VF-1 Enters GN-U Dou Line
#36
Posted 12 February 2009 - 10:56 AM
#37
Posted 12 February 2009 - 01:48 PM
#38
Posted 12 February 2009 - 06:08 PM
#39
Posted 13 February 2009 - 12:26 AM
(we're just daydreaming!)
#40
Posted 13 February 2009 - 03:49 AM







#41
Posted 13 February 2009 - 05:06 AM
Thank you very much!!!!
#42
Posted 13 February 2009 - 05:28 AM
This is probably the biggest gripe I have with these figures. I don't understand why they can't all be the same scale. I don't mind paying the difference if some are taller than others. I mean Kaiyodo did it with the VF-1's and the Regult, yet they kept the price pretty much the same, so it seems that cost isn't a factor. It's what irks me about those K&M figures, too. The Tomahawk is just as tall as the VF-1J and VF-1S figures, but the Regult is about the right scale when compared to the VF's.
#43
Posted 13 February 2009 - 05:40 AM
#44
Posted 13 February 2009 - 07:38 AM
Sorry Yamato - but you made your v.2 TOO GOOD.
I can do all of those poses with my version 2 1/60 VF-1 - and it's transformable.
Oh - and the trigger finger actually fits into the trigger.
Oh - and the back of the knees actually look anime accurate - whereas the GNU back of the knees...don't.
Not that I'm "mad" or anything. I understand they're competing with Revoltech/other small poseable anime action figures...
But... you can really tell it's a sort of marginal line.
Pete
#45
Posted 13 February 2009 - 07:48 AM
Yamato has already an excellent transformable line... Why bother to compete with Revoltech on this front? At least, why Macross?
Maybe it is really THAT cheap to manufacture, so Yamato wants to milk every drop of it in the 2009 Macross upsurge.
Sorry Yamato - but you made your v.2 TOO GOOD.
I can do all of those poses with my version 2 1/60 VF-1 - and it's transformable.
Oh - and the trigger finger actually fits into the trigger.
Oh - and the back of the knees actually look anime accurate - whereas the GNU back of the knees...don't.
Not that I'm "mad" or anything. I understand they're competing with Revoltech/other small poseable anime action figures...
But... you can really tell it's a sort of marginal line.
Pete
#46
Posted 13 February 2009 - 03:45 PM
#47
Posted 13 February 2009 - 03:52 PM
Sorry Yamato - but you made your v.2 TOO GOOD.
I can do all of those poses with my version 2 1/60 VF-1 - and it's transformable.
Oh - and the trigger finger actually fits into the trigger.
Oh - and the back of the knees actually look anime accurate - whereas the GNU back of the knees...don't.
Not that I'm "mad" or anything. I understand they're competing with Revoltech/other small poseable anime action figures...
But... you can really tell it's a sort of marginal line.
Pete
well, the gn-u has a waist joint and a deeper leg bend then the 1/60
#48
Posted 13 February 2009 - 04:06 PM
So:
GNU = $40.50 shipped (SAL)
1/60 = $125.00 shipped (SAL)
Which one am I going to pick? Not sure actually.
#49
Posted 13 February 2009 - 04:11 PM
So:
GNU = $40.50 shipped (SAL)
1/60 = $125.00 shipped (SAL)
Which one am I going to pick? Not sure actually.
I would never get one over a 1/60 but I might get one as a dupe or on an impulse buy if I saw it a hobby store or something.
#50
Posted 13 February 2009 - 04:19 PM
So:
GNU = $40.50 shipped (SAL)
1/60 = $125.00 shipped (SAL)
Which one am I going to pick? Not sure actually.
definitely go for the 1/60 if you can only get one or the other... transformable definitely beats more poseable...
#51
Posted 13 February 2009 - 05:19 PM
So one question is if the $74 price difference between the GNU and the 1/60 plus the extra $10 for shipping (SAL) so a total of $84.50 is worth it?
So:
GNU = $40.50 shipped (SAL)
1/60 = $125.00 shipped (SAL)
Which one am I going to pick? Not sure actually.
I'd choose the GNU if they were actually in 1/100 scale. Alas...
