Jump to content
Sanity is Optional

WIP: Alternate Weapons Pods for VF-31

Recommended Posts

Xigfrid inspired me to make use of my CAD software, and so I'm working up alternate pods for the VF-31, since I don't want my 31a using a damn drone charger.

First step, which is done, is to make a basic block-out of the outside of the pod in it's stowed shape.

f5AhYuG.jpg

 

Up next I'm going to try and make the simpler of the alternate pods shown in the master file (p76-77): the cluster missile pod (as they don't need to bend apart in the middle). Unsure quite how I want to do the hinged missile doors, might call for a brass rod running down the side as a hinge. If that goes well, I'll try the beam cannon unit. 

Probably not going to do the projection unit, as I'm not a fan of the look, and honestly curves are a giant PITA to model up in my CAD software.

 

Once I'm done I'll put the STPs and Parasolids up on a filesharing platform and upload the stuff to Shapeways as well.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is nice. Looking forward to it. Good luck! 

:good:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way, feel free to kibbitz on the design, I'm an engineer not a graphical designer here so I tend to make everything look like cubes as a default.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just looking forward to see what you're planning to do first. The Cluster Missile Pod like the 30's sounds interesting too. ;)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I'm going to try and match the illustrations the best I can while maintaining shape and function. In the case of the missile pod that means missile inserts and opening doors mainly, and a pretty simple exterior. Debating if I want to have the missiles be removable and complete as an option, or just do a 1-piece tray underneath with missile heads molded in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say one piece tray, bc my carpet loves to eat small parts. And really, how many of us take the missiles out, even on the VF-4?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Amazing, I will be watching closely this project! And yeah, don't bother making individual opening/ removable missiles. 

If you want display options, you can make it so the latchs open all together as one piece, but don't go with individual mechanisms. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great idea! Please, do the beam cannon as well. (Reminder to me: Put a 3D printer on my wish list for Xmas <_<

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Depending how long this takes to finish, and what I get for Christmas, I may have a Prusa I3 by the time I'm done modeling it up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Sanity is Optional said:

Depending how long this takes to finish, and what I get for Christmas, I may have a Prusa I3 by the time I'm done modeling it up.

mk2 or mk3?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, wmkjr said:

mk2 or mk3?

Mk3, if I'm going in, I'm going all the way.

Then some day add on the multi-spool attachment.

Edited by Sanity is Optional

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those are the ones I'm planning to do, other than the top-right, which is the "cluster missile missile", a missile that fires cluster missiles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The dual cannon back pack is cool but I suppose that model isn't wielding a regular gunpod is it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mommar said:

The dual cannon back pack is cool but I suppose that model isn't wielding a regular gunpod is it?

Actually, if you look you could theoretically swap the drone charger in for one side of the cannon pod (they share the same mid-section), but it'd be pointing the wrong way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any of the missile pack will have problem with attaching the 31 or at least it will look weird if it can't be split. I guess they did that adjustment seeing how it was off looking on the 30s when not handheld.

 

Anyway, excited for this project. Hope it is ready when the 31a arrives. Any of the packs is welcome

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks nice! Don’t forget to include a place for the gunpod. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, Sildani said:

Looks nice! Don’t forget to include a place for the gunpod. 

Unfortunately, by the lineart none of these alternate weapon pods have a place for the gunpod.

After I'm done with the cannons and missile pod I think I'll work up an alternate side-pod to replace the drone charger, but to put it on you'll have to open up the middle section, which appears to be screwed and glued shut.

At least the VF-31 still has the arm guns?

Edited by Sanity is Optional

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Arm guns, Head guns, those pod beam cannons... that should be MORE than enough. Failing that run the gunpods under the wings like the older VF's did

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1/72 as well?

 

... please?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, NZEOD said:

Arm guns, Head guns, those pod beam cannons... that should be MORE than enough. Failing that run the gunpods under the wings like the older VF's did

That's a great idea, ought to be easy enough to design a part that'll slot over the gun and let it sit on one of the wing mounts.

10 minutes ago, NZEOD said:

1/72 as well?

 

... please?

We'll see, since it's almost certainly going to be more complicated than just scaling everything. Hopefully it's just re-working the dimensions. I do have a 1/72 Bandai VF-31J I can work off of.

Edited by Sanity is Optional

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's today's WIP, added the midpoint protrusion, cutouts for the missiles, and the missile doors.

