source
Megahouse Ranka in swimsuit 1:8 figure
#1
Posted 22 January 2009 - 07:36 AM
#2
Posted 22 January 2009 - 08:18 AM
#3
Posted 22 January 2009 - 08:21 AM
Besides - I like her best in that white dress with the blue lining and the neato big boots - like the gashaprom wave 1 figure has.
Pete
#4
Posted 22 January 2009 - 08:31 AM
#5
Posted 22 January 2009 - 08:55 AM
No poo! I could't recognize that it was Ranka when I first saw it. Blame it on the SMS grunt that paint it:
http://that.animeblo...across-f104.jpg
#6
Posted 22 January 2009 - 08:59 AM
http://that.animeblo...across-f104.jpg
Doesn't matter when even Ozma wants a piece of the action.
#7
Posted 22 January 2009 - 09:03 AM
#8
Posted 22 January 2009 - 09:15 AM
#9
Posted 22 January 2009 - 09:19 AM
It's on Canalia's monster. So technically yes, and technically no.
#10
Posted 22 January 2009 - 09:42 AM
#11
Posted 22 January 2009 - 09:50 AM
man I wonder what Ranka said about that when she saw it from Alto's cockpit... >_>
Also, this one is totally for the lolicons. Pass.
#12
Posted 22 January 2009 - 09:52 AM
WHAT? NO WAY... Why the hell does the figure have underwear.. this is not ANIME ACCURATE.
#13
Posted 22 January 2009 - 09:57 AM
Ah - thanks. Might have to get this then.
WHAT? NO WAY... Why the hell does the figure have underwear.. this is not ANIME ACCURATE.
Actually - at least now we also know that the hair color is anime accurate. It isn't a heavy real green on the Monster - but a kind of yellowish/green tint.
As for the panties. I think she has panties on in that painting - you just can't see them... although - yeah - there's no panty line on her hips there...
non-anime accurate
Pete
#14
Posted 22 January 2009 - 09:58 AM
OMG! Look at the legs! They don't sit high enough in that crouched position!
THIS IS A DISASTER! The crotch is positioned TOO LOW and the ANKLES are horrendous!
I HATE IT! I HATE IT! That's why I'm only buying one of them.
#15
Posted 22 January 2009 - 09:58 AM
#16
Posted 22 January 2009 - 10:00 AM
Saw a close up of it and she didn't have it. I remember myself drooling over it.
anyways, I was just kidding around it not being anime accurate
#17
Posted 22 January 2009 - 10:00 AM
Man if you don't know the ansewr to that one.......
Seriously though about how many cm/inches tall will it be? @$85 CAD it's not bad.
Edited by logos, 22 January 2009 - 10:06 AM.
#18
Posted 22 January 2009 - 10:02 AM
OMG! Look at the legs! They don't sit high enough in that crouched position!
THIS IS A DISASTER! The crotch is positioned TOO LOW and the ANKLES are horrendous!
I HATE IT! I HATE IT! That's why I'm only buying one of them.
You know - the sucky thing is... when I first saw it - I thought: no - thighs to hefty, calves too fat and too big a gutt to be Ranka - and then suddenly, it turns out it's off the Monster - and yeah - the body type fits.
This makes me wonder - is that Ranka an artist's impression, or did she really model for it?
Because honestly, her body is way to beefed up in that pick - at least that's the impression I get when compared to her "in clothing" looks.
Still - might pick one of these up.
Pete
#19
Posted 22 January 2009 - 11:41 AM
This makes me wonder - is that Ranka an artist's impression, or did she really model for it?
Because honestly, her body is way to beefed up in that pick - at least that's the impression I get when compared to her "in clothing" looks.
Still - might pick one of these up.
Pete
This is the womanly Ranka... you know, with the child-bearing hips and all-- too bad the boobs didn't develop as well... and I DEMAND ANIME ACCURACY!
#20
Posted 22 January 2009 - 12:01 PM
That is all.
#21
Posted 22 January 2009 - 12:03 PM
man I wonder what Ranka said about that when she saw it from Alto's cockpit... >_>
Man have I wondered how they got that past Ozma..
One could argue so was Ranka in general.
It's an interesting piece..if only because it uses rather obscure piece of art for reference. I don't think it interests me beyond the curiosity of it all.
[..not that I haven't thought of a custom paint of a Konig Monster with that on the side, however.]
Edited by Letigre, 22 January 2009 - 12:04 PM.
#22
Posted 22 January 2009 - 01:48 PM
#23
Posted 22 January 2009 - 02:11 PM
#24
Posted 22 January 2009 - 03:12 PM
#25
Posted 22 January 2009 - 03:57 PM
I'm not surprised, just pissed off.
If I had power, they would be anime-accurate... You know what I mean.
#26
Posted 22 January 2009 - 07:56 PM
If I had power, they would be anime-accurate... You know what I mean.
But but... SK didn't provide detailed and accurate lineart for that area! It can't be canon!
XD
#27
Posted 22 January 2009 - 08:02 PM
Waiter! Check please...
#28
Posted 22 January 2009 - 08:18 PM
XD
SK didn't, but, then again, SK's not the character designer.
Waiter! Check please...
I think he jizzed in his pants
#29
Posted 22 January 2009 - 08:26 PM
Yeh, I know. I was making references to intense debates over VF toy/model accuracies =P
#30
Posted 22 January 2009 - 08:34 PM
#31
Posted 22 January 2009 - 08:36 PM
If I actually collected these type of figures, I'd buy ranka, no questions asked. Sadly though I don't really collect them.
#32
Posted 22 January 2009 - 08:48 PM
If I actually collected these type of figures, I'd buy ranka, no questions asked. Sadly though I don't really collect them.
I think we're all still waiting for a 1:1 inflatable Misa
It's not SK's fault Bandai Fails. It's the Gundamaniacs' faults! (Steven Spielberg presents: The Gundamaniacs!)
It's not SK's fault Yamato falls apart. It's... Well, I got no pun for that, actually...
#33
Posted 22 January 2009 - 10:15 PM
I think we're all still waiting for a 1:1 inflatable Misa
wtf?
#34
Posted 22 January 2009 - 11:42 PM
WHY NOT SHERYL swimsuit!!!!
Hope this isn't going to be a Nadesico thing where that loli chick (whatshername) has more figs of her than of the more buxsom sheilas (like 10 other chicks)
Edited by ruskiiVFaussie, 22 January 2009 - 11:43 PM.
#35
Posted 22 January 2009 - 11:49 PM
WHY NOT SHERYL swimsuit!!!!
Hope this isn't going to be a Nadesico thing where that loli chick (whatshername) has more figs of her than of the more buxsom sheilas (like 10 other chicks)
I guess they just wanted to do something that wasn't so obvious. The Monster-pose is a good candidate. It threw me at first until someone pointed out where it came from.
I like it.
I'm a Ranka fan.
I'll get it.
And now here comes the real question: Is she taking her bra off? ....or...is she having trouble putting it on?
Knowing our little munchkin - I'd wager that Ranka had trouble clipping/fastening the bra and was stumbling her way through the process - and maybe the artist decided to capture her that way, rather than wait for it to be fastened.
It's a very good character piece, in this sense, because it shows how so much of her cuteness flows from her clumsiness
Pete
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











