payload, or the micro-missiles, with the larger missiles for maybe the one eyed larger ships (forgot what they're called). Then, I'd go for option c, with standard strike, or dual strike canon layout. I'm not sure, but the missiles, based on what is shown in the shows, seem to have different properties. The RMS missiles seem to be a bit slower and easier to shoot down. The micro missiles seem very fast and maneuverable, but probably don't hit nearly as hard. Not sure about the medium sized ones, but that's what I get from seeing the show. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archer Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 (edited) Actually, in terms of what the OP posted, I believe that it all depends, but for the most balanced situations, I think set up b or c would work best. Where as nukes are great an all, from what I have seen in macross, they a are a bit slower than regular missiles and less maneuverable as well. If you are up against a big or stationary target, then sure, set up A would be great, but for all other situations where the enemies are small and agile, i think a set like b or c with box missiles deliver a more effective payload. Just my humble $0.02 EDIT: Just noticed that Jasonc posted nearly the identical thing. Sorry for the repitition, but yeah, I agree with him! Edited March 24, 2011 by Archer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derex3592 Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 Max's TV VF-1A, with a gunpod LMAO!! Yeeeeesss!!! good one! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uxi Posted March 25, 2011 Share Posted March 25, 2011 They're both going to have issues without their intake covers closed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UN Spacy Posted March 25, 2011 Share Posted March 25, 2011 OPTION D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eugimon Posted March 25, 2011 Share Posted March 25, 2011 (edited) There's always the "yf-2ss" configuration Edited March 25, 2011 by eugimon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UN Spacy Posted March 25, 2011 Share Posted March 25, 2011 Hahahahahahhaa.....good one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graham Posted March 25, 2011 Share Posted March 25, 2011 VF-25 with Armoured pack + reaction missiles or VF-25 with Tornado pack. Tornado pack is awesome. Graham Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raptormesh Posted March 25, 2011 Share Posted March 25, 2011 Hahahahahahhaa.....good one. I especially like it how the Ghost had its front gear extended, probably to keep it in place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JET7 Posted March 25, 2011 Author Share Posted March 25, 2011 (edited) sorry guys, im not fond of macross plus,zero,frontier,7.. only tv/dyrl for me. so i cannot comprehend those vfs other than the "more earthly looking" machines of tv and dyrl. Edited March 25, 2011 by JET7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neova Posted March 25, 2011 Share Posted March 25, 2011 VF-25 with Armoured pack + reaction missiles or VF-25 with Tornado pack. Tornado pack is awesome. Graham I just saw the Bandai 1/72 model of the VF-25F Tornado set and it cost MORE than the armored 25S or F! That must be totally badass then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
valhary Posted March 25, 2011 Share Posted March 25, 2011 max with the thunder hammer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
regult Posted March 28, 2011 Share Posted March 28, 2011 I still think Max Jenius with a TV version VF-1A and a gunpod is the deadliest VF-1 you can ever get. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrhillz Posted March 28, 2011 Share Posted March 28, 2011 OPTION D Your winner right there! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicaragua Posted March 28, 2011 Share Posted March 28, 2011 OPTION D i vote option D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.