Jump to content

Chronocidal

Members
  • Posts

    10072
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Chronocidal

  1. I think the blue was actually a side effect of some of the weird coloring seen on other Star Wars toys at the time.

    It was never really clear in the movies, but some of the color filtering did make the Ties look darker blue-gray, and many of the toys echoed that.  The one that sticks in my mind is the Action Fleet version, which was definitely closer to blue than gray.

    action-fleet-tie-interceptor-1.jpg

     

  2. On 4/14/2024 at 8:54 AM, Urashiman said:

    Only the ordinance missing. So I checked Macross Zero Episode 1, just to figure what I need. That‘ll be two AIM-9 and six AIM-7.

    IMG_7488.png.2a0ee7e96477bd1c4776ae8495af6038.png

    Then a blurry memory came up. I remembered what I wanted to do and why.

    The GWH kit only has two AIM-7…

    IMG_7490.jpeg.83b479acae18a851fa2e24bf8948fc40.jpeg

    urgh…

    I wanted to 3D print the missing four. Hahahhaha

    I‘ll finish what I have for the F-14 and add the missing ordinance later.

    Before you go printing Sparrows, take note of the fin shape.  They used AIM-120 AMRAAMs on the Mac-0 F-14s.

    They were never cleared for operational use, but the Navy did test using them.  Apparently they scrapped the idea when the upgrade wasn't deemed worth it, considering the limited use compared with the Super Hornet that was already in development.

    https://theaviationgeekclub.com/even-though-the-aim-120-was-successfully-tested-on-the-f-14-the-amraam-integration-into-fleet-tomcats-was-scrapped-heres-why/

  3. That's just.. they need to title it the "Never touch me" edition.  I wouldn't bet the chrome will last through a single transformation cycle.

    This is literally one you pose once, then lock it behind glass, or better yet, seal it in resin for eternity.

  4. Whether it gets released or not, it won't look anything like that prototype.

    I'm genuinely concerned about them attempting to make that into a transforming VF-11 derivative, because it shares almost nothing with the source design, and I have no idea how it will hold together in fighter mode with completely round arms and legs.

  5. 2 minutes ago, Spark-O-Matic said:

    I think KC looks better at least it has fast pack armor, but the Bandai one will likely not break if you move it around. not sure anyone really copied anything, its more of lazy imagination and not getting consumer feedback at least on one side.

    Copy or not, clear plastic has different structural properties than most others, and it tends to be much more brittle, or just fail in other unexpected ways.

    The clear plastic adapter that came with my TV super packs can attest to that, as the plastic formed a stress fracture after a few hours holding the valk.  I boxed back up the stand before it could fail and dump the valk off a shelf.

  6. 36 minutes ago, Sanity is Optional said:

    Is it just me, or does this look super weird with the combination of clear, metallic plastic, and metal coating parts?

    Definitely not just you.  

    However..  I am all for this sort of behavior by Bandai.  Yes, please Bandai, keep making these sorts of event exclusives for all your future events.

    Saves me a ton of trouble trying to get them if you keep making them this ugly. :rofl:

  7. I do remember seeing a teaser of something like this a few months back, probably a tiny teaser attached to something related to the VT-1 release.

    Otherwise.. yeah, no thanks, that's a nice chunk of money saved.  Helps me recover from the summer salvo hitting this year with the monthly releases stretching from May to probably September. :lol: 

  8. So that's definitely an interesting development.

    I think I have a grand total of one Fujimi kit in my collection, and it's an ancient 1/48 F-14A kit from 1978. :lol:  I'm not going to attempt to compare the accuracy of it, but it's probably the best fitting 1/48 F-14 kit I have, and I remember it being several huge steps above any other manufacturer in terms of ease of assembly, even to this day.  It just went together perfectly.

  9. Guess I'm glad I at least got a pair of good Tie fighters out of the deal to match with a Vader version if I ever get one, but the X-Wings are pretty bad by comparison.  My initial instincts about the mold were unfortunately on the nose.

    Pretty sad, the quality of the Y-Wings I grabbed got my hopes up, but these things are just weirdly sloppy and mis-molded messes.  I guess that's what you should expect as the first product in a line, but still disappointing.

  10. 5 hours ago, Convectuoso said:

    If they make a VF-19, I don't see any reasons for Bandai to not make a YF-19 in HMR

    What I'd really love to see is them exploring the larger variety of VF-19 variants in this cheaper line.  Maybe pull some of the racing designs in, or more paint options we saw in games, or the Master File.. maybe a Nothung?  Please? :p 

  11. 6 hours ago, Test_Pilot_2 said:

    Ne-ne-ne-ne-ne-crooooooooo Comboooooooo Brrrrrrrrreakerrrrrrrr!!!

