Jump to content

Pat S

Members
  • Posts

    1020
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Pat S

  1. Wow this topic is political!

    I never knew that the foam was changed for environmental concerns. It's funny how the media doesn't dig this stuff up, and raise any questions. I say put some safe foam on the thing, and seal it up or whatever. Keep the missions going until there is a replacement, but the replacement program needs priority and a budget allocation.

  2. You know, for all people's moaning about how crappy the Shuttle is, and a lot of talk I hear about how we should scrap manned space missions altogether, I don't see any shortage of people lining up for the tiny chance of making it as an astronaut.  I wish I'd done better in school so I'd have a shot at it (of course thanks to Rutan maybe I do!!).  Let's not forget that even though the shuttles are due to be permanently grounded in 2010, they were intended to have a 100-mission lifespan.  When we do kill the program it'll be like having a classic car that's 25 years old and only has a couple thousand miles on it. 

    315927[/snapback]

    I don't say scrap NASA, just the Shuttle. We can come up with something better, it's been 30 years since it was designed. NASA would have no problem going with a new program if it had a decent budget, but taxpayers might flip out. You never see the price of war being touted on the media, but everytime NASA gets 5 minutes on TV, the budget is rolling along the bottom of the screen.

    Also, I believe the Shuttle was supposed to fly 100 missions or 10 years whichever comes first. :blink:

  3. Could build a new one, as we did after Challenger.

    Hell, the Endeavour's the best one we have, precisely BECAUSE it's newer.

    Could also refit Enterprise and make it spaceworthy, though I gather that'd be as expensive as building a new one.

    Not that I really think either is a good option.

    315845[/snapback]

    Making a new Shuttle will not fix the problem of ice laden foam from damaging the tiles on the shuttle.

    How about a carbon fiber shield for the underside and wings of the orbiter. Anything that falls off the tank will hit the carbon shield. Then when seperating from the tank, the carbon shield can be jetisoned. Just a thought.

  4. Good idea really. The ice has to come from somewhere, sealing the tank before filling it may at least help.

    From Widipedia entry on the Shuttles.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle

    For STS-1 and STS-2 the external tank was painted white to protect the insulation that covers much of the tank, but improvements and testing showed that it was not required. This saved considerable weight, and thereby increases the payload the Orbiter can carry into orbit.

    500 lbs according to this link...

    http://www.astronomycafe.net/qadir/ask/a11022.html

  5. The Beta's cockpit doesn't form the head, it folds down to become the front chest section, that covers the Fighter mode center gun. The head just pops up from it's bay behind the cockpit.

    311480[/snapback]

    Gotcha. Hopefully they incorporate that then. I was always confused by that transformation. The head and the cockpit both have yellow eye/lenses then. Weird. If it does have a cockpit, then it will really look weird in Soldier mode with the cockpit up and the head showing.

  6. There are a lot of young people who would never watch the original Dawn of the Dead because it's so old and outdated (the effects and music especially). At least a remake can get people interested in this type of genre again. I'd rather see a thousand Zombie remakes than a single Dukes of Hazzard one.

  7. Heheh :)

    He's carrying guns he can't fire. CLAW HANDS, NO TRIGGER FINGERS! :p

    Anyways, the Shadow has been my favorite so far. The Loz Viz stickers really set it off well. And it's a Low Viz scheme that has a basis in the show unlike the Yamato Low Viz. :lol:

    I like how the Scope on the gun can be raised or lowered, and is the same paint as the main sensor eye. The only thing I don't like is the gun is missing a part on one side. I think it's because they didn't have much room to work with, plus that peg hole for the gun is off to one side as well.

×
×
  • Create New...