While not a priority, I might get one anyways.
Not necessarily. That depends on how one wishes to "play" with one's toy.
#52
Posted 13 February 2009 - 05:32 PM
in my book, a transformable toy for a transforming mech always beats a non-transformable rendition even if it could do yoga poses...
...but, yeah, these GN-U's do look good, but i would only get them after i have acquired the 1/60 version and it goes on sale and i have the extra $$$ for it...
Edited by m0n5t3r, 13 February 2009 - 05:38 PM.
#53
Posted 13 February 2009 - 05:50 PM
unless these sell for $15-$20
its not gonna work for me
Doesn't feel like I'm getting my
money worth.
yes they look nice but how many valks
do I need now that Yamato has finally gotten
it right with the new 1/60 v 2.0
edit:
I was just thinking, why dont they go make an SDF-1
bendable knees elbows rotating head etc
I'd rather have that than another vf-1
Edited by Macross73, 13 February 2009 - 06:28 PM.
#54
Posted 13 February 2009 - 09:49 PM
#55
Posted 13 February 2009 - 10:28 PM
#56
Posted 14 February 2009 - 12:23 AM
GNU = $40.50 shipped (SAL)
1/60 = $125.00 shipped (SAL)
Which one am I going to pick? Not sure actually.
For me it would be the 1/60 no doubt about it. But not really due to price differences or any such consideration. And also not due simply to it "transforming." It's not just that it transforms - it's that it looks perfect in all three modes, comes with super and strike parts etc etc etc - that gimmick with the removable nose...everything...
I like poseable mecha figures like Revoltech. I prefer their wacky anime design to what Yamato have given us in GNU. I prefer the Revoltech Macross to the GNU Macross Plus for instance. Why? Because the Revoltech molds take full advantage of being non-transformable and therefore go all out in giving us pure anime inspired poses/sculpts. The Yamatos just don't look that appealing to me when compared to Revoltech Valkyrie...
Pete
#57
Posted 14 February 2009 - 05:31 AM
It would be nice if it had an actual waist joint instead of the mid torso joint that it does have. the one part I really don't like is the way the heat shield kind of sticks out since it's attached to the Chest.
#58
Posted 14 February 2009 - 04:54 PM
#59
Guest_sh002_*
Posted 15 February 2009 - 12:14 PM
#60
Posted 15 February 2009 - 04:59 PM
#61
Posted 15 February 2009 - 08:50 PM
#62
Posted 15 February 2009 - 09:12 PM
If the VF1s are as big as the previous GNU series, then they are approximately 1/100 in scale, as my VF11/YF19 & 21 are as tall as Toynami VF1 and Bandai 1/100 VF1S model kit. I must confess I wasn't a great fan of the GNUs and (yes) they are too frakking expensive for what you get and are not as poseable as the Revoltechs (other favourites of mine). Despite this, I cannot but love them. They are always on display on my desk.
#63
Posted 16 February 2009 - 08:05 AM
#64
Posted 16 February 2009 - 08:56 AM
And the verdict is still out on the VF100's. (although I can't fight the fact I'll probably snatch up an VF-27 regardless..)
#65
Posted 16 February 2009 - 09:46 AM
#67
Posted 27 February 2009 - 04:37 PM
#68
Posted 06 March 2009 - 07:41 AM
Yamato 1/60 v.2s are a must and are to be kept under glass
Revoltech for cheap fun with lots of accessories at your desk
GN-U ? Unless you come out with something no one else has I will not be considering the line.
#69
Posted 06 March 2009 - 07:59 AM
lineart accurate battroid proportions
It's amazing that within the past 27 years we've never seen a VF-1 toy with lineart accurate battroid proportions. As magnificent as the engineering is behind the v2 1/60 VF-1, it's battroid mode still suffers from anorexic legs and the unsightly priest-collar. Even the non-transformable battroid toys of the past have managed to somehow get the proportions wrong. It's refreshing to finally see a VF-1 battroid toy with accurate proportions, even if it's not transformable.
#70
Posted 06 March 2009 - 08:10 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