    DX Monster owners out there - I can't be the only one missing/lacking a butt flap.

    Anyone find a solution over the years for replacements?

    Butt flaps, and random black hole sun pic we took during the eclipse today:

     

    20240408_113243.jpg

    OHEclipse_0408241519_7.jpg

    Might be tricky to color-match (either with paint or plain plastic), but I want to think it would be pretty easy to scratch-build those parts out of some scrap plastic.  The hinges might be tricky due to their size, but you might be able to substitute a piece of metal wire, if it's too hard of a shape to make.  I'd probably attempt to make something out of a sprue clipping, but I love punishing my fingers that way. :lol: 

  12. I picked up both of the old HM VF-19 releases years back, and they're distinctly "okay" in most respects.  They work well, and transform easily enough, but they're pretty long in the torso, and pretty gappy in fighter mode.

    I think the biggest issue many had with them was the complete lack of any landing gear (they eventually made a base with gear that you could rest the valk on), and I don't believe they were able to mount the gunpod at all (whether the later VF-19S fixed this, I don't recall at the moment).

  13. 24 minutes ago, Sanity is Optional said:

    Overall I agree, except for the fact that increasing production tends to *lower* costs, not raise them.

    I suspect it's partially that they just decided for MSRP ¥100=$1 (as it was close for quite a while), and partially they're using the extra profit to fund the US distribution specifically. Salaries, US events, advertising, etc.

    This is actually kind of the reverse.  The production line is complete, and all they have to do is make more.

    The problem is that making more takes production line time away from other products.  Going off of how they tend to produce everything in one go, adding more stock to a production run will absolutely throw a wrench in whatever schedule they have for that factory.

  14. I don't want to defend the price increases, but from a distribution and manufacturing standpoint, I can see why it had to happen.

    Consider that Bandai's production and distribution planning for Macross products has always been focused on the Japanese market alone, since international distribution wasn't "possible," at least not from an official point of view.

    So, how are you going to begin addressing the international demand officially?  What changes have to be made to manufacture enough for the perceived international demand?

    You don't want to hike prices for Japanese customers for the same products to support expanded production lines, and you don't want to even consider expanding them until you're sure sufficient international interest exists to support that expansion in the first place.

    So, I'm kind of in the mindset that the WWM releases are a market study.  I don't even know if Bandai is producing more stock.  What they are doing is studying whether there is enough demand outside of Japan to start paying more attention to their international customers.

    I'm thinking the international markup accomplishes two things, really.  On the one hand, it'll help cover the costs of increased production and distribution without passing that cost onto the Japanese market that didn't ask for it.  On the other, it gives them a measure of international interest, determining whether the extra cost hurdle is enough to offset the convenience of getting stuff from places like Amazon.

    The exchange rate and current economy being what they are, I'm curious whether they'll think it's worth the effort.  If prices keep everyone buying from Japanese stores anyway, Bandai really doesn't have any incentive to expand.

  15. 56 minutes ago, sh9000 said:

    I checked some numbers for 1 HMR VF-19 Fire Valkyrie:

    Nin-Nin-Game about $80

    Hobby Genki about $82

    Anime Export about $94

    HLJ about $85

    Amiami about $92

    CD Japan about $85

    Yoyakunow about $98

    Estimated shipping (DHL, Fedex, UPS, Registered Air) $25

    Estimated shipping through Surface would be cheaper.

     

    BBTS $140

    My state tax $13

    Shipping $4

     

    The cheapest price shipped for 1 HMR VF-19 Fire Valkyrie from those Japanese stores is about $105.  The highest price shipped is about $123.  BBTS shipped in my state is $157.

     

    Thanks for the comparison, I never ship anything as small as a single HMR, so I never see shipping that low. ^_^ 

  16. BBTS actually has a pretty good price on this one, considering you get it for $4 shipping, but you also wind up adding sales tax, so that could be better or worse depending on where you live.

    Overall though, for a single shipped item, you'd probably come out about even with most of the international vendors.

    I tend to stick with HLJ just because there are so many other things they sell that I use (mostly modeling supplies), so even on the rare occasion I'm only shipping one item, I can always throw other small things in the box to make it worth the shipping cost.

×
×
  • Create New...