lechuck Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 The 1/60 Kakizaki thread was discussing the lame VF-1R variant that HG established. So it got me thinking about those other VF-1[A,J,S]R's from the Macross 2036 game. Would anybody be interested if Yamato wanted to do this? I think I would, I love those head variants and boosters without the rest of fast pack kibble. It seems quite feasible to do, with the elongated fuselage probably being the most tricky part. Post your thoughts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miriya Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 VF-3000 for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UN Spacy Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 Sure. As long as they release the VF-4 first. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blacklotus Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 Sure. As long as I get my SDF-1, Monster, Regults and Glaugs first. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anime52k8 Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 sure. As long as they do a VF-4, VF-14, VF-17, VF-3000, VF-5000, VF-9, VA-3, Monster, v.2 Q-Rau, Glaug, Regult, Gnerl, Variable Glaug, SDP-1, Orguss Valkyrie, VERF-1, Feios Valkyrie, SW-XAII Schneegans, 1/2000 scale factory satellite... Seriously though, I've never been a fan of the R versions from the 2036 game or any of the alternate timeline designs (2036, eternal love song and MacII are all part of the same timeline right? Seto?) for that matter. If Yamato or bandai (depends on who has the licence, I think bandai is more likely though) wants to make toys out of them that's fine but there are a ton of toys I'd rather buy before this, including MacII valks (I dislike them very much but I still think they're better than the 2036 designs.) And if we're talking about Valks/mechs from PC engine game's I'd much rather see stuff from SDFM: Remember Me. the SDP-1 is one of my favorite valks, I would totally get one (it would be even better if they released it as an add on that you could attach to the existing v.2's) also Maybe I'm the only one who thinks this but the Maverick is an awesome Destroid, and it's the same from the waist down as the Tomahawk/Defender/Phalanx so Yamato's already half way there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchizophrenicMC Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 *Remembers how much he wants a sexy SDP-1* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omegablue Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 sure. As long as they do first Max & Millia's 1J's, a VF-0D, VF-2S, a VF-4, VF-14, VF-17, VF-3000, VF-5000, VF-9, VA-3, Monster, v.2 Q-Rau, Glaug, Regult, Gnerl, Variable Glaug, SDP-1, Orguss Valkyrie, VERF-1, Feios Valkyrie, SW-XAII Schneegans, 1/2000 scale factory satellite... I dunno about these. I like the heads, but that nose cone is scary and ugly. As for the SDP-1, it's too Gundumb for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vi-RS Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 Ouch, that looks like a cross between vf-1s and rx-78 with typical gundam color. macrossdam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thankheaven Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 (edited) The 1/60 Kakizaki thread was discussing the lame VF-1R variant that HG established. So it got me thinking about those other VF-1[A,J,S]R's from the Macross 2036 game. Would anybody be interested if Yamato wanted to do this? I think I would, I love those head variants and boosters without the rest of fast pack kibble. It seems quite feasible to do, with the elongated fuselage probably being the most tricky part. Post your thoughts. Well if they can make the VT-1 and VE-1 which are rather different from the standard VF-1 i see no problem in them making these. Those boosters reminds me of the atmospheric fastpacks on the VF-11C for some reason. Edited July 2, 2009 by thankheaven Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadow strikers Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 sure. As long as they do a VF-4, VF-14, VF-17, VF-3000, VF-5000, VF-9, VA-3, Monster, v.2 Q-Rau, Glaug, Regult, Gnerl, Variable Glaug, SDP-1, Orguss Valkyrie, VERF-1, Feios Valkyrie, SW-XAII Schneegans, 1/2000 scale factory satellite... Seriously though, I've never been a fan of the R versions from the 2036 game or any of the alternate timeline designs (2036, eternal love song and MacII are all part of the same timeline right? Seto?) for that matter. If Yamato or bandai (depends on who has the licence, I think bandai is more likely though) wants to make toys out of them that's fine but there are a ton of toys I'd rather buy before this, including MacII valks (I dislike them very much but I still think they're better than the 2036 designs.) And if we're talking about Valks/mechs from PC engine game's I'd much rather see stuff from SDFM: Remember Me. the SDP-1 is one of my favorite valks, I would totally get one (it would be even better if they released it as an add on that you could attach to the existing v.2's) also Maybe I'm the only one who thinks this but the Maverick is an awesome Destroid, and it's the same from the waist down as the Tomahawk/Defender/Phalanx so Yamato's already half way there. When I ask these kinds of things people get mad, and tell me no and its robotech but when someone else does their like ya we are up to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anime52k8 Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 When I ask these kinds of things people get mad, and tell me no and its robotech but when someone else does their like ya we are up to it. because you suggested they make a toy based on a design by tommy Yune (current "creative director" for Robotech) that in turn is based on an animation error. Everything in this thread are original designs form various Macross games which are official parts of the Macross franchise (though not necessarily part of the main cannon time line). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anime52k8 Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 Ouch, that looks like a cross between vf-1s and rx-78 with typical gundam color. macrossdam more like a VF-1 wearing the VF-25's armor parts... hence why it's so cool Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nectarsis Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 sure. As long as they do a VF-4, VF-14, VF-17, VF-3000, VF-5000, VF-9, VA-3, Monster, v.2 Q-Rau, Glaug, Regult, Gnerl, Variable Glaug, SDP-1, Orguss Valkyrie, VERF-1, Feios Valkyrie, SW-XAII Schneegans, 1/2000 scale factory satellite... Seriously though, I've never been a fan of the R versions from the 2036 game or any of the alternate timeline designs (2036, eternal love song and MacII are all part of the same timeline right? Seto?) for that matter. If Yamato or bandai (depends on who has the licence, I think bandai is more likely though) wants to make toys out of them that's fine but there are a ton of toys I'd rather buy before this, including MacII valks (I dislike them very much but I still think they're better than the 2036 designs.) And if we're talking about Valks/mechs from PC engine game's I'd much rather see stuff from SDFM: Remember Me. the SDP-1 is one of my favorite valks, I would totally get one (it would be even better if they released it as an add on that you could attach to the existing v.2's) also Maybe I'm the only one who thinks this but the Maverick is an awesome Destroid, and it's the same from the waist down as the Tomahawk/Defender/Phalanx so Yamato's already half way there. Yet SDFM: Remember Me is from the NEC PC9801 is a computer not a PC Engine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anime52k8 Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 Yet SDFM: Remember Me is from the NEC PC9801 is a computer not a PC Engine the PC9801 and the PC Engine are both older than I am so I don't have first hand experience. I'm just repeating what I've read other places (Maqh.net and Mr. March's M3 both list it as a 1993 PC engine game ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.