It's pretty close to the lineart, with the exception that the rear set of missiles is 8 cells long rather than 7. I tried 7, but it actually looked further from the art, it seems the drawn pod is a bit shorter, which means it won't work as well in fighter mode underneath (big gap). So I decided to add an extra set of missiles.

DEB1riC.jpg

Edited by Sanity is Optional
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I was thinking of redoing the pods, there was one imperative condition that came to my mind: the new pods should stay retracted in battroid mod.

If you say that the pod can be shorter to match the line art, but there is a gap bugging you in fighter mod, the solution would be to add a latch that would fill the gap in fighter mode, but can be retracted so the pod stays under the shoulders in Battroid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think it could stay retracted in battroid anyway, though I can check tomorrow how much shorter it would need to be. (To match lineart it's ~6mm shorter).

I did notice that I need to make the missile hatches more or less flush with the rest of the pod to make it stow properly in fighter mode, so I need to re-do the missile doors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That was quick. ;)

Any chance that it can be displayed like this in Battroid mode? 

FIGURE-005738_01.jpg

item_0000010693_w8Q88hg9_05.jpg

I know it just needed to be rotated, should the length and design should be 'symmetrical'? And by doing so, is it veering off too much from the lineart?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Going by the art it wouldn't work too well, it's decidedly asymmetric and the launch is going towards the top of the tube rather than the front.

I could try and work up another that mimics the VF-30 pod I suppose, though I'd rather do that after the beam cannon pod and alternate side-pod.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Checked the fit on the weapons pod, and altered the missile doors to where it ought to fit properly in fighter mode (both with and without super parts). If you want to deploy in battroid mode I'd suggest having it be fore-aft rather than left-right.

As to being stowable in battroid, going to say that one's flat out not possible without removing half the pod.

Hey Xigfrid, as someone with more experience in this, you have any suggestions on what wall thickness I ought to be using for the plastic? Right now I have it set at 2mm, but that's pretty beefy considering the size of the pod itself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's today's WIP:

JUQLr8q.jpg

Up next I think I'm going to make the missile trays a bit deeper, and the missiles taller and maybe larger, they look a bit tiny in there.

I'm still thinking over how to hinge the missile doors and where to separate the top and bottom parts of the main housing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Sanity is Optional said:

Checked the fit on the weapons pod, and altered the missile doors to where it ought to fit properly in fighter mode (both with and without super parts). If you want to deploy in battroid mode I'd suggest having it be fore-aft rather than left-right.

As to being stowable in battroid, going to say that one's flat out not possible without removing half the pod.

Hey Xigfrid, as someone with more experience in this, you have any suggestions on what wall thickness I ought to be using for the plastic? Right now I have it set at 2mm, but that's pretty beefy considering the size of the pod itself.

For a flat face, 2mm is the minimum thickness to obtain strength, under 2mm the plastic becomes flexible and at 1mm you have a high risk of breakage, I highly don't recommend to never ever use 0.7mm with  WSF. But you can consider the global design for the thickness, for instance if you make a "tube" design, then you can make a 1mm wall and the part will be strong: because the total thickness is 2mm.

For the Pod, you can make 1.2 -1.4mm and you will be ok, or if you want to use 1mm thickness, you will need internal reinforcements at regular intervals to keep the part from warping.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Xigfrid said:

For a flat face, 2mm is the minimum thickness to obtain strength, under 2mm the plastic becomes flexible and at 1mm you have a high risk of breakage, I highly don't recommend to never ever use 0.7mm with  WSF. But you can consider the global design for the thickness, for instance if you make a "tube" design, then you can make a 1mm wall and the part will be strong: because the total thickness is 2mm.

For the Pod, you can make 1.2 -1.4mm and you will be ok, or if you want to use 1mm thickness, you will need internal reinforcements at regular intervals to keep the part from warping.

Thanks for the input, I'll probably go through and strategically thin out a few places where the parts need to fit together.

Btw, does anyone have input on the door hinge location? There's 2 general options I'm considering for how the doors open, as shown below.

Gol1wba.jpg

aRJsE7i.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Had some free time at work, don't tell my boss, so I figured out the door hinges and made sure everything had clearance. This will require some 1/64" steel rod to pivot the doors on.

6cr9Ud4.gif

KIfrUOp.jpg

wlvUvcn.jpg

Edited by Sanity is Optional

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not shown in line art but i wonder, does it have missiles on the bottom as well?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×